Impact of anti-inflammatory therapy on the effects of photodynamic exposure in an experiment
T A Karmakova , M S Vorontsova , Yu B Venediktova , R I Yakubovskaya , T A Karmakova , M S Vorontsova , Yu B Venediktova , R I Yakubovskaya
Russian Journal of Oncology ›› 2011, Vol. 16 ›› Issue (1) : 20 -26.
Impact of anti-inflammatory therapy on the effects of photodynamic exposure in an experiment
A model of transplantable mouse sarcoma S-37 was used to show that the administration of anti-inflammatory drugs (ketonal and contrical) in therapeutic doses after photodynamic therapy (PDT) not only reduces the magnitude of photo-induced local tissue reactions, but may potentiate, in certain regimens, the therapeutic effect against the growth of primary tumor and metastases. The most signifiсant anti-tumor effect of PDT was observed when ketonal and contrical were coadministered twice 1 and 5 hours after light exposure. The study of the microvascular bed in the tumor growth area, by using immunohistochemistry with antibodies to the vascular endothelium (anti-CD31), has indicated that neovascularization processes are inhibited at the site of exposure when ketonal and contrical are given in the above regimen after PDT. The anti-inflammatory drug-potentiated antitumor effect of PDT is presumed to be caused by the inhibition of mediators of the exudative photo-induced nonspecific inflammation phase followed by delayed microvascular regenerative proliferation and prolonged injured tissue ischemia.
photodynamic therapy / photosens / anti-inflammatory therapy / ketonal / contrical
| [1] |
Abels C. // Photochem. Photobiol. Sci. - 2004. - Vol. 3. - P. 765-771. |
| [2] |
Babilas P., Landthaler M., Szeimies R. M. // Eur. J. Dermatol. - 2006. - Vol. 16, N 4. - P. 340-348. |
| [3] |
Canti G., De Simone A., Korbelik M. // Photochem. Photobiol. Sci. - 2002. - Vol. 1. - P. 79-80. |
| [4] |
van Duijnhoven F. H., Aalbers R. I. J. M., Rovers J. P. et al. // Immunobiol. - 2003. - Vol. 207. - P. 105-113. |
| [5] |
Ferrario A., von Tiehl K. F., Rucker N. et al. // Cancer Res. - 2000. - Vol. 60, N 15. - P. 4066-4069. |
| [6] |
Ferrario A., Von Tiehl K., Wong S. et al. // Cancer Res. - 2002. - Vol. 62, N 14. - P. 3956-3961. |
| [7] |
Ferrario A., Fisher A. M., Rucker N., Gomer C. J. // Cancer Res. - 2005. - Vol. 65, N 20. - P. 9473-9478. |
| [8] |
Fingar V. H. // J. Clin. Laser Med. Surg. - 1996. - Vol. 14. - P. 323-328. |
| [9] |
Gillitzer R., Goebeler M. // J. Leukocyte Biol. - 2001. - Vol. 69. - P. 513-521. |
| [10] |
Gollnick S. O., Evans S. S., Baumann H. et al. // Br. J. Cancer. - 2003. - Vol. 42. - P. 1772-1779. |
| [11] |
Gomer C. J., Ferrario A., Luna M. et al. // Lasers Surg. Med. - 2006. - Vol. 38, N 5. - P. 516-521. |
| [12] |
Huang Z. // Technol. Cancer Res. Treat. - 2005. - Vol. 4, N 3. - P. 283-293. |
| [13] |
Korbelik M. // Lasers Surg. Med. - 2006. - Vol. 38, N 5. - P. 500-508. |
| [14] |
Mitton D., Ackroyd R. // Photodiagn. Photodyn. Ther. - 2008. - Vol. 5, N 2. - P. 103-111. |
| [15] |
Nowis D., Makowski M., Stoklosa T. et al. // Acta Biochim. Pol. - 2005. - Vol. 52, N 2. - P. 339-352. |
| [16] |
Nowis D., Stoklosa T., Legat M. et al. // Photodiagn. Photodyn. Ther. - 2005. - Vol. 2. - P. 283-298. |
Eco-Vector
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |