Evaluation of skin ultrasound diagnostics criteria as a prognostic factor for prevention of adverse events after monopolar radio wave exposure

Irina P. Aksenenko , Marina Yu. Gerasimenko

Russian Journal of Physiotherapy, Balneology and Rehabilitation ›› 2019, Vol. 18 ›› Issue (3) : 140 -144.

PDF
Russian Journal of Physiotherapy, Balneology and Rehabilitation ›› 2019, Vol. 18 ›› Issue (3) : 140 -144. DOI: 10.17816/1681-3456-2019-18-3-140-144
Original studies
research-article

Evaluation of skin ultrasound diagnostics criteria as a prognostic factor for prevention of adverse events after monopolar radio wave exposure

Author information +
History +
PDF

Abstract

The study presents data from ultrasound examination of patients’ skin in dynamics before and after exposure to the monopolar radio frequency method.

There were 41 patients aged 38 to 45 years under observation, who were divided into 2 groups: with deformed and fine-wrinkled skin types. In all groups, a single exposure was performed using the monopolar radio frequency method on the Thermage device according to the approved Protocol of operation in the face area of 1200 pulses. Objective research methods included ultrasound diagnostics before treatment, 1, 3 and 6 months after treatment. It also determined the Dermatological Quality of Life Index. The results were evaluated 1, 3 and 6 months after the treatment. The obtained data of ultrasound examination of the skin showed that the best changes in the dermis high-frequency radio wave method gave a more pronounced initial thickness of the dermis and was more effective in the deformation type of skin aging compared to fine wrinkles.

Keywords

ultrasound / derma / radio wave method / skin types

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Irina P. Aksenenko, Marina Yu. Gerasimenko. Evaluation of skin ultrasound diagnostics criteria as a prognostic factor for prevention of adverse events after monopolar radio wave exposure. Russian Journal of Physiotherapy, Balneology and Rehabilitation, 2019, 18(3): 140-144 DOI:10.17816/1681-3456-2019-18-3-140-144

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

Nerobeyev AI, Malakhovskaya VI, Alikova AV. Minimum invasive radiofrequency (RF) lifting application possibilities for face and neck soft tissues’ involutional changes correction. Vestnik esteticheskoj mediciny. 2013;(1):44–50.

[2]

Неробеев А.И., Малаховская В.И., Аликова А.В. Возможности применения минимально инвазивного радиочастотного лифтинга в коррекции инволюционных изменений мягких тканей лица и шеи. Вестник эстетической медицины. 2013;1:44–50.

[3]

Abraham MT, Ross EV. Current concepts in nonabla-tive radiofrequency rejuvenation of the lower face and neck. Facial Plast Surg 2005;21:65–73. doi: 10.1055/s-2005-871765.

[4]

Abraham M.T., Ross E.V. Current concepts in nonablative radiofrequency rejuvenation of the lower face and neck. Facial Plast Surg. 2005;21:65–73. doi: 10.1055/s-2005-871765.

[5]

Finzi E, Spangler A. Multipass vector (mpave) technique with nonablative radiofrequency to treat facial and neck laxity. Dermatol Surg. 2005;31:916–922. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4725.2005.31805.

[6]

Finzi E., Spangler A. Multipass vector (mpave) technique with nonablative radiofrequency to treat facial and neck laxity. Dermatol Surg. 2005;31:916–922. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4725.2005.31805.

[7]

Weiss RA, Weiss MA, Munavalli G, et al. Monopolar radiofrequency facial tightening: a retrospective analysis of efficacy and safety in over 600 treatments. J Drugs Dermatol. 2006;5:707–12.

[8]

Weiss R.A., Weiss M.A., Munavalli G., et al. Monopolar radiofrequency facial tightening: a retrospective analysis of efficacy and safety in over 600 treatments. J Drugs Dermatol. 2006;5:707–12.

[9]

Fritz M, Counters JT, Zelickson BD. Radiofrequency treatment for middle and lower face laxity. Arch Facial Plast Surg. 2004;6:370–3.

[10]

Fritz M., Counters J.T., Zelickson B.D. Radiofrequency treatment for middle and lower face laxity. Arch Facial Plast Surg. 2004;6:370–3.

[11]

De Felipe I, Del Cueto SR, Perez E, et al. Adverse reactions after non-ablative radiofrequency: follow-up of 290 patients. J Cosmet Dermatol. 2007;6:163–6. doi: 10.1111/j.1473-2165.2007.00322.x.

[12]

De Felipe I., Del Cueto S.R., Perez E., et al. Adverse reactions after non-ablative radiofrequency: follow-up of 290 patients. J Cosmet Dermatol. 2007;6:163–6. doi: 10.1111/j.1473-2165.2007.00322.x.

[13]

De Felipe I, Redondo P. Animal model to explain fat atrophy using nonablative radiofrequency. Dermatol Surg. 2007;33:141–5. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4725.2006.33031.x.

[14]

De Felipe I., Redondo P. Animal model to explain fat atrophy using nonablative radiofrequency. Dermatol Surg. 2007;33:141–5. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4725.2006.33031.x.

[15]

Petrova GA, Gorskaya AA, Petrova KS, et al. Radiofrequency lifting effectiveness morphofunctional estimation. Vestnik esteticheskoj mediciny. 2011;4:80–84.

[16]

Петрова Г.А., Горская А.А., Петрова К.С. и др. Морфофункциональная оценка эффективности радиочасттного лифтинга. Вестник эстетической медицины. 2011;4:80–84.

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

Eco-Vector

AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF

68

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

AI思维导图

/