Issues in reproductive health in chromosome translocation carriers

Abstract

BACKGROUND: It is common a wide range of reproductive disorders in couples with structural chromosome aberration in one of the partners, such as infertility, miscarriage, unsuccessful assisted reproductive technologies attempts. In this regard, predicting the reproductive outcome in a particular couple is an extremely difficult task. To solve it, it is necessary to consider the influence of many factors, including the type of chromosome translocation and the carrier’s sex.

AIM: To evaluate the structure of reproductive disorders in couples where one of the partners was a chromosome translocation carrier, depending on its type: Robertsonian or reciprocal, and carrier’s sex.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this retrospective cohort study, we analyzed the clinical and anamnestic data of 100 couples where one of the partners was a chromosome translocation carrier. Couples applied to fertility centers between March 2009 and May 2019. To assess the effect of the type of chromosomal translocation and carrier’s sex, we provided intergroup comparisons.

RESULTS: Comparative analysis of somatic pathology and chronic gynecological diseases didn’t reveal significant differences between groups of female patients (Fischer’s exact test, p > 0,05). An intergroup comparison of reproductive outcomes in couples divided by the type of chromosome translocation: reciprocal or Robertsonian, and the carrier’s sex, detected significant differences. Primary infertility was significantly more often detected in couples with a male translocation carrier, secondary — with a female carrier (Fisher’s exact test, p = 0,01). Pregnancy significantly more frequent occurred and, it was also significantly more often spontaneously interrupted in couples with a female carrying of reciprocal or Robertson translocation (χ² = 13,29, df = 3, p = 0,004). Thus, a female carrying a chromosomal translocation is characterized by a greater risk of miscarriage.

CONCLUSIONS: The chromosome translocation type and the carrier’s sex have a differential effect on the nature of reproductive disorders. Female carrying a chromosomal translocation increases the likelihood of both pregnancy and its spontaneous termination. In contrast, in couples with a male translocation carrier, the probability of both pregnancy and miscarriage is lower. Thus, the type of translocation and the carrier’s sex determine the individual risks of reproductive disorders, including infertility and miscarriage, which should be considered in the planning, choosing the method of onset and management of pregnancy.

Keywords

reproductive disorders / carriers of structural chromosomal rearrangements / miscarriage / infertility

References

[1] Boivin J, Bunting L, Collins JA, et al. International estimates of infertility prevalence and treatment-seeking: potential need and demand for infertility medical care Hum Reprod. 2007;22(6):1506–1512. DOI: 10.1093/humrep/dem046

[2] Boivin J., Bunting L., Collins J.A., et al. International estimates of infertility prevalence and treatment-seeking: potential need and demand for infertility medical care // Hum. reprod. 2007. Vol. 22. No. 6, P. 1506–1512. DOI: 10.1093/humrep/dem046

[3] Polis CB, Cox CM, Tunçalp Ö, et al. Estimating infertility prevalence in low-to-middle-income countries: an application of a current duration approach to demographic and health survey data. Hum Reprod. 2017;32(5):1064–1074. DOI: 10.1093/humrep/dex025

[4] Polis C.B., Cox C.M., Tunçalp Ö., et al. Estimating infertility prevalence in low-to-middle-income countries: an application of a current duration approach to demographic and health survey data // Hum. Reprod. 2017. Vol. 32. No. 5. P. 1064–1074. DOI: 10.1093/humrep/dex025

[5] Shah K, Sivapalan G, Gibbons N, et al. The genetic basis of infertility. Reproduction. 2003;126(1):13–25. DOI: 10.1530/rep.0.1260013

[6] Shah K., Sivapalan G., Gibbons N., et al. The genetic basis of infertility // Reproduction. 2003. Vol. 126. No. 1. P. 13–25. DOI: 10.1530/rep.0.1260013

[7] Krausz C, Riera-Escamilla A. Genetics of male infertility. Nat Rev Urol. 2018;15(6):369–384. DOI: 10.1038/s41585-018-0003-3

[8] Krausz C., Riera-Escamilla A. Genetics of male infertility // Nature reviews. Urology. 2018. Vol. 15. No. 6. P. 369-384. DOI: 10.1038/s41585-018-0003-3

[9] Zorrilla M, Yatsenko AN. The genetics of infertility: current status of the field. Curr Genet Med Rep. 2013;1(4). DOI: 10.1007/s40142-013-0027-1

[10] Zorrilla M., Yatsenko A.N. The genetics of infertility: current status of the field // Current genetic medicine reports. 2013. Vol. 1. No. 4. DOI: 10.1007/s40142-013-0027-1

[11] Wilch ES, Morton CC. Historical and clinical perspectives on chromosomal translocations. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2018;1044:1–14. DOI: 10.1007/978-981-13-0593-1_1

[12] Wilch E.S., Morton C.C. Historical and clinical perspectives on chromosomal translocations // Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 2018. Vol. 1044. P. 1–14. DOI: 10.1007/978-981-13-0593-1_1

[13] Bochkov NP, Kuleshov NP, Chebotarev AN, et al. Population cytogenetic investigation of newborns in Moscow. Humangenetik. 1974;22(2):139–152. DOI: 10.1007/BF00278453

[14] Bochkov N.P., Kuleshov N.P., Chebotarev A.N., et al. Population cytogenetic investigation of newborns in Moscow // Humangenetik. 1974. Vol. 22. No 2. P. 139–152. DOI: 10.1007/BF00278453

[15] Hamerton JL, Canning N, Ray M, et al. A cytogenetic survey of 14,069 newborn infants. I. Incidence of chromosome abnormalities. Clin Genet. 1975;8(4):223–243. DOI: 10.1111/j.1399-0004.1975.tb01498.x

[16] Hamerton J.L., Canning N., Ray M., et al. A cytogenetic survey of 14,069 newborn infants. I. Incidence of chromosome abnormalities // Clin. genetics. 1975. Vol. 8. No 4. P. 223–243. DOI: 10.1111/j.1399-0004.1975.tb01498.x

[17] Hansteen IL, Varslot K, Steen-Johnsen J, et al. Cytogenetic screening of a new-born population. Clin Genet. 1982;21(5):309–314. DOI: 10.1111/j.1399-0004.1982.tb01377.x

[18] Hansteen I.L., Varslot K., Steen-Johnsen J., et al. Cytogenetic screening of a new-born population // Clin. Genetics. 1982. Vol. 21. No 5. P. 309–314. DOI: 10.1111/j.1399-0004.1982.tb01377.x

[19] Jacobs PA, Melville M, Ratcliffe S, et al. A cytogenetic survey of 11,680 newborn infants. Ann Hum Genet. 1974;37(4):359–376. DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-1809.1974.tb01843.x

[20] Jacobs P.A., Melville M., Ratcliffe S., et al. A cytogenetic survey of 11680 newborn infants // Annals of human genetics. 1974. Vol. 37. P. 359–376. DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-1809.1974.tb01843.x

[21] Nielsen J, Sillesen I. Incidence of chromosome aberrations among 11148 newborn children. Humangenetik. 1975;30(1):1–12. DOI: 10.1007/BF00273626

[22] Nielsen J., Sillesen I. Incidence of chromosome aberrations among 11148 newborn children // Humangenetik. 1975. Vol. 30. No 1. P. 1–12. DOI: 10.1007/BF00273626

[23] Nielsen J, Wohlert M. Chromosome abnormalities found among 34,910 newborn children: results from a 13-year incidence study in Arhus, Denmark. Hum Genet. 1991;87(1):81–83. DOI: 10.1007/BF01213097

[24] Nielsen J., Wohlert M. Chromosome abnormalities found among 34,910 newborn children: results from a 13-year incidence study in Arhus, Denmark // Hum. Genetics. 1991. Vol. 87. No 1. P. 81–83. DOI: 10.1007/BF01213097

[25] Artini PG, Papini F, Ruggiero M, et al. Genetic screening in Italian infertile couples undergoing intrauterine insemination and in vitro fertilization techniques: a multicentric study. Gynecol Endocrinol. 2011;27(7):453–457. DOI: 10.3109/09513590.2011.579207

[26] Artini P.G., Papini F., Ruggiero M., et al. Genetic screening in Italian infertile couples undergoing intrauterine insemination and in vitro fertilization techniques: a multicentric study // Gynecol. Endocrinol. 2011. Vol. 27. No 7. P. 453–457. DOI: 10.3109/09513590.2011.579207

[27] Testart J, Gautier E, Brami C, et al. Intracytoplasmic sperm injection in infertile patients with structural chromosome abnormalities. Hum Reprod. 1996;11(12):2609–2612. DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a01917

[28] Testart J., Gautier E., Brami C., et. al. Intracytoplasmic sperm injection in infertile patients with structural chromosome abnormalities // Human Reproduction. 1996. Vol. 11. No 12, P. 2609–2612. DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a019179

[29] Meza-Espinoza JP, Anguiano LO, Rivera H. Chromosomal abnormalities in couples with reproductive disorders. Gynecol Obstet Invest. 2008;66(4):237–240. DOI: 10.1159/000147170

[30] Meza-Espinoza J.P., Anguiano L.O., Rivera H. Chromosomal abnormalities in couples with reproductive disorders // Gynecol. Obstet. Investigation. 2008. Vol. 66. No 4. P. 237–240. DOI: 10.1159/000147170

[31] Peschka B, Leygraaf J, Van der Ven K, et al. Type and frequency of chromosome aberrations in 781 couples undergoing intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Hum Reprod. 1999;14(9):2257–2263. DOI: 10.1093/humrep/14.9.2257

[32] Peschka B., Leygraaf J., Van der Ven K., et. al. Type and frequency of chromosome aberrations in 781 couples undergoing intracytoplasmic sperm injection // Hum. Reprod. 1999. Vol. 14. No 9. P. 2257–2263. DOI: 10.1093/humrep/14.9.2257

[33] Jesus AR, Silva-Soares S, Silva J, et al. Reproductive success of assisted reproductive technology in couples with chromosomal abnormalities. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2019;36(7):1471–1479. DOI: 10.1007/s10815-019-01486-x

[34] Jesus A.R., Silva-Soares S., Silva J., et al. Reproductive success of assisted reproductive technology in couples with chromosomal abnormalities // J. Assist. Reprod. Genet. 2019. Vol. 36. No 7. DOI: 10.1007/s10815-019-01486-x

[35] Castle D, Bernstein R. Cytogenetic analysis of 688 couples experiencing multiple spontaneous abortions. Am J Med Genet. 1988;29(3):549–556. DOI: 10.1002/ajmg.1320290312

[36] Castle D., Bernstein R. Cytogenetic analysis of 688 couples experiencing multiple spontaneous abortions // Am. J. Med. Genet. 1988. Vol. 29. No 3. P. 549–556. DOI: 10.1002/ajmg.1320290312

[37] Awartani KA, Al Shabibi MS. Description of cytogenetic abnormalities and the pregnancy outcomes of couples with recurrent pregnancy loss in a tertiary-care center in Saudi Arabia. Saudi Med J. 2018;39(3):239–242. DOI: 10.15537/smj.2018.3.21592

[38] Awartani K.A., Al Shabibi M.S. Description of cytogenetic abnormalities and the pregnancy outcomes of couples with recurrent pregnancy loss in a tertiary-care center in Saudi Arabia // Saudi Med. J. 2018. Vol. 39. No 3. P. 239–242. DOI: 10.15537/smj.2018.3.21592

[39] Elkarhat Z, Kindil Z, Zarouf L, et al. Chromosomal abnormalities in couples with recurrent spontaneous miscarriage: a 21-year retrospective study, a report of a novel insertion, and a literature review. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2019;36(3):499–507. DOI: 10.1007/s10815-018-1373-4

[40] Elkarhat Z., Kindil Z., Zarouf L., et al. Chromosomal abnormalities in couples with recurrent spontaneous miscarriage: a 21-year retrospective study, a report of a novel insertion, and a literature review // J. Assist. Reprod. Genet. 2019. Vol. 36. No 3. P. 499–507. DOI: 10.1007/s10815-018-1373-4

[41] Ghazaey S, Keify F, Mirzaei F, et al. Chromosomal analysis of couples with repeated spontaneous abortions in northeastern Iran. Int J Fertil Steril. 2015;9(1):47–54. DOI: 10.22074/ijfs.2015.4208

[42] Ghazaey S., Keify F., Mirzaei F., et al. Chromosomal analysis of couples with repeated spontaneous abortions in northeastern iran // Int. J. Fertil. Steril. 2015. Vol. 9. No 1. P. 47–54. DOI: 10.22074/ijfs.2015.4208

[43] Zemlyanova EV, Chumarina VZh. Births’ postponement by women in Russia within modern socio-economic context. Social’nye aspekty zdorov’a naselenia. 2018;64(6). (In Russ.). DOI: 10.21045/2071-5021-2018-64-6-9

[44] Землянова Е.В., Чумарина В.Ж. Откладывание деторождения российскими женщинами в современных социально-экономических условиях // Социальные аспекты здоровья населения. 2018. № 64(6). DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.21045/2071-5021-2018-64-6-9

[45] Glick I, Kadish E, Rottenstreich M. Management of pregnancy in women of advanced maternal age: improving outcomes for mother and baby. Int J Womens Health. 2021;13:751–759. DOI: 10.2147/IJWH.S283216

[46] Glick I., Kadish E., Rottenstreich M. Management of pregnancy in women of advanced maternal age: improving outcomes for mother and baby // Int. J. Womens Health. 2021. Vol. 13. P. 751-759. DOI: 10.2147/IJWH.S283216

[47] Waldenström U. Postponing parenthood to advanced age. Ups J Med Sci. 2016;121(4):235–243. DOI: 10.1080/03009734.2016.1201553

[48] Waldenström U. Postponing parenthood to advanced age // Ups. J. Med. Sci. 2016. Vol. 121. No 4. P. 235–243. DOI: 10.1080/03009734.2016.1201553

[49] Guedes M, Canavarro MC. Characteristics of primiparous women of advanced age and their partners: a homogenous or heterogenous group?. Birth. 2014;41(1):46–55. DOI: 10.1111/birt.12089

[50] Guedes M., Canavarro M.C. Characteristics of primiparous women of advanced age and their partners: a homogenous or heterogenous group? // Birth. 2014. Vol. 41. No 1. P. 46–55. DOI: 10.1111/birt.12089

[51] Mayeur A, Ahdad N, Hesters L, et al. Does the prognosis after PGT for structural rearrangement differ between female and male translocation carriers?. Reprod Biomed Online. 2020;40(5):684–692. DOI: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2020.01.025

[52] Mayeur A., Ahdad N., Hesters L., et al. Does the prognosis after PGT for structural rearrangement differ between female and male translocation carriers? // Reprod. Biomed. Online. 2020. Vol. 40. No 5. P. 684–692. DOI: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2020.01.025

[53] Song H, Shi H, Yang ET, et al. Effects of gender of reciprocal chromosomal translocation on blastocyst formation and pregnancy outcome in preimplantation genetic testing. Front Endocrinol. 2021;12. DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2021.704299

[54] Song H., Shi H., Yang E.T., et al. Effects of gender of reciprocal chromosomal translocation on blastocyst formation and pregnancy outcome in preimplantation genetic testing // Front. Endocrinol. 2021. Vol. 12. DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2021.704299

[55] Fodina V, Dudorova A, Alksere B, et al. The application of PGT-A for carriers of balanced structural chromosomal rearrangements. Gynecol Endocrinol. 2019;35(sup.1):18–23. DOI: 10.1080/09513590.2019.1632091

[56] Fodina V., Dudorova A., Alksere B., et al. The application of PGT-A for carriers of balanced structural chromosomal rearrangements // Gynecol. Endocrinol. 2019. Vol. 35. Sup. 1. P. 18–23. DOI: 10.1080/09513590.2019.1632091

[57] Mateu-Brull E, Rodrigo L, Peinado V, et al. Interchromosomal effect in carriers of translocations and inversions assessed by preimplantation genetic testing for structural rearrangements (PGT-SR). J Assist Reprod Genet. 2019;36(12):2547–2555. DOI: 10.1007/s10815-019-01593-9

[58] Mateu-Brull E., Rodrigo L., Peinado V., et al. Interchromosomal effect in carriers of translocations and inversions assessed by preimplantation genetic testing for structural rearrangements (PGT-SR) // J. Assist. Reprod. Genet. 2019. Vol. 36. No 12. P. 2547–2555. DOI: 10.1007/s10815-019-01593-9

[59] Zhang L, Wei D, Zhu Y, et al. Interaction of acrocentric chromosome involved in translocation and sex of the carrier influences the proportion of alternate segregation in autosomal reciprocal translocations. Hum Reprod. 2019;34(2):380–387. DOI: 10.1093/humrep/dey367

[60] Zhang L., Wei D., Zhu Y., et al. Interaction of acrocentric chromosome involved in translocation and sex of the carrier influences the proportion of alternate segregation in autosomal reciprocal translocations // Hum. Reprod. 2019. Vol. 34. No 2. P. 380–387. DOI: 10.1093/humrep/dey367

[61] Mahdavi M, Sharafi SM, Daniali SS, et al. The clinical effectiveness of preimplantation genetic diagnosis for chromosomal translocation carriers: a meta-analysis. Glob Med Genet. 2020;7(1):14–21. DOI: 10.1055/s-0040-1712455

[62] Mahdavi M., Sharafi S.M., Daniali S.S., et al. The clinical effectiveness of preimplantation genetic diagnosis for chromosomal translocation carriers: a meta-analysis // Glob. Med. Genet. 2020. Vol. 7. No 1. P. 14–21. DOI: 10.1055/s-0040-1712455

[63] Zhang L, Jiang W, Zhu Y, et al. Effects of a carrier’s sex and age on the segregation patterns of the trivalent of Robertsonian translocations. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2019;36(9):1963–1969. DOI: 10.1007/s10815-019-01534-6

[64] Zhang L., Jiang W., Zhu Y., et al. Effects of a carrier’s sex and age on the segregation patterns of the trivalent of Robertsonian translocations // J. Assist. Reprod. Genet. 2019. Vol. 36. No 9. P. 1963–1969. DOI: 10.1007/s10815-019-01534-6

[65] Maithripala S, Durland U, Havelock J, et al. prevalence and treatment choices for couples with recurrent pregnancy loss due to structural chromosomal anomalies. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2018;40(6):655–662. DOI: 10.1016/j.jogc.2017.09.024

[66] Maithripala S., Durland U., Havelock J., et al. Prevalence and treatment choices for couples with recurrent pregnancy loss due to structural chromosomal anomalies // J. Obstet. Gynaecol. Can. 2018. Vol. 40. No 6. P. 655–662. DOI: 10.1016/j.jogc.2017.09.024

[67] Kato K, Aoyama N, Kawasaki N, et al. Reproductive outcomes following preimplantation genetic diagnosis using fluorescence in situ hybridization for 52 translocation carrier couples with a history of recurrent pregnancy loss. J Hum Genet. 2016;61(8):687–692. DOI: 10.1038/jhg.2016.39

[68] Kato K., Aoyama N., Kawasaki N., et al. Reproductive outcomes following preimplantation genetic diagnosis using fluorescence in situ hybridization for 52 translocation carrier couples with a history of recurrent pregnancy loss // J. Hum. Genet. 2016. Vol. 61. No 8. P. 687–692. DOI: 10.1038/jhg.2016.39

[69] Huang C, Jiang W, Zhu Y, et al. Pregnancy outcomes of reciprocal translocation carriers with two or more unfavorable pregnancy histories: before and after preimplantation genetic testing. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2019;36(11):2325–2331. DOI: 10.1007/s10815-019-01585-9

[70] Huang C., Jiang W., Zhu Y., et al. Pregnancy outcomes of reciprocal translocation carriers with two or more unfavorable pregnancy histories: before and after preimplantation genetic testing // J. Assist. Reprod. Genet. 2019. Vol. 36. No 11. P. 2325–2331. DOI: 10.1007/s10815-019-01585-9

[71] Iews M, Tan J, Taskin O, et al. Does preimplantation genetic diagnosis improve reproductive outcome in couples with recurrent pregnancy loss owing to structural chromosomal rearrangement? A systematic review. Reprod Biomed Online. 2018;36(6):677–685. DOI: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2018.03.005

[72] Iews M., Tan J., Taskin O., et al. Does preimplantation genetic diagnosis improve reproductive outcome in couples with recurrent pregnancy loss owing to structural chromosomal rearrangement? A systematic review // Reprod. Biomed. Online. 2018. Vol. 36. No 6. P. 677–685. DOI: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2018.03.005

[73] Chen CK, Wu D, Yu HT, et al. Preimplantation genetic diagnosis by fluorescence in situ hybridization of reciprocal and Robertsonian translocations. Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol. 2014;53(1):48–52. DOI: 10.1016/j.tjog.2012.04.043

[74] Chen C.K., Wu D., Yu H.T., et al. Preimplantation genetic diagnosis by fluorescence in situ hybridization of reciprocal and Robertsonian translocations // Taiwan J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2014. Vol. 53. No 1. P. 48–52. DOI: 10.1016/j.tjog.2012.04.043

[75] Gardner RJM, Sutherland G., Shaffer L. Chromosome abnormalities and genetic counseling. 4th ed. New York: Oxford University Press; 2012. DOI: 10.1093/med/9780195375336.001.0001

[76] Gardner R.J.M., Sutherland G., Shaffer L. Chromosome abnormalities and genetic counseling. 4th ed. New York: Oxford University Press, 2012. DOI: 10.1093/med/9780195375336.001.0001

[77] Fiorentino F, Spizzichino L, Bono S, et al. PGD for reciprocal and Robertsonian translocations using array comparative genomic hybridization. Hum Reprod. 2011;26(7):1925–1935. DOI: 10.1093/humrep/der082

[78] Fiorentino F., Spizzichino L., Bono S., et al. PGD for reciprocal and Robertsonian translocations using array comparative genomic hybridization // Hum. Reprod. 2011. Vol. 26. P. 1925–1935. DOI: 10.1093/ humrep/der082

[79] Hann MC, Lau PE, Tempest HG. Meiotic recombination and male infertility: from basic science to clinical reality? Asian J Androl. 2011;13(2):212–218. DOI: 10.1038/aja.2011.1

[80] Hann M.C., Lau P.E., Tempest H.G. Meiotic recombination and male infertility: from basic science to clinical reality? // Asian J. Androl. 2011. Vol. 13. No 2. P. 212–218. DOI: 10.1038/aja.2011.1

[81] Harton GL, Tempest HG. Chromosomal disorders and male infertility. Asian J Androl. 2012;14(1):32–39. DOI: 10.1038/aja.2011.66

[82] Harton G.L., Tempest H.G. Chromosomal disorders and male infertility // Asian J. Androl. 2012. Vol. 14. No 1. P. 32–39. DOI: 10.1038/aja.2011.66

[83] Morin SJ, Eccles J, Iturriaga A, et al. Translocations, inversions and other chromosome rearrangements. Fertil Steril. 2017;107(1):19–26. DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2016.10.013

[84] Morin S.J., Eccles J., Iturriaga A., et al. Translocations, inversions and other chromosome rearrangements // Fertil. Steril. 2017. Vol. 107. No 1. P. 19–26. DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2016.10.013

[85] Marchetti F, Wyrobek AJ. Mechanisms and consequences of paternally-transmitted chromosomal abnormalities. Birth Defects Res C Embryo Today. 2005;75(2):112–129. DOI: 10.1002/bdrc.20040

[86] Marchetti F., Wyrobek A.J. Mechanisms and consequences of paternally-transmitted chromosomal abnormalities // Birth Defects Res. C Embryo. Today. 2005. Vol. 75. No 2. P. 112–129. DOI: 10.1002/bdrc.20040

[87] Yin B, Zhu Y, Wu T, et al. Clinical outcomes for couples containing a reciprocal chromosome translocation carrier without preimplantation genetic diagnosis. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2017;136(3):304–308. DOI: 10.1002/ijgo.12062

[88] Yin B., Zhu Y., Wu T., et al. Clinical outcomes for couples containing a reciprocal chromosome translocation carrier without preimplantation genetic diagnosis // Int. J. Gynaecol. Obstet. 2017. Vol. 136. No 3. P. 304–308. DOI: 10.1002/ijgo.12062

[89] Li S, Chen M, Zheng PS. Analysis of parental abnormal chromosomal karyotype and subsequent live births in Chinese couples with recurrent pregnancy loss. Sci Rep. 2021;11(1). DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-98606-4

[90] Li S., Chen M., Zheng P.S. Analysis of parental abnormal chromosomal karyotype and subsequent live births in Chinese couples with recurrent pregnancy loss // Sci. Rep. 2021. Vol. 11. No 1. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-98606-4

[91] Franssen MT, Korevaar JC, van der Veen F, et al. Reproductive outcome after chromosome analysis in couples with two or more miscarriages: index [corrected]-control study. BMJ. 2006;332(7544):759–763. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.38735.459144.2F

[92] Franssen M.T., Korevaar J.C., van der Veen F., et al. Reproductive outcome after chromosome analysis in couples with two or more miscarriages: index [corrected]-control study // BMJ. 2006. Vol. 332(7544). P. 759–763. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.38735.459144.2F

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

Eсо-Vector