Obstetric audit of cesarean sections according to M. Robson classification criteria – the experience of St. Petersburg in 2020-2021
Vitaly F. Bezhenar , Nesterov Nesterov , Ivan A. Pryalukhin
Journal of obstetrics and women's diseases ›› 2022, Vol. 71 ›› Issue (2) : 7 -16.
Obstetric audit of cesarean sections according to M. Robson classification criteria – the experience of St. Petersburg in 2020-2021
An external audit of the childbirth outcomes was conducted in accordance with M. Robson’s 10-group classification. The main determinants of indications and the frequency of cesarean section in obstetric medical organizations of St. Petersburg in 2020-2021 were analyzed in order to find effective mechanisms for reducing the frequency of сesarean delivery within the framework of compliance with modern principles of perinatal-oriented obstetrics and the preservation of a woman’s reproductive health. Possible effective reserves for reducing the frequency of CS are presented: personalized pre-gravidar preparation in high-perinatal risk women groups, personalized approach to methods of pre-induction and induction of labor in high-risk groups’ patients, rational management of labor in compliance with modern clinical recommendations, wider use of current classical external manual methods for antenatal correction of fetus pelvic presentation, prevention the primary cesarean deliveries, increase in the rate of vaginal deliveries among women with previous cesarean deliveries, optimization of effective antenatal psychological consultation about the delivery methods among pregnant women with breech presentation, previous cesarean deliveries and multiple pregnancy.
caesarean delivery / abdominal delivery / uterine scar / M. Robson classification / maternal and perinatal outcomes
| [1] |
Decree of Prezident of Russian Federation No. 1351 of 2007 Oct. 9 “Ob utverzhdenii Kontseptsii demograficheskoy politiki Rossiyskoy Federatsii na period do 2025 goda” (s izmeneniyami i dopolneniyami). Suppl. Kontseptsiya demograficheskoy politiki RF na period do 2025 g. (In Russ.). [cited 2021 Jan 28]. Available from: https://base.garant.ru/191961/ |
| [2] |
Указ Президента РФ от 9 октября 2007 г. № 1351 «Об утверждении Концепции демографической политики Российской Федерации на период до 2025 года» (с изменениями и дополнениями). Приложение. Концепция демографической политики РФ на период до 2025 г. [дата обращения 12.01.2022]. Доступ по ссылке: http://www.kremlin.ru/acts/bank/26299 |
| [3] |
Bacci A, Lewis G, Baltag V, Betrán AP. The introduction of confidential enquiries into maternal deaths and near-miss case reviews in the WHO European Region. Reprod Health Matters. 2007;15(30):145–152. DOI: 10.1016/S0968-8080(07)30334-0 |
| [4] |
Bacci A., Lewis G., Baltag V., Betrán A.P. The introduction of confidential enquiries into maternal deaths and near-miss case reviews in the WHO European Region // Reprod. Health Matters. 2007. Vol. 15. No. 30. P. 145–152. DOI: 10.1016/S0968-8080(07)30334-0 |
| [5] |
The global strategy for women’s, children’s and Adolescents’ health (2016–2030). [cited 2021 Jan 28]. Available from: https://globalstrategy.everywomaneverychild.org/pdf/EWEC_globalstrategyreport_200915_FINAL_WEB.pdf |
| [6] |
Every woman, every child. [Internet]. The global strategy for women’s, children’s and Adolescents’ health (2016–2030). [дата обращения 12.01.2022]. Доступ по ссылке: https://globalstrategy.everywomaneverychild.org/pdf/EWEC_globalstrategyreport_200915_FINAL_WEB.pdf |
| [7] |
Bezhenar VF, Adamyan LV, Filippov OS, et al. Maternal mortality in the North-Western federal region of the Russian Federation: a comparative analysis of 2018–2019, conceptual approaches to reduction. Problems of reproduction. 2020;26(6):32–40. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.17116/repro20202606233 |
| [8] |
Беженарь В.Ф., Адамян Л.В., Филиппов О.С. и др. Материнская смертность в Северо-Западном федеральном округе Российской Федерации: сравнительный анализ 2018–2019 гг., концептуальные подходы к снижению // Проблемы репродукции. 2020. Т. 26. № 6 (2). С. 32–40. DOI: 10.17116/repro20202606233 |
| [9] |
Metodicheskoe pis’mo MZ RF ot 19.02.2019 No. 15-4/4/2-1286 “O vnedrenii klassifikatsii operatsii Kesareva secheniya M. Robsona”. (In Russ.). [cited 2021 Jan 28]. Available from: https://medvestnik.ru/content/documents/15-4-I-2-1286-ot-19-02-2019-g.html |
| [10] |
Методическое письмо МЗ РФ от 19.02.2019 № 15-4/4/2-1286 «О внедрении классификации операции Кесарева сечения М. Робсона». [дата обращения 12.01.2022]. Доступ по ссылке: https://medvestnik.ru/content/documents/15-4-I-2-1286-ot-19-02-2019-g.html |
| [11] |
World Health Organization. [Internet]. WHO statement on caesarean section rates. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2015. [cited 2021 Jan 28]. Available from: https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/161442/WHO_RHR_15.02_eng.pdf?sequence=1 |
| [12] |
World Health Organization. [Internet]. WHO statement on caesarean section rates. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2015. [дата обращения 12.01.2022]. Доступ по ссылке: https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/161442/WHO_RHR_15.02_eng.pdf?sequence=1 |
| [13] |
FIGO Working Group On Challenges In Care Of Mothers And Infants During Labour And Delivery. Best practice advice on the 10-Group Classification System for cesarean deliveries. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2016;135(2):232–233. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2016.08.001 |
| [14] |
FIGO Working Group On Challenges In Care Of Mothers And Infants During Labour And Delivery. Best practice advice on the 10-Group Classification System for cesarean deliveries // Int. J. Gynaecol. Obstet. 2016. Vol. 135. No. 2. P. 232–233. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2016.08.001 |
| [15] |
Robson M. Classification of caesarean sections. Fetal Matern Med Rev. 2001;(12):23–39. DOI: 10.1017/S0965539501000122 |
| [16] |
Robson M. Classification of caesarean sections // Fetal. Matern. Med. Rev. 2001. Vol. 12. No. 1. P. 23–39. DOI: 10.1017/S0965539501000122 |
| [17] |
Robson classification: Implementation manual. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2017. [cited 2021 Jan 28]. Available from: http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/259512/9789241513197-eng.pdf?sequence=1 |
| [18] |
World Health Organization. [Internet]. Robson Classification: Implementation manual. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2017. [дата обращения 12.01.2022]. Доступ по ссылке: http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/259512/9789241513197-eng.pdf?sequence=1 |
| [19] |
Rekomendatsii po vnedreniyu, ispol’zovaniyu i analizu otcheta po klassifikatsii operatsii kesarevo sechenie Robsona: metodicheskoe pis’mo. Moscow; 2019. (In Russ). [cited 2021 Jan 28]. Available from: https://tamponada.ru/assets/files/%D0%A0%D0%B5%D0%BA%D0%BE%D0%BC%D0%B5%D0%BD%D0%B4%D0%B0%D1%86%D0%B8%D0%B8%20%D0%9A%D0%A1%20%D0%A0%D0%BE%D0%B1%D1%81%D0%BE%D0%BD.pdf |
