Resource-saving peloidotherapy techniques in the rehabilitation of patients after microdiscectomy
Alexander G. Kulikov , Tatiana Yu. Gaidukova , Natalia V. Lvova
Russian Journal of Physiotherapy, Balneology and Rehabilitation ›› 2023, Vol. 22 ›› Issue (1) : 33 -40.
Resource-saving peloidotherapy techniques in the rehabilitation of patients after microdiscectomy
BACKGROUND: Intervertebral disc herniations are a common neurosurgical problem. However, there is practically no information about the effectiveness of using non-thermal gentle methods of peloid therapy using peat mud in patients after spinal surgery for disc herniations, about the indications for their use depending on the existing clinical and functional characteristics.
AIM: to develop and scientifically substantiate the use of resource-saving non-thermal peloidotherapy techniques in the rehabilitation of patients after spinal surgery for herniated discs.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: 74 patients aged 20 to 65 years were examined 4–9 weeks after microdiscectomy. Patients underwent clinical and functional examination before and after the rehabilitation course, pain intensity was determined using a visual analog scale (VAS). Functional activity was assessed using the "Get up and go" test (3 and 6 meters). Infrared thermography of the back and lower extremities was performed. The study used the Oswestry questionnaire, as well as the HADS Anxiety and Depression Scale. By simple randomization, all patients were divided into 2 main groups (25 people each) and a control group (24 people). The control group received basic treatment ― therapeutic gymnastics and massage of the lower limb on the affected side. In the I main group, 10 procedures of thin-layer mud applications were additionally prescribed. In the II main group, 10 procedures of fluctuophoresis of peat mud solution were prescribed for basic treatment. The rehabilitation course lasted 14–15 days.
RESULTS: Repeated examination after the course of treatment showed a significant decrease in the VAS index in both main groups, more significant in group II, whereas in the control group the changes were not significant. In all the studied groups, there was a reduction in the execution time of the "Get up and Go" test, but it was most significant in both main groups. Positive shifts on the Oswestry scale were also observed in all groups, including the control group, but some advantage was determined in the main groups receiving peloid therapy. Analysis of repeated results of remote infrared thermography revealed a decrease in local hyperthermia in the area of surgical intervention in persons receiving non-thermal peloid therapy techniques, the most significant in the II main group. Indicators of anxiety on the HADS scale decreased by the end of rehabilitation in all the studied groups, and subclinical manifestations of depression ― only in the I and II main groups.
CONCLUSION: The inclusion of non-thermal resource-saving peloidotherapy techniques in the rehabilitation complex of patients after microdiscectomy makes it possible to more effectively relieve pain syndrome, eliminate microhemodynamic disorders and increase the motor activity of patients, which contributes to the normalization of their psychoemotional state and the quality of their life. These methods are not load-bearing, have a minimum number of contraindications to the appointment, does not require significant material costs and can be applied in various medical organizations.
mud treatment / microdiscectomy / rehabilitation / peloidotherapy / fluctuating currents
| [1] |
Arestov SO, Gushcha AO, Kashcheev AA, et al. Modern approaches to the treatment of herniated discs of the lumbosacral spine. Nervous Dis. 2017;(3):19–23. (In Russ). |
| [2] |
Арестов С.О., Гуща А.О., Кащеев А.А., и др. Современные подходы к лечению грыж межпозвонковых дисков пояснично-крестцового отдела позвоночника // Нервные болезни. 2017. № 3. С. 19–23. |
| [3] |
