Efficiency of laparoscopic technique of access formation for peritoneal dialysis

Abstract

Peritoneal dialysis is an effective method of renal replacement therapy. Currently, different opinions have been put forward as to which catheter implantation technique is preferable for peritoneal dialysis. In this study, the application of the laparoscopic implantation technique for peritoneal dialysis catheter and improving the effectiveness of peritoneal dialysis in patients with stage 5 chronic kidney disease is substantiated. The study included 1,228 patients with stage 5 chronic kidney disease who received medical care by peritoneal dialysis and were observed in 26 dialysis centers between 2000 and 2020. Group 1 received open implantation technique (n = 1105 people; 477 men [43%], 628 women [57%]). The average age at the time of implantation of peritoneal dialysis catheter was 52.4 ± 0.48 years. Group 2 received laparoscopic implantation technique (n = 123; 57 men (46%), 66 women (54%)). At the beginning of 2000, peritoneal dialysis was maintained in 78 patients but was continued in 45 people. The average age at the time of implantation of the peritoneal dialysis catheter was 51.9 ± 1.28 years. Compared with group 1, group 2 demonstrated better “survival” because of the lower dysfunction and catheter loss rates, increased opportunities for using peritoneal dialysis in patients with previous abdominal surgery. In both groups, peritoneal dialysis was mainly terminated because of complications. The technical “survival” of the peritoneal dialysis was significantly higher in women and patients who were overweight in group 2 than in group 1. The proportion of patients without infectious complications was significantly lower in group 2 than in group 1. Thus, laparoscopic implantation of the peritoneal dialysis catheter improves the quality of treatment, expands the indications for its use, and increases peritoneal dialysis “survival”. In addition, both surgical options (open and laparoscopic implantation techniques for peritoneal dialysis catheter) can be employed; however, the laparoscopic technique is preferred in women and patients who are overweight because they reduced the conversion rate to hemodialysis. Accordingly, the introduction of an advanced laparoscopic technique for implanting a peritoneal dialysis catheter into the clinical practice of making access for peritoneal dialysis is necessary.

Keywords

peritoneal dialysis / chronic kidney disease / glomerular diseases / renal replacement therapy / catheter for peritoneal dialysis / laparoscopic technique of implantation of a catheter for peritoneal dialysis / complications of peritoneal dialysis

References

[1] Li PK, Chow KM, Van de Luijtgaarden MW, et al. Changes in the worldwide epidemiology of peritoneal dialysis. Nat Rev Nephrol. 2017;13(2):90–103. doi: 10.1038/nrneph.2016.181

[2] Li P.K., Chow K.M., Van de Luijtgaarden M.W., et al. Changes in the worldwide epidemiology of peritoneal dialysis // Nat Rev Nephrol. 2017. Vol. 13, N 2. P. 90–103. doi: 10.1038/nrneph.2016.181

[3] Mehrotra R, Devuyst O, Davies S, et al. The current state of peritoneal dialysis. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2016;27(11):3238–3252. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2016010112

[4] Mehrotra R., Devuyst O., Davies S., et al. The current state of peritoneal dialysis // J Am Soc Nephrol. 2016. Vol. 27, N 11. P. 3238–3252. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2016010112

[5] Van de Luijtgaarden MWM, Jager KJ. Trends in dialysis modality choice and related patient survival in the ERA-EDTA Registry over a 20-year period. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2016;31(1):120–128. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfv295

[6] Van de Luijtgaarden M.W.M., Jager K.J. Trends in dialysis modality choice and related patient survival in the ERA-EDTA Registry over a 20-year period // Nephrol Dial Transplant.2016. Vol. 31, N 1. P. 120–128. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfv295

[7] Sakurada T, Kaneshiro N, Taki Y, et al. Long-term prognosis of peritoneal dialysis patients with a re-embedded catheter. Adv Perit Dial. 2017;33(2017):31–34.

[8] Sakurada T., Kaneshiro N., Taki Y., et al. Long-term prognosis of peritoneal dialysis patients with a re-embedded catheter // Adv Perit Dial. 2017. Vol. 33. N 2017. P. 31–34.

[9] Tokgoz B. Clinical advantages of peritoneal dialysis. Perit Dial Int. 2009;29(suppl 2):59–61.

[10] Tokgoz B. Clinical advantages of peritoneal dialysis // Perit Dial Int. 2009. Vol. 29. Suppl. 2. P. 59–61.

[11] Li PK, Chow KM, Cho Y, et al. ISPD peritonitis guideline recommendations: 2022 update on prevention and treatment. Perit Dial Int. 2022;42(2):110–153. doi: 10.1177/08968608221080586

[12] Li P.K., Chow K.M., Cho Y., et al. ISPD peritonitis guideline recommendations: 2022 update on prevention and treatment // Perit Dial Int. 2022. Vol. 42, N 2. P. 110–153. doi: 10.1177/08968608221080586

[13] Cheetham MS, Zhao J, McCullough K, et al. International peritoneal dialysis training practices and the risk of peritonitis. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2022;37(5):937–949. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfab298

[14] Cheetham M.S., Zhao J., McCullough K., et al. International peritoneal dialysis training practices and the risk of peritonitis // Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2022. Vol. 37, N 5. P. 937–949. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfab298

[15] Chow KM, Li PK, Cho Y, et al. ISPD catheter-related infection recommendations: 2023. Perit Dial Int. 2023;43(3):201–219. doi: 10.1177/08968608231172740

[16] Chow K.M., Li P.K., Cho Y., et al. ISPD Catheter-related Infection Recommendations: 2023 // Perit Dial Int. 2023.Vol. 43, N 3. P. 201–219. doi: 10.1177/08968608231172740

[17] Rubin HR, Fink NE, Plantinga LC, et al. Patient ratings of dialysis care with peritoneal dialysis vs hemodialysis. JAMA. 2004;291(6): 697–703. doi: 10.1001/jama.291.6.697

[18] Rubin H.R., Fink N.E., Plantinga L.C., et al. Patient ratings of dialysis care with peritoneal dialysis vs hemodialysis // JAMA. 2004. Vol. 291, N 6. P. 697–703. doi: 10.1001/jama.291.6.697

[19] Mehta RL, Cerda J, Burdmann EA, et al. International Society of Nephrology’s 0by25 initiative for acute kidney injury (zero preventable deaths by 2025): A human rights case for nephrology. Lancet. 2015;385(9987):2616–2643. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)60126-X

[20] Mehta R.L., Cerda J., Burdmann E.A., et al. International Society of Nephrology’s 0by25 initiative for acute kidney injury (zero preventable deaths by 2025): A human rights case for nephrology // Lancet. 2015. Vol. 385, N 9987. P. 2616–2643. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)60126-X

[21] Berger A, Edelsberg J, Inglese GW, et al. Cost comparison of peritoneal dialysis versus hemodialysis in end-stage renal disease. Am J Manag Care. 2009;15(8):509–518.

[22] Berger A., Edelsberg J., Inglese G.W., et al. Cost comparison of peritoneal dialysis versus hemodialysis in end-stage renal disease // Am J Manag Care. 2009. Vol. 15, N 8. P. 509–518.

[23] Brum S, Rodrigues A, Rocha S, et al. Moncrief-Popovich technique is an advantageous method of peritoneal dialysis catheter implantation. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2010;25(9):3070–3075. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfq142

[24] Brum S., Rodrigues A., Rocha S., et al. Moncrief-Popovich technique is an advantageous method of peritoneal dialysis catheter implantation // Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2010. Vol. 25. N 9. P. 3070–3075. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfq142

[25] Foundation NK KDOQI clinical practice guidelines and clinical practice recommendations for 2006 updates: hemodialysis adequacy, peritoneal dialysis adequacy and vascular access. Am J Kidney Dis. 2006;48(Suppl. 1):2–90. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2006.03.051

[26] Foundation NK KDOQI clinical practice guidelines and clinical practice recommendations for 2006 updates: hemodialysis adequacy, peritoneal dialysis adequacy and vascular access // Am J Kidney Dis. 2006. Vol. 48. Suppl. 1. P. 2–90. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2006.03.051

[27] Shetty AOG Peritoneal dialysis: its indications and contraindications. Dial Transplant. 2000;29(2):71–77.

[28] Shetty AOG Peritoneal dialysis: its indications and contraindications // Dial Transplant. 2000. Vol. 29, N 2. P. 71–77.

[29] Macheng LU, Cong C, Ye Z. Laparoscopic versus conventional open peritoneal dialysis catheter insertion in china: A Meta-Analysis. Urol J. 2023;20(2):81–89. doi: 10.22037/uj.v20i.7359

[30] Macheng L.U., Cong C., Ye Z. Laparoscopic versus conventional open peritoneal dialysis catheter insertion in china: a meta-analysis // Urol J. 2023. Vol. 20, N 2. P. 81–89. doi: 10.22037/uj.v20i.7359

[31] Qing Q, Leting Z, Kun H. Laparoscopic versus traditional peritoneal dialysis catheter insertion: a meta analysis. Ren Fail. 2016;38(5):838–848. doi: 10.3109/0886022X.2015.1077313

[32] Qing Q., Leting Z., Kun H. Laparoscopic versus traditional peritoneal dialysis catheter insertion: a meta-analysis // Ren Fail. 2016. Vol. 38, N 5. P. 838–848. doi: 10.3109/0886022X.2015.1077313

[33] Sander MH, Jeffrey AL, Ewout WS. Laparoscopic versus open peritoneal dialysis catheter insertion: a meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2013;8(2):e56351. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0056351

[34] Sander M.H., Jeffrey A.L., Ewout W.S. laparoscopic versus open peritoneal dialysis catheter insertion: a meta-analysis // PLoS One. 2013. Vol. 8, N 2. P. e56351. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0056351

[35] Mei-Lan S, Yong Z, Bo W, et al. Randomized controlled trials for comparison of laparoscopic versus conventional open catheter placement in peritoneal dialysis patients: a meta-analysis. BMC Nephrology. 2020;21(1):60. doi: 10.1186/s12882-020-01724-w

[36] Mei-Lan S., Yong Z., Bo W., et al. Randomized controlled trials for comparison of laparoscopic versus conventional open catheter placement in peritoneal dialysis patients: a meta-analysis // BMC Nephrology. 2020. Vol. 21, N 1. P. 60. doi: 10.1186/s12882-020-01724-w

[37] Chen Y, Shao Y, Xu J. The survival and complication rates of laparoscopic versus open catheter placement in peritoneal dialysis patients: a metaanalysis. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2015;25(5):440–443. doi: 10.1097/SLE.0000000000000188

[38] Chen Y., Shao Y., Xu J. The survival and complication rates of laparoscopic versus open catheter placement in peritoneal dialysis patients: a metaanalysis // Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2015. Vol. 25, N 5. P. 440–443. doi: 10.1097/SLE.0000000000000188

[39] Jorinde HH, Van L, Tom C, et al. Randomized controlled trial comparing open versus laparoscopic placement of a peritoneal dialysis catheter and outcomes: the CAPD I trial. Perit Dial Int. 2018;38(2):104–112. doi: 10.3747/pdi.2017.00023

[40] Jorinde H.H., Van L., Tom C., et al. Randomized controlled trial comparing open versus laparoscopic placement of a peritoneal dialysis catheter and outcomes: the CAPD I trial // Perit Dial Int. 2018. Vol. 38, N 2. P. 104–112. doi: 10.3747/pdi.2017.00023

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

Eco-Vector