| [20] |
Рекомендации по внедрению, использованию и анализу отчета по классификации операции кесарево сечение Робсона: методическое письмо. Москва, 2019. [дата обращения 12.01.2022]. Доступ по ссылке: https://tamponada.ru/assets/files/%D0%A0%D0%B5%D0%BA%D0%BE%D0%BC%D0%B5%D0%BD%D0%B4%D0%B0%D1%86%D0%B8%D0%B8%20%D0%9A%D0%A1%20%D0%A0%D0%BE%D0%B1%D1%81%D0%BE%D0%BD.pdf |
| [21] |
Vogel JP, Betrán AP, Vindevoghel N, et al. Use of the Robson classification to assess caesarean section trends in 21 countries: a secondary analysis of two WHO multicountry surveys. Lancet Glob Health. 2015;3(5):e260–e270. DOI: 10.1016/S2214-109X(15)70094-X |
| [22] |
Vogel J.P., Betrán A.P., Vindevoghel N. et al. Use of the Robson classification to assess caesarean section trends in 21 countries: a secondary analysis of two WHO multicountry surveys // Lancet Glob. Health. 2015. Vol. 3. No. 5. P. e260–e270. DOI: 10.1016/S2214-109X(15)70094-X |
| [23] |
Tanaka K, Mahomed K. The ten-group Robson classification: A single centre approach identifying strategies to optimise caesarean section rates. Obstet Gynecol Int. 2017;2017:5648938. DOI: 10.1155/2017/5648938 |
| [24] |
Tanaka K., Mahomed K. The ten-group Robson classification: A single centre approach identifying strategies to optimise caesarean section rates // Obstet. Gynecol. Int. 2017. Vol. 2017. P. 5648938. DOI: 10.1155/2017/5648938 |
| [25] |
Poryadok okazaniya meditsinskoy pomoshchi po profilyu “akusherstvo i ginekologiya” (Prikaz MZ RF ot 20.10.20 g. No. 1130n). (In Russ.). [cited 2021 Jan 28]. Available from: https://docs.cntd.ru/document/566162019 |
| [26] |
Порядок оказания медицинской помощи по профилю «акушерство и гинекология» (Приказ МЗ РФ от 20.10.2020 № 1130н) [дата обращения 12.01.2022]. Доступ по ссылке: https://docs.cntd.ru/document/566162019 |
| [27] |
Rody odnoplodnye, rodorazreshenie putem kesareva secheniya. Klinicheskie rekomendatsii Minzdrava RF. 2021. (In Russ.). [cited 2021 Jan 28]. Available from: https://cr.minzdrav.gov.ru/recomend/639_1 |
| [28] |
Роды одноплодные, родоразрешение путем кесарева сечения. Клинические рекомендации Минздрава РФ, 2021. [дата обращения 12.01.2022]. Доступ по ссылке: https://cr.minzdrav.gov.ru/recomend/639_1 |
| [29] |
Neudachnaya popytka stimulyatsii rodov (podgotovka sheyki matki k rodam i rodovozbuzhdenie). Klinicheskie rekomendatsii Minzdrava RF. 2021. (In Russ.). [cited 2021 Jan 28]. Available from: https://cr.minzdrav.gov.ru/recomend/640_1 |
| [30] |
Неудачная попытка стимуляции родов (подготовка шейки матки к родам и родовозбуждение). Клинические рекомендации Минздрава РФ, 2021. [дата обращения 12.01.2022]. Доступ по ссылке: https://cr.minzdrav.gov.ru/recomend/640_1 |
| [31] |
Rody odnoplodnye, samoproizvol’noe rodorazreshenie v zatylochnom predlezhanii (normal’nye rody). Klinicheskie rekomendatsii Minzdrava RF. 2021. (In Russ.). [cited 2021 Jan 28]. Available from: https://cr.minzdrav.gov.ru/recomend/636_1 |
| [32] |
Роды одноплодные, самопроизвольное родоразрешение в затылочном предлежании (нормальные роды). Клинические рекомендации Минздрава РФ, 2021. [дата обращения 12.01.2022]. Доступ по ссылке: https://cr.minzdrav.gov.ru/recomend/636_1 |
| [33] |
Prezhdevremennye rody. Klinicheskie rekomendatsii Minzdrava RF. 2020. (In Russ.). [cited 2021 Jan 28]. Available from: https://cr.minzdrav.gov.ru/recomend/331_1 |
| [34] |
Преждевременные роды. Клинические рекомендации Минздрава РФ, 2020. [дата обращения 12.01.2022]. Доступ по ссылке: https://cr.minzdrav.gov.ru/recomend/331_1 |
| [35] |
Preeklampsiya. Eklampsiya. Oteki, proteinuriya i gipertenzivnye rasstroystva vo vremya beremennosti, v rodakh i poslerodovom periode. Klinicheskie rekomendatsii Minzdrava RF. 2021. (In Russ.). [cited 2021 Jan 28]. Available from: https://cr.minzdrav.gov.ru/recomend/637_1 |
| [36] |
Преэклампсия. Эклампсия. Отеки, протеинурия и гипертензивные расстройства во время беременности, в родах и послеродовом периоде. Клинические рекомендации Минздрава РФ, 2021. [дата обращения 12.01.2022]. Доступ по ссылке: https://cr.minzdrav.gov.ru/recomend/637_1 |
| [37] |
Tazovoe predlezhanie ploda. Klinicheskie rekomendatsii Minzdrava RF. 2020. [cited 2021 Jan 28]. Available from: https://cr.minzdrav.gov.ru/recomend/626_1 |
| [38] |
Тазовое предлежание плода. Клинические рекомендации Минздрава РФ, 2020. [дата обращения 12.01.2022]. Доступ по ссылке: https://cr.minzdrav.gov.ru/recomend/626_1 |
| [39] |
Mnogoplodnaya beremennost’. Klinicheskie rekomendatsii Minzdrava RF. 2021. (In Russ.). [cited 2021 Jan 28]. Available from: https://cr.minzdrav.gov.ru/recomend/638_1 |
| [40] |
Многоплодная беременность. Клинические рекомендации Минздрава РФ, 2021. [дата обращения 12.01.2022]. Доступ по ссылке: https://cr.minzdrav.gov.ru/recomend/638_1 |
| [41] |
Kesarevo sechenie. Problemy abdominal’nogo akusherstva: ruk. dlya vrachei. Editor V.I. Krasnopol’skiy. 3th ed. Moscow; 2018. (In Russ.) |
| [42] |
Кесарево сечение. Проблемы абдоминального акушерства: рук. для врачей / под ред. В.И. Краснопольского. 3-е изд. М., 2018. |
| [43] |
Torloni MR, Betran AP, Souza JP, et al. Classifications for cesarean section: a systematic review. PLoS One. 2011;6(1):e14566. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0014566 |
| [44] |
Torloni M.R., Betran A.P., Souza J.P. et al. Classifications for cesarean section: a systematic review // PLoS One. 2011. Vol. 6. No. 1. P. e14566. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0014566 |
| [45] |
Betrán AP, Vindevoghel N, Souza JP, et al. A systematic review of the Robson classification for caesarean section: what works, doesn’t work and how to improve it. PLoS One. 2014;9(6):e97769. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0097769 |
| [46] |
Betrán A.P., Vindevoghel N., Souza J.P. et al. A systematic review of the Robson classification for caesarean section: what works, doesn’t work and how to improve it // PLoS One. 2014. Vol. 9. No. 6. P. e97769. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0097769 |
| [47] |
Souter VL, Katon JG, Chien A, et al. The Robson classification monitoring and comparing cesarean delivery rates. Obstet Gynecol. 2016;127(Suppl):131S. DOI: 10.1097/01.A0G.0000483531.18218.6d |
| [48] |
Souter V.L., Katon J.G., Chien A. et al. The Robson classification monitoring and comparing cesarean delivery rates // Obstet. Gynecol. 2016. No. 127. Suppl. P. 131S. DOI: 10.1097/01.A0G.0000483531.18218.6d |
| [49] |
Rijken MJ, Asah-Opoku K. Interpretation of caesarean section classifications. BJOG. 2019;126(6):701. DOI: 10.1111/1471-0528.15627 |
| [50] |
Rijken M.J., Asah-Opoku K. Interpretation of caesarean section classifications // BJOG. 2019. Vol. 126. No. 6. P. 701. DOI: 10.1111/1471-0528.15627 |
Eсо-Vector
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |