Dynamics of the prevalence of diseases that complicated the course of childbirth and the postpartum period (based on the materials of the Samara region)

Igor A. Shmelev , Sergey N. Cherkasov , Mikhail G. Karailanov

Bulletin of the Russian Military Medical Academy ›› 2024, Vol. 26 ›› Issue (2) : 225 -232.

PDF
Bulletin of the Russian Military Medical Academy ›› 2024, Vol. 26 ›› Issue (2) : 225 -232. DOI: 10.17816/brmma607351
Original Study Article
research-article

Dynamics of the prevalence of diseases that complicated the course of childbirth and the postpartum period (based on the materials of the Samara region)

Author information +
History +
PDF

Abstract

The prevalence of diseases that complicated childbirth and the postpartum period in the Samara region for the period 2009–2021 was investigated. The study was performed based on the official statistical reporting of the Samara region according to a standard scheme. The structure of pathological conditions was assessed. Then, the dynamics were analyzed, and modeling and medium-term forecasting were conducted. Structure analysis was carried out based on the 2016 data. Forecast was performed for the medium term (5 years). Notably, premature rupture of membranes (55.8%) is the most common complication of childbirth and in the postpartum period, followed by obstructed labor (11.4%), childbirth complicated by umbilical cord pathology (10%), childbirth complicated by hypertensive disorders such as preeclampsia and eclampsia (9.3%), and various labor disorders (9.1%). However, the considered conditions indicated in the official statistical reporting explain only 61.1% of all complications of childbirth and in the postpartum period, and 38.9% of all conditions remain unknown, which makes prevention, timely diagnosis, and effective treatment of these conditions challenging. The underreporting of cases of hypertensive disorders during pregnancy is evidenced by their higher frequency during childbirth. Only 25%–30% are complications during pregnancy of the number of complications of this pathology during childbirth and the postpartum period, and the downward trend in the prevalence of this complication during pregnancy is combined with an upward trend during childbirth and the postpartum period. The prevalence of all major extragenital complications during labor and the postpartum period showed a downward trend, except diabetes mellitus. The complexity of the analysis lies in the fact that the level of registration of the same pathological conditions during pregnancy and childbirth and in the postpartum period is extremely different. The data obtained indicate the need for improving the early diagnosis of gestosis and statistical recording of complications of pregnancy and childbirth and provide basis for improving the system of monitoring pregnant women and correct diagnosis of pathology in early pregnancy.

Keywords

public health / morbidity / statistical reporting / pregnancy complication / rupture of membranes / difficult childbirth / preeclampsia / eclampsia / extragenital complications

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Igor A. Shmelev, Sergey N. Cherkasov, Mikhail G. Karailanov. Dynamics of the prevalence of diseases that complicated the course of childbirth and the postpartum period (based on the materials of the Samara region). Bulletin of the Russian Military Medical Academy, 2024, 26(2): 225-232 DOI:10.17816/brmma607351

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

Frolova OG. Organization of primary obstetric and gynecological care at the present stage. Russian Medical Journal. 2008;(2):7–11. EDN: JSEBGL

[2]

Фролова О.Г. Организация первичной акушерско-гинекологической помощи на современном этапе // Российский медицинский журнал. 2008. № 2. С. 7–11. EDN: JSEBGL

[3]

Yakovleva TV, Baranov AA. State policy in the field of children’s health protection: problems and tasks. Issues of Modern Pediatrics. 2009;(2):3–7. EDN: KXFTOD

[4]

Яковлева Т.В., Баранов А.А. Государственная политика в области охраны здоровья детей: проблемы и задачи // Вопросы современной педиатрии. 2009. № 2. С. 3–7. EDN: KXFTOD

[5]

Shapovalova MA. Socio-economic aspects of population reproduction. Health Economics. 2004;(4):12–16. (In Russ.) EDN: WEJVCV

[6]

Шаповалова М.А. Социально-экономические аспекты воспроизводства населения // Экономика здравоохранения. 2004. № 4. С. 12–16. EDN: WEJVCV

[7]

Cherkasov SN. Ways to optimize the model of outpatient monitoring of pregnant women in a large city [dissertation abstract]. Kazan; 2002. 35 с. (In Russ.)

[8]

Черкасов С.Н. Пути оптимизации модели амбулаторного мониторинга беременных женщин в условиях крупного города: автореф. дис. ... д-ра мед. наук. Казань, 2002. 35 с.

[9]

Genovese U, Del Sordo S, Casali M, et al. A new paradigm on health care accountability to improve the quality of the system: four parameters to achieve individual and collective accountability. J Glob Health. 2017;7(1):010301. doi: 10.7189/jogh.07.010301

[10]

Genovese U., Del Sordo S., Casali M., et al. A new paradigm on health care accountability to improve the quality of the system: four parameters to achieve individual and collective accountability // J Glob Health. 2017. Vol. 7, No. 1. Р. 010301. doi: 10.7189/jogh.07.010301

[11]

Meshkov D, Bezmelnitsyna L, Cherkasov S. A data management model for proactive risk management in healthcare. Advances in Systems Science and Applications. 2020;20(1):114–118. EDN: ZTMDMZ doi: 10.25728/assa.2020.20.1.864

[12]

Meshkov D., Bezmelnitsyna L., Cherkasov S. A data management model for proactive risk management in healthcare // Advances in Systems Science and Applications. 2020. Vol. 20, No. 1. Р. 114–118. EDN: ZTMDMZ doi: 10.25728/assa.2020.20.1.864

[13]

Kakorina EP, et al. Basic indicators of maternal and child health, activities of the child protection and Maternity services in the Russian Federation: statistical materials. Moscow; 2018. 170 p. (In Russ.)

