Lichen sclerosus et atrophicans in men: clinical efficacy of hydrobiont collagenase isoenzymes electrophoresis in the rehabilitation phase

Andrei V. Ignatovskiy , Anton R. Zhelonkin , Angelina O. Zhelonkina

Russian Journal of Physiotherapy, Balneology and Rehabilitation ›› 2021, Vol. 20 ›› Issue (3) : 247 -252.

PDF
Russian Journal of Physiotherapy, Balneology and Rehabilitation ›› 2021, Vol. 20 ›› Issue (3) : 247 -252. DOI: 10.17816/1681-3456-2021-20-247-252
Original studies
research-article

Lichen sclerosus et atrophicans in men: clinical efficacy of hydrobiont collagenase isoenzymes electrophoresis in the rehabilitation phase

Author information +
History +
PDF

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In view of the lacking ineffectiveness of the currently established treatment methods of men with genital lichen sclerosus (GLS), as well as the lack of evidence-based ways of managing patients at the rehabilitation stage, there exists a want for new approaches to solve this problem.

AIMS: The aim of the research was to study the possibility of applying electrophoresis of an enzyme preparation from hydrobiont collagenases at the stage of rehabilitation in men with GLS.

MATERIAL AND METHODS: Open-label randomized controlled trial comparing clinical efficacy of hydrobiont enzyme preparation and standard supportive emollient therapy at the stage of rehabilitation in men with confirmed GLS was conducted. The follow-up period lasted for 16 weeks. Clinical efficacy was estimated using specifically developed scores LS-S (surface area), LS-A (disease activity) and validated dermatologic life quality index (DLQI) at 6th and 16th week of follow-up. The primary study outcome was the comparative efficacy at 16th week as based on the evaluated scores.

RESULTS: All patients (n=27) were given topical glucocorticoids (TGCs) at the first stage of the study during the first 6 weeks. The patients were then randomly allocated into 2 groups for the rehabilitation stage that lasted from 6th to 16th week of the study. The first group (primary group, n=13) were managed with electrophoresis of an enzyme preparation from hydrobiont collagenases. The second group (control group, n=14) were managed with emollients at the rehab stage. The age of patients in the first group and in the second group was 36,62±16,04 and 41,93±9,34 years, respectively. At baseline before initiating treatment patients in both groups as judged by LS-S (p=0,110), LS-A (p=0,757) и DLQI (p=0,149) comparable. At 6th week after course of TGCs no statistically significant differences were detected. At the primary study outcome at 16th week scores LS-S (p=0,002), LS-A (р <0,001) and DLQI (р <0,001) evidenced significantly in favour of enzyme electrophoresis.

CONCLUSION: During staged treatment, a more pronounced and long-lasting effect was observed in the group of patients with electrophoresis of the enzyme complex during the rehabilitation stage compared to the group with emollients

Keywords

lichen sclerosus et atrophicans / balanitis xerotica obliterans / male patients / index score / quality of life / rehabilitation

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Andrei V. Ignatovskiy, Anton R. Zhelonkin, Angelina O. Zhelonkina. Lichen sclerosus et atrophicans in men: clinical efficacy of hydrobiont collagenase isoenzymes electrophoresis in the rehabilitation phase. Russian Journal of Physiotherapy, Balneology and Rehabilitation, 2021, 20(3): 247-252 DOI:10.17816/1681-3456-2021-20-247-252

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

Kizer WS, Prarie T, Morey AF. Balanitis xerotica obliterans: epidemiologic distribution in an equal access health care system. South Med J. 2003;96(1):9–11. doi: 10.1097/00007611-200301000-00004

[2]

Kizer W.S., Prarie T., Morey A.F. Balanitis xerotica obliterans: epidemiologic distribution in an equal access health care system // South Med J. 2003. Vol. 96, N 1. P. 9–11. doi: 10.1097/00007611-200301000-00004

[3]

Pugliese JM, Morey AF, Peterson AC. Lichen sclerosus: review of literature and current recommendations for management. J Urol. 2007;178(6):2268–2276. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2007.08.024

[4]

Pugliese J.M., Morey A.F., Peterson A.C. Lichen sclerosus: review of literature and current recommendations for management // J Urol. 2007. Vol. 178, N 6. P. 2268–2276. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2007.08.024

[5]

Nasca MR, Innocenzi D, Micali G. Penile cancer among patients with genital lichen sclerosus. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1999;41(6):911–914. doi: 10.1016/s0190-9622(99)70245-8

[6]

Nasca M.R., Innocenzi D., Micali G. Penile cancer among patients with genital lichen sclerosus // J Am Acad Dermatol. 1999. Vol. 41, N 6. P. 911–914. doi: 10.1016/s0190-9622(99)70245-8

[7]

Edmonds EV, Hunt S, Hawkins D, et al. Clinical parameters in male genital lichen sclerosus: a case series of 329 patients. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2012;26(6):730–737. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-3083.2011.04155.x

[8]

Edmonds E.V., Hunt S., Hawkins D., et al. Clinical parameters in male genital lichen sclerosus: a case series of 329 patients // J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2012. Vol. 26, N 6. P. 730–737. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-3083.2011.04155.x

[9]

Lewis FM, Tatnall FM, Velangi SS. British Assotiations of Dermatologists guidelines for the management of lichen sclerosus, 2018. Br J Dermatol. 2018;178(4):839–853. doi: 10.1111/bjd.16241

[10]

Lewis F.M., Tatnall F.M., Velangi S.S. British Assotiations of Dermatologists guidelines for the management of lichen sclerosus, 2018 // Br J Dermatol. 2018. Vol. 178, N 4. P. 839–853. doi: 10.1111/bjd.16241

[11]

Sokolova AA, Zatorskaya NF, Medvedeva OV, et al. Modern approaches to therapy and management of men with genital sclerotrophic lichen. Clin Dermatol Venereol. 2017;16(1):70–73. (In Russ). doi: 10.17116/klinderma201716370-74

[12]

Соколова А.А., Заторская Н.Ф., Медведева О.В., и др. Современные подходы к терапии и ведению мужчин, больных генитальным склероатрофическим лихеном // Клиническая дерматология и венерология. 2017. Т. 16, № 3. С. 70–73. doi: 10.17116/klinderma201716370-74

[13]

Karpova TN. Fermenkol ultraphonophoresis in the correction and prevention of scars. Physiotherapist. 2009;4:38–39. (In Russ).

[14]

Карпова Т.Н. Ультрафонофорез ферменкола в коррекции и профилактике рубцов // Физиотерапевт. 2009. № 4. С. 38–39.

[15]

Karpova TN, Matytsin VO. Evaluation of the effectiveness of the use of Fermenkol for the prevention and correction of scars. Physiotherapist. 2008;6:53–54. (In Russ).

[16]

Карпова Т.Н., Матыцин В.О. Оценка эффективности применения средства «Ферменкол» в целях профилактики и коррекции рубцов // Физиотерапевт. 2008. № 6. С. 53–54.

[17]

Kondratieva YS, Filinova SO. Enzyme preparations in the therapy of sclerotrophic lichen of the external genitalia in women. Bulletin Med Sci. 2017;4(8):56–60. (In Russ). doi: 10.31684/2541-8475.2017.4(8).56-60

[18]

Кондратьева Ю.С., Филинова С.О. Ферментные препараты в терапии склероатрофического лихена наружных половых органов у женщин // Бюллетень медицинской науки. 2017. Т. 4, № 8. С. 56–60. doi: 10.31684/2541-8475.2017.4(8).56-60

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

Eco-Vector

AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF

122

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

AI思维导图

/