Influence of metaprot and hypoxen on the inflammatory reaction development in the experiment

Vasiliy Yegorovich Novikov , Sergey Alekseyevich Ilyukhin , Yelena Vasilyevna Pozhilova

Reviews on Clinical Pharmacology and Drug Therapy ›› 2012, Vol. 10 ›› Issue (4) : 63 -66.

PDF
Reviews on Clinical Pharmacology and Drug Therapy ›› 2012, Vol. 10 ›› Issue (4) : 63 -66. DOI: 10.17816/RCF10463-66
Articles
other

Influence of metaprot and hypoxen on the inflammatory reaction development in the experiment

Author information +
History +
PDF

Abstract

The dynamics of the acute inflammatory response was observed in the experiment modeling caragenin-induced rat paw inflammation. The changes in the volume of damaged limb (paw edema) and indices of free radical oxidation were registered. Acetylsalicylic acid in the dose of 100 mg/kg was shown to reduce the development of inflammation. Hypoxen and metaprot in the dose of 50 mg/kg have got low anti-inflammatory activity, but potentiated the effect of acetylsalicylic acid. Simultaneous enteral administration of hypoxen and metaprot with the acetylsalicylic acid during the treatment with caragenin the powerful anti-inflammatory effect was marked, it was presented with a significant decrease in the parameters of inflammation recorded and rapid recovery of the damaged limb. The combination of hypoxen with acetylsalicylic acid was the most effective one.

Keywords

hypoxen / metaprot / acetylsalicylic acid / caragenin / acute inflammation

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Vasiliy Yegorovich Novikov, Sergey Alekseyevich Ilyukhin, Yelena Vasilyevna Pozhilova. Influence of metaprot and hypoxen on the inflammatory reaction development in the experiment. Reviews on Clinical Pharmacology and Drug Therapy, 2012, 10(4): 63-66 DOI:10.17816/RCF10463-66

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

Барчук М. А., Прилепова И. А. Динамика показателей перекисного окисления липидов и ферментативного звена антирадикальной защиты при лечении пациентов с язвенной болезнью // Совр. гастроэнтерология. — 2002. — № 2. — С. 59–61.

[2]

Игнатов Ю. Д., Кукес В. Г., Мазуров В. И. Клиническая фармакология нестероидных противовоспалительных средств. — М.: ГЭОТАР, 2010. — 258 с.

[3]

Левченкова О. С., Новиков В. Е. Антигипоксанты: возможные механизмы действия и клиническое применение // Вестник СГМА. — 2011. — № 4. — С. 43–57.

[4]

Новиков В. Е., Левченкова О. С. Фармакология гипоксии. — Смоленск: СГМА, 2007. — 130 с.

[5]

Новиков В. Е., Крюкова Н. О., Новиков А. С. Гастропротекторные свойства мексидола и гипоксена // Эксперим. и клин. фармакология. — 2010. — № 5. — С. 15–18.

[6]

Руководство по экспериментальному (доклиническому) изучению новых фармакологических веществ / Под ред. Р. У. Хабриева. — М., 2005. — 832 с.

[7]

Смирнов В. С., Кузьмич М. К. Гипоксен. — СПб., М.: Фарминдекс, 2001. — 104 с.

[8]

Brooks P. M. Treatment of rheumatoid arthritis: from symptomatic relife to potential cure // Br. J. Rheumatol. — 1998. — Vol. 37. — P. 1265–1271.

[9]

Crapo J. D. Oxidative stress as an inhibitor of cytokine release and cell damage // First ERS Lung Science Conference. — Taormina, 2003. — P. 15–19.

[10]

Rahman I., Adcock I. M. Oxidative stress and redox regulation of lung inflammation in COPD // Eur. Respir. J. — 2006. — Vol. 28. — P. 219–242.

[11]

Vane J. R., Flower R. J., Botting R. M. History of aspirin and its mechanism of action // Stroke. — 1990. — Vol. 21, Suppl. 12. — P. 12–23.

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

Novikov V.Y., Ilyukhin S.A., Pozhilova Y.V.

AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF

173

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

AI思维导图

/