Ophthalmopatology as a cause of primary disability in the adults of Krasnoyarsk region: A 15-year (2007–2021) overview

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Understanding the dynamics and regional features of primary disability formation is crucial for developing organizational and managerial measures to improve the provision of medical care and the system of rehabilitation measures to reduce the level of disability in the population.

OBJECTIVE: The study aimed to assess the state and dynamics of primary disability due to ophthalmopathology in the adult population of the Krasnoyarsk Region from 2007 to 2021.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data sources include forms № 7-SOBES (Information on the medical and social examination of persons aged 18 years and older), statistical collections of the Federal State Budgetary Institution Medical and Social Expertise of the Ministry of Labor of Russia, and reporting documents of the Main Bureau of Medical and Social Expertise in Krasnoyarsk territory from 2007 to 2021. The comparative characteristics of the analyzed data were carried out for three periods: 2007–2011, 2012–2016, and 2017–2021.

RESULTS: For 2007–2021, 5,708 people were recognized as disabled for the first time due to the pathology of the eye. The dynamics of primary disability was characterized by unevenness. The values of the intensive indicator of primary disability ranged from 1.7 to 2.6 (mean 1.9) per 10,000 population aged 18 and above. Among those initially recognized as disabled, individuals at retirement age prevailed with an increased instance of 8.5% every subsequent five years. People with disabilities were mainly residents of the cities in the region. Compared with 2007–2011 and 2012–2016 in the last 5 years, the share of IDPs in groups I and II increased (27.1% [524/1,930] and 43.4% [837/1930]), while the proportion people with disabilities of group III decreased (29.5% [569/1930]). The leading cause of disability was glaucoma (32.0% [606/1,891], 30.1% [569/1,887], and 31.1% [599/1,930] in groups I, II, and III, respectively). Second place in the list is occupied by age-related macular degeneration (15.7% [298/1,891], 20.3% [383/1,887], and 27% [522/1,930] in groups I, II, and III, respectively), and the third is myopia (14.1% [268/1,891], 11.2% [211/1,887], and 11.9% [231/1,930] in groups I, II, and III, respectively).

CONCLUSION: The dynamics of primary disability due to eye pathology in the adult population of the Krasnoyarsk Territory in 2007–2021 are variable, partly associated with an increase in the number of people with disabilities of retirement age. There was an increase in disability groups during 2017–2021. Therefore, improving the efficiency of preventive medicine and providing the region with medical personnel can help reduce the level of primary disability in the region.

Keywords

disability / adult population / working age / retirement age / eye diseases

References

[1] Vydrov AS, Komarovskikh EN. The analysis of structure and dynamics of disability in the Amur region owing to eye diseases. Kuban Scientific Medical Bulletin. 2014;1(143):64–66. (In Russ).

[2] Выдров А.С., Комаровских Е.Н. Анализ структуры и динамики инвалидности в Амурской области вследствие глазных заболеваний // Кубанский научный медицинский вестник. 2014. № 1 (143). С. 64–66.

[3] Agaеva RB. Dynamics of indicators of disability causеd by eye diseases in assessment of efficiency of periodic health examination of the population of Azerbaijan. Kazan medical journal. 2017;98(3):376–381. (In Russ). doi: 10.17750/KMJ2017-376

[4] Агаева Р.Б. Динамика показателей инвалидности вследствие болезней глаза в оценке эффективности диспансеризации населения Азербайджана // Казанский медицинский журнал. 2017. Т. 98, № 3. С. 376–381. doi: 10.17750/KMJ2017-376

[5] Khodzhaev NS, Tonaeva KhD, Stroyko MS. Assessment of the structure and dynamics of primary disability of the adult population due to eye diseases and its adnexa in the Russian Federation for the period 2016–2019. Current problems of health care and medical statistics. 2022;(1):552–562. (In Russ). doi: 10.24412/2312-2935-2022-1-552-562

[6] Ходжаев Н.С., Тонаева Х.Д., Стройко М.С. Оценка структуры и динамики первичной инвалидности взрослого населения вследствие болезней глаза и его придаточного аппарата в Российской Федерации за период 2016–2019 гг. // Современные проблемы здраво- охранения и медицинской статистики. 2022. № 1. С. 552–562. doi: 10.24412/2312-2935-2022-1-552-562

[7] Alikova TT, Alikova ZR, Mamsurova IC. Disability analysis of adult population because of eye diseases in the North Ossetia-Alania Republic. Sovremennye problemy nauki i obrazovanija. 2016;(5):74. Available from: https://science-education.ru/ru/article/view?id=25240. Accessed: 22.09.2022. (In Russ).

[8] Аликова Т.Т., Аликова З.Р., Мамсурова И.Ч. Анализ инвалидности взрослого населения республики Северная Осетия-Алания по причине глазных болезней // Современные проблемы науки и образования. 2016. № 5. Режим доступа: https://science-education.ru/ru/article/view?id=25240. Дата обращения: 22.09.2022.

[9] Puzin SN, Nazaryan MG, Arbukhanova PM, Vertash OYu. Analysis of primary disability due to eye diseases in Moscow in dynamics for 10 years (2007–2016 years). Medical and Social Expert Evaluation and Rehabilitation. 2018;21(3–4):149–151. (In Russ). doi: 10.18821/1560-9537-2018-21-3-149-151

[10] Пузин C.Н., Назарян М.Г., Арбуханова П.М., Верташ О.Ю. Анализ первичной инвалидности вследствие болезней глаза в Москве в динамике за 10 лет (2007–2016 гг.) // Медико-социальная экспертиза и реабилитация. 2018. Т. 21, № 3–4. С. 149–151. doi: 10.18821/1560-9537-201821-3-149-151

[11] Apostolova AS, Malyshev AV, Bashko АА, et al. Features of Primary Ocular Disability in the Krasnodar Region in 2016–2018. Ophthalmology in Russia. 2021;18(4):955–961. (In Russ). doi: 10.18008/1816-5095-2021-4-955-961

[12] Апостолова А.С., Малышев А.В., Башко А.А., и др. Особенности первичной глазной инвалидности в Краснодарском крае в 2016–2018 годах // Офтальмология. 2021. Т. 18, № 4. С. 955–961. doi: 10.18008/1816-5095-2021-4-955-961

[13] Nazarian MG, Dzagurova ZR. Comparative analysis of primary disability due to eye diseases in the Russian Federation, the Central federal region and its subjects. Medical and Social Expert Evaluation and Rehabilitation. 2015;18(4):25–28. (In Russ). doi: 10.17816/MSER35869

[14] Назарян М.Г., Дзагурова З.Р. Сравнительный анализ первичной инвалидности вследствие болезней глаза в Российской Федерации, Центральном федеральном округе и его субъектах // Медико-социальная экспертиза и реабилитация. 2015. Т. 18, № 4. С. 25–28. doi: 10.17816/MSER35869

[15] Terekhovich MV, Kazachkova LE, Kozina EV, et al. Indicators of primary disability due to eye diseases of adult population in the Krasnoyarsk area. Medical and Social Expert Evaluation and Rehabilitation. 2011;(1):30–33. (In Russ). doi: 10.17816/MSER35566

[16] Терехович М.В., Казачкова Л.Е., Козина Е.В., и др. Показатели первичной инвалидности вследствие патологии органов зрения взрослого населения Красноярского края // Медико-социальная экспертиза и реабилитация. 2011. Т. 14, № 1. С. 30–33. doi: 10.17816/MSER35566

[17] Apostolova AS. Features of primary disability due to eye diseases in the Krasnodar region during six years. Ophthalmology Journal. 2013;6(2):16–19. (In Russ). doi: 10.17816/OV2013216-19

[18] Апостолова А.С. Особенности первичной инвалидности вследствие болезней органа зрения в Краснодарском крае в динамике за 6 лет // Офтальмологические ведомости. 2013. Т. 6, № 2. С. 16–19. doi: 10.17816/OV2013216-19

[19] Kondrikova N, Simchina Ya, Bratchikova V. Analysis of errors when referring patients to sociomedical examination. Vrach. 2016;(7):2–5. (In Russ).

[20] Кондрикова Н., Симчина Я., Братчикова В. Анализ ошибок при направлении пациентов на медико-социальную экспертизу // Врач. 2016. № 7. С. 2–5.

[21] Makogon SI, Makogon AS. Primary and recurrent glaucoma-induced disability in senior workingage population in the Altai territory. Russian ophthalmological journal. 2017;10(3):42–48. (In Russ). doi: 10.21516/20720076-2017-10-3-42-48

[22] Макогон С.И., Макогон А.С. Особенности первичной и повторной инвалидности вследствие глаукомы у лиц старше трудоспособного возраста в Алтайском крае // Российский офтальмологический журнал. 2017. Т. 10, № 3. С. 42–48. doi: 10.21516/2072-0076-2017-10-3-42-48

[23] Krasyuk EY, Semenov AN, Noskova OG, Kanaev AA. Prevalence and disability because of glaucoma in Tambov province. Tambov University Reports. Series: Natural and Technical Sciences. 2017;22(6):1513–1521. (In Russ). doi: 10.20310/1810-0198-2017-22-6-1513-1521

[24] Красюк Е.Ю., Семёнов А.Н., Носкова О.Г., Канаев А.А. Распространённость и инвалидность вследствие глаукомы в Тамбовской области // Вестник Тамбовского университета. Серия «Естественные и технические науки». 2017. Т. 22, № 6. С. 1513–1521. doi: 10.20310/1810-0198-2017-22-6-1513-1521

[25] Bikbov MM, Babushkin AE, Khusnitdinov II, et al. Dynamics of epidemiological indicators of glaucoma in the Republic of Bashkortostan for the period of 2010–2016. RMJ. Clinical ophthalmology. 2018;(4):163–167. (In Russ). doi: 10.21689/2311-7729-2018-18-4-163-167

[26] Бикбов М.М., Бабушкин А.Э., Хуснитдинов И.И., Мурова Л.Х., и др. Динамика эпидемиологических показателей глаукомы в Республике Башкортостан за период 2010–2016 гг. // РМЖ. Клиническая офтальмология. 2018. № 4. С. 163–167. doi: 10.21689/2311-7729-2018-18-4-163-167

[27] Puzin SN, Nazarian MG, Schekaturov АА, Vertash ОY. Medico-social characteristic of disability due to kontengent eye diseases given nosological forms in Moscow. Medical and Social Expert Evaluation and Rehabilitation. 2018;21(3–4):134–137. (in Russ). doi: 10.18821/1560-9537-2018-21-3-134-137

[28] Пузин С.Н., Назарян М.Г., Щекатуров А.А., Верташ О.Ю. Медико-социальная характеристика контингента инвалидов вследствие болезней глаза с учётом нозологической формы в г. Москве // Медико-социальная экспертиза и реабилитация. 2018. Т. 21, № 3–4. С. 134–137. doi: 10.18821/1560-9537-2018-21-3-134-137

[29] Antsiferov MB, Demidov NA, Kalashnikova MF, et al. The dynamics of the main epidemiological indicators among living in Moscow patients with diabetes mellitus (2013–2018). Diabetes mellitus. 2020;23(2):113–124. (In Russ.) doi: 10.14341/DM11374

[30] Анциферов М.Б., Демидов Н.А., Калашникова М.Ф., и др. Динамика основных эпидемиологических показателей у пациентов с сахарным диабетом, проживающих в Москве (2013–2018) // Сахарный диабет. 2020. № 2. С. 113–124. doi: 10.14341/DM11374

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

Eco-Vector