Comparative evaluation of different minimally invasive methods of genital prolapse correction
A. A. Popov , S. L. Gorsky , T. N. Manannikova , G. G. Shahinyan , V. D. Petrova , M. A. Chechneva
Journal of obstetrics and women's diseases ›› 2000, Vol. 49 ›› Issue (5S) : 20 -21.
Comparative evaluation of different minimally invasive methods of genital prolapse correction
By minimally invasive methods of surgical treatment we mean benefits performed under endoscopic, transvaginal or percutaneous access without extensive opening of the skin, aponeurosis, and abdominal cavity. The development of minimally invasive surgery is currently the most promising trend in all fields of medicine, gynecology in particular. The advantages of minimally invasive technologies manifest themselves most fully at surgeries in hard-to-reach for traditional surgery areas, such as the cervical space of the small pelvis and the urethrovesical segment area. This fact together with high frequency of genital prolapse and dissatisfaction with the results of earlier proposed methods of treatment determined our interest in this problem.
genital prolapse / correction / comparative evaluation / minimally invasive techniques
Eсо-Vector
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |
PDF
