Novel options in Prenatal Genetic Diagnostic

Vladislav Sergeevich Baranov , Tatyana Vladimirovna Kuznetzova

Journal of obstetrics and women's diseases ›› 2015, Vol. 64 ›› Issue (2) : 4 -12.

PDF
Journal of obstetrics and women's diseases ›› 2015, Vol. 64 ›› Issue (2) : 4 -12. DOI: 10.17816/JOWD6424-12
Articles
research-article

Novel options in Prenatal Genetic Diagnostic

Author information +
History +
PDF

Abstract

Modern molecular approaches to prenatal diagnostic of inherited diseases are briefly reviewed. Advantages and limitations of molecular methods for analysis of chromosomal anomalies (QF-PCR, aCGH, NGS) are considered in line with conventional prenatal karyotyping. The special attention is paid to efficacy, limitations and diagnostic options of noninvasive prenatal genetic testing (NIPT). Some particular problems of its widespread implication into routine clinical practice are discussed. State of art in preimplantation genetic diagnostics (PGD) and obvious great opportunities of preconceptional genetic testing are highlighted.

Keywords

inherited disorders / non-invasive prenatal diagnosis / prenatal karyotyping / QF-PCR / array-based comparative genomic hybridization / genetic card of reproductive health, genetic testing

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Vladislav Sergeevich Baranov, Tatyana Vladimirovna Kuznetzova. Novel options in Prenatal Genetic Diagnostic. Journal of obstetrics and women's diseases, 2015, 64(2): 4-12 DOI:10.17816/JOWD6424-12

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

Баранов В. С., Айламазян Э. К., ред. Современные алгоритмы и новые возможности пренатальной диагностики наследственных и врожденных заболеваний: Методические рекомендации. СПб.: Изд-во Н-Л, 2013.

[2]

Демин Г. С., Иващенко Т. Э., Федорова И. Д., Белоцерковский И. К., Чиряева О. Г., Петрова Л. И., Садик Н. А., Дудкина B. C., Кузнецова Т. В., Баранов B. C. Особенности пренатальной диагностики хромосомных болезней с помощью метода количественной флуоресцентной ПЦР. Медицинская генетика. 2008; 7 (5): 20-25.

[3]

Жученко Л. А., Голошубов П. А., Андреева Е. Н., Калашникова Е. А., Юдина Е. В., Ижевская В. Л. Анализ результатов раннего пренатального скрининга, выполняющегося по национальному приоритетному проекту «Здоровье» в субъектах Российской Федерации. Результаты российского мультицентрового исследования «Аудит-2014». Медицинская генетика. 2014; 13 (144): 3-54.

[4]

Лебедев И. Н., Кашеварова А. А., Скрябин Н. А., Никитина Т. В., Лопаткина М. Е., Мельников А. А., Саженова Е. А. Матричная сравнительная геномная гибридизация (array-CGH) в диагностике хромосомного дисбаланса и CNV-полиморфизма при анэмбрионии. Ж. акуш. и жен. болезн. 2013; 62 (2): 117-25.

[5]

Тарасенко О. А., Насыхова Ю. А., Иващенко Т. Э., Коротеев А. Л., Николаева Ю. А., Талантова О. Е., Чиряева О. Г., Петрова Л. И., Садик Н. А., Дудкина В. С., Баранов В. С. Пренатальная диагностика наиболее распространенных хромосомных аномалий методом QF-PCR в Санкт-Петербурге. Медицинская генетика. 2012; 11 (118): 42-49.

[6]

Benn P, Chapman AR, Erickson K, Defrancesco MS, Wilkins-Haug L, Egan JF, Schulkin J. Obstetricians and gynecologists' practice and opinions of expanded carrier testing and noninvasive prenatal testing. Prenat Diagn. 2014; 34 (2): 145-52.

[7]

Benn P. Mendelian disorders: universal carrier testing. Prenatal screening perspectives. 2011; 16: 4.

[8]

Bug S, Solfrank B, Schmitz F, Pricelius J, Stecher M, Craig A, Botcherby M, Nevinny-Stickel-Hinzpeter C. Bug S, Solfrank B, Schmitz F, et al. Diagnostic utility of novel combined arrays for genome-wide simultaneous detection of aneuploidy and uniparental isodisomy in losses of pregnancy. Molecular Cytogenetics. 2014; 7:43. Available at: http://www.molecularcytogenetics.org/content/7/1/43.

[9]

Callaway J. L., Shaffer L. G., Chitty L. S., Rosenfeld J. A., Crolla J. A. The clinical utility of microarray technologies applied to prenatal cytogenetics in the presence of a normal conventional karyotype: a review of the literature. Prenat. Diagn. 2013; 33 (12):1119-23.

[10]

Committee Opinion No. 581: the use of chromosomal microarray analysis in prenatal diagnosis. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists Committee on Genetics. Obstet Gynecol. 2013; 122 (6): 1374-7.

[11]

DGV-Database of Genomic Variants). URL: http://projects.tcag.ca.

[12]

E. C. A. Cytogenetic Guidelines and Quality Assurance. E. C. A. Newsletter. 2012; N 29: 7-25.

[13]

Ensembl (DECIPHER-Database of Chromosomal Imbalance and Phenotype in Humans Using Ensembl Resources) URL: https://decipher.sanger.ac.uk.

[14]

Hui L, Teoh M, da Silva Costa F, Ramsay P, Palma-Dias R, Richmond Z, Piessens S, Walker S; Australian NIPT collaboration. Clinical implementation of cell-free DNA-based aneuploidy screening: perspectives from a national audit. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2015; 45 (1): 10-15.

[15]

ISCN (2013): An international system for human cytogenetic nomenclature, L. G. Shaffer, J. McGowan-Jordan, M. Schmid (eds); S. Karger, Basel 2013.

[16]

Kingsmore S. Preconceptional testing by next generation sequencing Reprod Biomedicine Online. 2012; 24 (suppl. 2): S27-S29.

[17]

Kitzman JO, Snyder MW, Ventura M, Lewis AP, Qiu R, Simmons LE, Gammill HS, Rubens CE, Santillan DA, Murray JC, Tabor HK, Bamshad MJ, Eichler EE, Shendure J. Noninvasive whole-genome sequencing of a human fetus. Sci Transl Med. 2012; 4 (137): 137.

[18]

Lanphier E, Urnov F, Haecker SE, Werner M, Smolenski JDon't edit the human germ line. Nature. 2015; 519 (7544): 410-1.

[19]

Nicolaides K. H., Syngelaki A., Gil M., Atanasova V., Markova D. Validation of targeted sequencing of single-nucleotide polymorphisms for non-invasive prenatal detection of aneuploidy of chromosomes 13, 18, 21, X, and Y. Prenat Diagn 2013; 33 (6): 575-9.

[20]

Novelli A, Cavalli P, Bernardini L. The future of prenatal diagnosis: karyotype, microarray or both? Technical and ethical considerations. Expert Rev Proteomics. 2013; 10 (2):131-4.

[21]

Shaffer I.G, Van der Veiver. New technologies for assessment of chromosomes in prenatal diagnosis. Prenat Diagn. 2012; 32 (4): 307-309.

[22]

Srinivasan BS, Evans EA, Flannick J, Patterson AS, Chang CC, Pham T, Young S, Kaushal A, Lee J, Jacobson JL, Patrizio P. A universal carrier test for the long tail of Mendelian disease.Reprod Biomed Online. 2010 Oct;21 (4):537-51.

[23]

Stumm M, Entezami M, Haug K, Blank C, Wüstemann M, Schulze B, Raabe-Meyer G, Hempel M, Schelling M, Ostermayer E, Langer-Freitag S, Burkhardt T, Zimmermann R, Schleicher T, Weil B, Schöck U, Smerdka P, Grömminger S, Kumar Y, Hofmann W. Diagnostic accuracy of random massively parallel sequencing for non-invasive prenatal detection of common autosomal aneuploidies: a collaborative study in Europe. Prenat Diagn. 2014; 34 (2): 185-91.

[24]

Torjesen I. UK moves a step closer to being first country in world to allow “three parent babies”. BMJ. 2013; 346: 1899.

[25]

Wapner R. J., Martin C. L., Levy B., Ballif B. C., Eng C. M., Zachary J. M., Savage M., Platt L. D., Saltzman D., Grobman W. A., Klugman S., Scholl T., Simpson J. L., McCall K., Aggarwal V. S., Bunke B., Nahum O., Patel A., Lamb A. N., Thom E. A., Beaudet A. L., Ledbetter D. H., Shaffer L. G., Jackson L. Chromosomal microarray versus karyotyping for prenatal diagnosis. N Engl J Med. 2012; 367 (23): 2175-84.

[26]

Wells D, Kaur K, Grifo J, Glassner M, Taylor JC, Fragouli E, Munne S. Clinical utilisation of a rapid low-pass whole genome sequencing technique for the diagnosis of aneuploidy in human embryos prior to implantation. J Med Genet. 2014; 51 (8): 553-62.

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

Baranov V.S., Kuznetzova T.V.

AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF

46

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

AI思维导图

/