Beloborodov VA, Stepanov IA. Percutaneous laser decompression of intervertebral discs and microdiscectomy in degenerative disease of lumbar intervertebral discs: Results of a randomized controlled trial. Bulletin Sur named after I.I. Grekov. 2021;(4):57–64. (In Russ). |
| [4] |
Белобородов В.А., Степанов И.А. Чрескожная лазерная декомпрессия межпозвонковых дисков и микродискэктомия при дегенеративном заболевании поясничных межпозвонковых дисков: результаты рандомизированного контролируемого исследования // Вестник хирургии имени И.И. Грекова. 2021. № 4. С. 57–64. |
| [5] |
Vangen-LØnne V, Madsbu MA, Salvesen O, et al. Microdiscectomy for lumbar disc herniation: A single-center observational study. World Neurosurg. 2020;(137):e577–e583. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2020.02.056 |
| [6] |
Vangen-LØnne V., Madsbu M.A., Salvesen O., et al. Microdiscectomy for lumbar disc herniation: A single-center observational study // World Neurosurg. 2020. N 137. Р. e577–e583. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2020.02.056 |
| [7] |
Willhuber CG, Kido G, Mereles M, et al. Factors associated with lumbar disc hernia recurrence after microdiscectomy. Rev Esp Cir Ortop Traumatol. 2017;61(6):397–403. doi: 10.1016/j.recot.2017.07.002 |
| [8] |
Willhuber C.G., Kido G., Mereles M., et al. Factors associated with lumbar disc hernia recurrence after microdiscectomy // Rev Esp Cir Ortop Traumatol. 2017. Vol. 61, N 6. Р. 397–403. doi: 10.1016/j.recot.2017.07.002 |
| [9] |
Calikoglu C, Cakir M. Open discectomy vs. microdiscectomy: Results from 519 patients operated for lumbar disc herniation. Eurasian J Med. 2018;50(3):178–818. doi: 10.5152/eurasianjmed.2018.18016 |
| [10] |
Calikoglu C., Cakir M. Open discectomy vs. microdiscectomy: Results from 519 patients operated for lumbar disc herniation // Eurasian J Med. 2018. Vol. 50, N 3. Р. 178–818. doi: 10.5152/eurasianjmed.2018.18016 |
| [11] |
Dreval ON, Kuznetsov AV, Chekhov VA, et al. Pathogenetic aspects and risk factors for the recurrence of a herniated disc of the lumbar spine: Literature review. Spine Sur. 2021;18(1):47–52. (In Russ). doi: 10.14531/ss2021.1.47-52 |
| [12] |
Древаль О.Н., Кузнецов А.В., Чехонацкий В.А., и др. Патогенетические аспекты и факторы риска развития рецидива грыжи диска поясничного отдела позвоночника: обзор литературы // Хирургия позвоночника. 2021. Т. 18, № 1. С. 47–52. doi: 10.14531/ss2021.1.47-52 |
| [13] |
Alizadeh R, Sharifzadeh SR. Pathogenesis, etiology and treatment of failed back surgery syndrome. Neurochirurgie. 2022;68(4):426–431. doi: 10.1016/j.neuchi.2021.09.005 |
| [14] |
Alizadeh R., Sharifzadeh S.R. Pathogenesis, etiology and treatment of failed back surgery syndrome // Neurochirurgie. 2022. Vol. 68, N 4. Р. 426–431. doi: 10.1016/j.neuchi.2021.09.005 |
| [15] |
Kashcheev AA, Gushcha AO, Arestov SO. General principles of treatment and rehabilitation of patients after operations for degenerative-dystrophic lesions of the lumbosacral spine. Russ Med J. 2012;20(31):1548–1551. (In Russ). |
| [16] |
Кащеев А.А., Гуща А.О., Арестов С.О. Общие принципы лечения и реабилитации пациентов после операций по поводу дегенеративно-дистрофических поражений пояснично-крестцового отдела позвоночника // Русский медицинский журнал. 2012. Т. 20, № 31. С. 1548–1551. |
| [17] |
Prokopovich VS, Parfenov VA. Rehabilitation of patients after lumbar microdiscectomy. Neurol Neuropsychiatry Psychosomatics. 2021;13(4):60–65. (In Russ). |
| [18] |
Прокопович В.С., Парфенов В.А. Реабилитация пациентов после поясничной микродискэктомии // Неврология, нейропсихиатрия, психосоматика. 2021. Т. 13, № 4. С. 60–65. |
| [19] |
Borodulina IV, Arestov SO, Mukhina AA, et al. Personalized approach to postoperative rehabilitation of patients with degenerative spinal injury. Nervous Dis. 2021;(2):14–19. (In Russ). doi: 10.24412/2226-0757-2021-12321 |
| [20] |
Бородулина И.В., Арестов С.О., Мухина А.А., и др. Персонифицированный подход к послеоперационной реабилитации пациентов с дегенеративным поражением позвоночника // Нервные болезни. 2021. № 2. С. 14–19. doi: 10.24412/2226-0757-2021-12321 |
| [21] |
Cerezci O, Başak AT. Importance of physiotherapy after lumbar microdiscectomy. Turk Neurosurg. 2023;33(1):150–155. doi: 10.5137/1019-5149 |
| [22] |
Cerezci O., Başak A.T. Importance of physiotherapy after lumbar microdiscectomy // Turk Neurosurg. 2023. Vol. 33, N 1. Р. 150–155. doi: 10.5137/1019-5149 |
| [23] |
Byvaltsev VA, Titova NM, Sorokovikov VA, et al. Enhancement of the therapeutic effect when hyperbaric oxygenation is included in the complex conservative therapy of patients with cicatricial-adhesive epiduritis. Clin Neurol. 2009;(3):24–27. (In Russ). |
| [24] |
Бывальцев В.А., Титова Н.М., Сороковиков В.А., и др. Усиление лечебного эффекта при включении гипербарической оксигенации в комплексную консервативную терапию пациентов с рубцово-спаечным эпидуритом // Клиническая неврология. 2009. № 3. С. 24–27. |
| [25] |
Gorelikov AE, Melnikova EA, Razumov AN, et al. Rehabilitation of patients with operated spine syndrome with a complicated course of the postoperative period after discectomy. Problems of Balneology, Physiotherapy and Exercise Therapy. 2017;94(5):40–47. (In Russ). doi: 10.17116/kurort201794540-47 |
| [26] |
Гореликов А.Е., Мельникова Е.А., Разумов А.Н., и др. Реабилитация больных с синдромом оперированного позвоночника с осложненным течением послеоперационного периода после дискэктомии // Вопросы курортологии, физиотерапии и лечебной физической культуры. 2017. Т. 94, № 5. С. 40–47. doi: 10.17116/kurort201794540-47 |
| [27] |
Patent RUS No. 2147897 C1. Levitsky EF, Miryutova NF, Udaly IF, Velbik IV. Method of treatment of neurological manifestations in patients with postlaminoectomy syndrome. (In Russ). Available from: https://yandex.ru/patents/doc/RU2147897C1_20000427. Accessed: 15.11.2022. |
| [28] |
Патент РФ на изобретение № 2147897 С1. Левицкий Е.Ф., Мирютова Н.Ф., Удалый И.Ф., Вельбик И.В. Способ лечения неврологических проявлений у больных постламиноэктомическим синдромом. Режим доступа: https://yandex.ru/patents/doc/RU2147897C1_20000427. Дата обращения: 15.11.2022. |
| [29] |
Blokhina, VN, Melikyan EG. Assessment of anxiety and pain syndrome in patients with lumbosacral radiculopathy in the early rehabilitation period after microdiscectomy when using various rehabilitation programs. Almanac Clin Med. 2020;48(1):13–21. (In Russ). doi: 10.18786/2072-0505-2020-48-004 |
| [30] |
Блохина, В.Н., Меликян Э.Г. Оценка тревожности и болевого синдрома у пациентов с пояснично-крестцовой радикулопатией в раннем реабилитационном периоде после микродискэктомии при применении различных реабилитационных программ // Альманах клинической медицины. 2020. Т. 48, № 1. С. 13–21. doi: 10.18786/2072-0505-2020-48-004 |
| [31] |
Kildebekova RN, Abdrakhmanova SM, Salakhov EM, Kamalova ZR. Evaluation of the effectiveness of peloidotherapy in the complex treatment of patients with osteochondrosis of the spine in outpatient conditions. Med Bulletin Bashkortostan. 2012;7(1):49–52. (In Russ). |
| [32] |
Кильдебекова Р.Н., Абдрахманова С.М., Салахов Э.М., Камалова З.Р. Оценка эффективности пелоидотерапии в комплексном лечении больных остеохондрозом позвоночника в амбулаторно-поликлинических условиях // Медицинский вестник Башкортостана. 2012. Т. 7, № 1. С. 49–52. |
| [33] |
Kulikov AG, Voronina DD, Luppova IV, Abramovich SG. A new approach to rehabilitation of patients after surgical treatment of herniated discs. Medico-Social Expertise Rehabilitation. 2016;19(3):125–128. (In Russ). doi: 10.18821/1560-9537-2016-19-3-125-128 |
| [34] |
Куликов А.Г., Воронина Д.Д., Луппова И.В., Абрамович С.Г. Новый подход к реабилитации пациентов после оперативного лечения грыж межпозвонковых дисков // Медико-социальная экспертиза и реабилитация. 2016. Т. 19, № 3. С. 125–128. doi: 10.18821/1560-9537-2016-19-3-125-128 |
| [35] |
Kulikov AG, Luppova IV, Makarova IN, et al. Principles of early restorative treatment of patients after minimally invasive surgery for discogenic radiculopathy. Moscow 2016. 53 p. (In Russ). |
| [36] |
Куликов А.Г., Луппова И.В., Макарова И.Н., и др. Принципы раннего восстановительного лечения больных после минимально-инвазивных операций при дискогенных радикулопатиях. Москва, 2016. 53 с. |
Eco-Vector
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |