Сlinical and epidemiological profiles and tactics of patient’s management with myocardial infarction with non-obstructive coronary arteries
D. V. Trishkin , K. S. Shulenin , D. V. Cherkashin , G. G. Kutelev , S. V. Efimov , A. N. Shishkevich , E. E. Bobrovskaya , A. V. Popova , D. S. Bogdanov
Bulletin of the Russian Military Medical Academy ›› 2020, Vol. 22 ›› Issue (4) : 12 -16.
Сlinical and epidemiological profiles and tactics of patient’s management with myocardial infarction with non-obstructive coronary arteries
A comparative analysis of clinical and epidemiological data and results of treatment of 7 patients suffering from myocardial infarction without obstructive coronary artery disease (main group) and 54 patients with their lesions (control group) aged 45,6±9,3 and 62,7±14,2 years, respectively. Both groups were dominated by men (85,7% and 72,2%, respectively). In the main group, dyslipidemia and hypertension were less common (14,3 and 28,6%, respectively) than in the control group (61,1 and 72,2%, respectively). At the same time, the former had a more burdened history of early cardiovascular events in close relatives in 28,6% of cases, and the latter-only in 5,6% of cases. Surgical tactics and features of double antiplatelet therapy in myocardial infarction without obstructive coronary artery disease did not differ from the standard approach. In both groups, active surgical tactics prevailed, consisting in performing percutaneous coronary intervention and installing a coronary stent in the infarct-related artery (85,7 and 83,3%, respectively). The choice of dual antiplatelet therapy in the main group did not differ from the control group and was characterized by a significantly higher frequency of clopidogrel administration (71,4 and 72,2%, respectively). When comparing the left ventricular ejection fraction before and after percutaneous coronary intervention, it turned out that in patients of the main group, in contrast to the control group, the value of the left ventricular ejection fraction did not change significantly (52,5±6,4 and 51,3±9,5, respectively). The etiology and pathogenesis of myocardial damage in patients suffering from myocardial infarction without obstructive coronary artery disease is characterized by significant heterogeneity, which requires additional examinations and differential diagnostics to identify the underlying causes of this condition.
myocardial infarction with non-obstructive coronary arteries / atherothrombosis / thrombophilia / arterial hypertension / dyslipidemia / percutaneous coronary intervention / antithrombotic therapy
| [1] |
Демографический ежегодник России 2019. – М.: Росстат, 2019. – 252 с. |
| [2] |
Дятлов, Н.В. Некоторые особенности патогенеза острого инфаркта миокарда при необструктивном поражении коронарных артерий / Н.В. Дятлов [и др.] // Мед. вестн. Сев. Кавказа. – 2017. – Т. 12, № 3. – С. 260–265. |
| [3] |
Кручинова, С.В. Сравнительный анализ демографических, анамнестических, клинико-лабораторных и инструментальных данных у пациентов с инфарктом миокарда с обструктивным поражением и без обструктивного поражения коронарных артерий / С.В. Кручинова, Е.Д. Космачева, В.А. Порханов // Сиб. мед. журн. – 2018. – Т. 33, № 4. – С. 69–75. |
| [4] |
Рябов, В.В. Острый коронарный синдром с подъемом сегмента ST у пациентов с необструктивным поражением коронарного русла: данные регистра Рекорд-3 / В.В. Рябов [и др.] // Росс. кардиол. журн. – 2017. – Т. 22, № 11. – С. 15–21. |
| [5] |
Рябов, В.В. Магнитно-резонансная томография сердца в дифференциальной диагностике острого коронарного синдрома у больных необструктивным коронарным атеросклерозом / В.В. Рябов [и др.] // Росс. кардиол. журн. – 2017. – № 12. – С. 47–54. |
| [6] |
Рябов, В.В. Инфаркт миокарда без обструктивного коронарного атеросклероза – актуальная проблема неотложной кардиологии / В.В. Рябов, С.Б. Федорова, Е.В. Вышлов // Сиб. мед. журн. – 2018. – Т. 33, № 4. – С. 10–18. |
| [7] |
Шилова, А.С. Инфаркт миокарда без обструктивного атеросклероза коронарных артерий: современное состояние проблемы и подходы к диагностике / А.С. Шилова [и др.] // Клиницист. – 2018. – Т. 12, № 3–4. – С. 10–14. |
| [8] |
Шилова, А.С. Эмболический инфаркт миокарда. Опыт ведения и диагностики / А.С. Шилова [и др.] // Рациональная фармакотерапия в кардиологии. – 2018. – Т. 14, № 3 – С. 361–369. |
| [9] |
Хоанг, Ч.Х. Инфаркт миокарда без обструкции коронарных артерий: современные подходы к диагностике и лечению / Ч.Х. Хоанг [и др.] // Рациональная фармакотерапия в кардиологии. – 2019. – Т. 15, № 6. – С. 881–891. |
| [10] |
Якушин, С.С. Инфаркт миокарда с необструктивным поражением коронарных артерий (МINОСА) – модный термин или новая диагностическая концепция? // Рациональная фармакотерапия в кардиологии. – 2018. – Т. 14, №5. – С. 765–773. |
| [11] |
Agewall, S. ESC working group position paper on myocardial infarction with non-obstructive coronary arteries / S. Agevall [et al.] // Eur. Heart J. – 2017. – Vol. 38, № 3. – P. 143–153. |
| [12] |
Ibanez, B. 2017 ESC Guidelines for the management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation / B. Ibanez [et al.] // Eur. Heart J. – 2018. – Vol. 39, № 2. – P. 119–177. |
| [13] |
Larsen, A.I. Long-term prognosis of patients presenting with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction with no significant coronary artery disease (from the HORIZONSAMI trial) / A.I. Larsen [et al.] // Am. J. Cardiol. – 2013. – Vol. 111, № 5. – P. 643–648. |
| [14] |
Lindahl, B. Medical Therapy for Secondary Prevention and Long-Term Outcome in Patients with Myocardial Infarction with Nonobstructive Coronary Artery Disease / B. Lindahl [et al.] // Circulation. – 2017. – Vol. 135, № 16. – P. 1481–1489. |
| [15] |
Nordenskjöld, A.M. Reinfarction in Patients with Myocardial Infarction with Nonobstructive Coronary Arteries (MINOCA): Coronary Findings and Prognosis / A.M. Nordenskjöld [et al.] // Am. J. Med. – 2019. – Vol. 132, № 3. – P. 335–346. |
| [16] |
Pais, J.L. Psychoemotional disorders as incoming risk factors for myocardial infarction with non-obstructive coronary arteries / J.L. Pais [et al.] // Cardiol. J. – 2018. – Vol. 12, № 1. – P. 24–31. |
| [17] |
Pasupathy, S. Systematic review of patients presenting with suspected myocardial infarction and nonobstructive coronary arteries / S. Pasupathy [et al.] // Circulation. – 2015. – Vol. 131 (10). – P. 861–870. |
| [18] |
Safdar, B. Presentation, Clinical Profile, and Prognosis of Young Patients With Myocardial Infarction With Nonobstructive Coronary Arteries (MINOCA): Results From the VIRGO Study / B. Safdar [et al.] // J. Am. Heart. Assoc. – 2018. – Vol. 7, № 13. – P. 1–14. |
| [19] |
Tamis-Holland, J.E. Contemporary Diagnosis and Management of Patients With Myocardial Infarction in the Absence of Obstructive Coronary Artery Disease: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association / J.E. Tamis-Holland [et al.] // Circulation. – 2019. – Vol. 139, № 18. – P. 891–908. |
| [20] |
Thygesen, K. Fourth universal definition of myocardial infarction (2018) / K. Thygesen [et al.] // Eur. Heart J. – 2019. – Vol. 40, № 3. – P. 237–269. |
Trishkin D.V., Shulenin K.S., Cherkashin D.V., Kutelev G.G., Efimov S.V., Shishkevich A.N., Bobrovskaya E.E., Popova A.V., Bogdanov D.S.
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |