HEMODYNAMIC EFFICACY OF ELECTRICAL STIMULATION OF CRURAL MUSCLES

L. A Laberko , V. E Barinov , K. V Lobastov , N. A Barmotin

Russian Journal of Physiotherapy, Balneology and Rehabilitation ›› 2012, Vol. 11 ›› Issue (6) : 12 -15.

PDF
Russian Journal of Physiotherapy, Balneology and Rehabilitation ›› 2012, Vol. 11 ›› Issue (6) : 12 -15. DOI: 10.17816/41303
Articles
research-article

HEMODYNAMIC EFFICACY OF ELECTRICAL STIMULATION OF CRURAL MUSCLES

Author information +
History +
PDF

Abstract

Ultrasound duplex angioscanning with colour mapping of the blood low and construction of the Doppler curve were employed to study characteristics of regional venous hemodynamics in the popliteal vein during active muscle contraction (AMC)/relaxation and electromyostimulation (EMS) of crural muscles using a Veinoplus device. It was shown that peak blood flow velocity at rest equaled 15.9 cm/s and substantially increased by 3.5 and 4.8 times in case of AMC and EMS respectively. The volumetric blood flow at rest was 223 ml/min and increased by 1.6 and 1.2 times in case of AMC and EMS respectively (the difference is significant). Scanning of sural sinuses revealed a decrease of their diameter up to complete occlusion under effect of AMC. Regression analysis showed that the hemodynamic response to EMS depends largely on anatomic features of crural muscles but not their functional state.

Keywords

hemodynamic efficacy / crural electromyostimulation

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
L. A Laberko, V. E Barinov, K. V Lobastov, N. A Barmotin. HEMODYNAMIC EFFICACY OF ELECTRICAL STIMULATION OF CRURAL MUSCLES. Russian Journal of Physiotherapy, Balneology and Rehabilitation, 2012, 11(6): 12-15 DOI:10.17816/41303

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

Лаберко Л. А., Баринов В. Е., Лобастое К. В. и др. // Физиотер., бальнеол. и реабил. - 2012. - № 1. - С. 13-17.

[2]

Broderick B. J., O’Briain D. E., Breen P. P. et al. // Med. Engineer. Phys. - 2010. - Vol. 32, N 4. - P. 349-355.

[3]

Clarke Moloney M., Lyons G. M., Breen P. et al. // Eur. J. Vasc. Endovasc. Surg. - 2006. - Vol. 31. - P. 300-305.

[4]

Faghri P. D., Van Meerdervort H. F., Glaser R. M., Figoni S. F. // EEE Trans. Rehabil. Eng. - 1997. - Vol. 5, N 1. - P. 62-69.

[5]

Griffin M., Nicolaides A. N., Bond D. et al. // Eur. J. Vasc. Endovasc. Surg. - 2010. - Vol. 40, N 6. - P. 766-771.

[6]

Janssen T. W., Hopman M. T. // Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. - 2003. -Vol. 84, N 7. - P. 982-987.

[7]

Laverick M. D., McGivern R. C., Crone M. D., Mollan R. A. B. // Phlebology. - 1990. - Vol. 5. - P. 285-290.

[8]

Lindström B., Holmdahl C., Jonsson O. et al. // Br. J. Surg. - 1982. -Vol. 69, N 11. - P. 633-637.

[9]

Lyons G. M., Leane G. E., Grace P. A. // Eur. J. Vasc. Endovasc. Surg. - 2002. - Vol. 23, N 6. - P. 564-566.

[10]

Nicolaides N., Kakkar V. V., Field E. S., Fish P. // Br. Med. J. - 1972. - Vol. 3, N 5829. - P. 756-758.

[11]

Papaioannou T. G., Stefanadis C. // Hellenic. J. Cardiol. - 2005. -Vol. 46, N 1. - P. 9-15.

[12]

Reed B. // Pediatr. Phys. Ther. - 1997. - Vol. 9. - P. 96-102.

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

Eco-Vector

AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF

125

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

AI思维导图

/