[14]

Какорина Е.П., и др. Основные показатели здоровья матери и ребенка, деятельность службы охраны детства и родовспоможения в Российской Федерации: статистические материалы. Москва: ЦНИИОИЗ Минздрава России, 2018. 170 с.

[15]

Sharapova OV, Mingazova EN, Nesterov AS, et al. Analytical review of regulatory and organizational support for the activities of the perinatal service in the Russian Federation (2000–2020). Problems of social hygiene, healthcare and the history of medicine. 2021;29(4):885–891. EDN: UGUUNJ doi: 10.32687/0869-866X-2021-29-4-885-891

[16]

Шарапова О.В., Мингазова Э.Н., Нестеров А.С., и др. Аналитический обзор нормативного и организационного обеспечения деятельности перинатальной службы в Российской Федерации (2000–2020) // Проблемы социальной гигиены, здравоохранения и истории медицины. 2021. Т. 29, № 4. С. 885–891. EDN: UGUUNJ doi: 10.32687/0869-866X-2021-29-4-885-891

[17]

Kamaev YuO, Cherkasov SN, Cherkasova SV, et al. Status of pregnancy health in the russian federation from 2000 to 2015. Bulletin of Semashko National Research Institute of Public Health. 2017;(7):37–44. (In Russ.) EDN: YVHECH

[18]

Камаев Ю.О., Черкасов С.Н., Черкасова С.В., и др. Состояние здоровья беременных в Российской Федерации за период с 2000 по 2015 год // Бюллетень Национального научно-исследовательского института общественного здоровья имени Н.А. Семашко. 2017. № 7. С. 37–44. EDN: YVHECH

[19]

Lineva OI, Hashina OA, Shmelev IA. Profession of an obstetrician-gynecologist: the view of a clinician, psychologist and lawyer: monograph. Samara: Etching; 2010. 367 р. (In Russ.) EDN: QLZSIV

[20]

Линева О.И., Хашина О.А., Шмелев И.А. Профессия акушера-гинеколога: взгляд клинициста, психолога и юриста: монография. Самара: Офорт, 2010. 367 с. EDN: QLZSIV

[21]

Konovalov O, Kharitonov A, Shmelev IA. Priority areas for improving the work of a regional perinatal center. Doctor. 2020;31(1):76–79. EDN: UUZNRR doi: 10.29296/25877305-2020-01-16

[22]

Коновалов О., Харитонов А., Шмелев И.А. Приоритетные направления совершенствования работы областного перинатального центра // Врач. 2020. Т. 31, № 1. С. 76–79. EDN: UUZNRR doi: 10.29296/25877305-2020-01-16

[23]

Shmelev IA. Medical activity and gynecological morbidity of women of various ages. Bulletin of the Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia. Series: Medicine. 2015;(3):14–17. EDN: UIJSHH

[24]

Шмелев И.А. Медицинская активность и гинекологическая заболеваемость женщин различного возраста // Вестник Российского университета дружбы народов. Серия: Медицина. 2015. № 3. С. 14–17. EDN: UIJSHH

[25]

Sirotko ML, Cherkasov SN. Assessment of the health status of the population of the Samara region. Bulletin of Semashko National Research Institute of Public Health. 2015;(2):209–212. (In Russ.) EDN: UKFBUX

[26]

Сиротко М.Л., Черкасов С.Н. Оценка состояния здоровья населения Самарской области // Бюллетень Национального научно-исследовательского института общественного здоровья имени Н.А. Семашко. 2015. № 2. С. 209–212. EDN: UKFBUX

[27]

Ogul LA, Shapovalova MA, Yaroslavtsev AS. Population reproduction. International Journal of Applied and Fundamental Research. 2011;(11):68. (In Russ.) EDN: OFVUQN

[28]

Огуль Л.А., Шаповалова М.А., Ярославцев А.С. Воспроизводство населения // Международный журнал прикладных и фундаментальных исследований. 2011. № 11. С. 68. EDN: OFVUQN

[29]

Breusov AV, Konovalov OE, Kharitonov AK, et al. Socio-demographic characteristics and health status of women of fertile age in the Moscow region. Saratov Scientific and Medical Journal. 2019;15(1):72–77. (In Russ.) EDN: QWTJYU

[30]

Бреусов А.В., Коновалов О.Е., Харитонов А.К., и др. Социально-демографическая характеристика и состояние здоровья женщин фертильного возраста Московской области // Саратовский научно-медицинский журнал. 2019. Т. 15, № 1. С. 72–77. EDN: QWTJYU

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

Eco-Vector

AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF

143

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

AI思维导图

/