Issledovanie diagnosticheskoy chuvstvitel'nosti novykh opukholeassotsiirovannykh koprologicheskikh markerov pri kolorektal'nom rake

N S Sergeeva , V I Chissov , G I Vorob'ev , Yu A Shelygin , N V Marshutina , N K Parilova , S V Chernyshov , M P Solokhina , E V Zenkina , N V Bogdanova , L A Vashakmadze , V M Khomyakov , D V Sidorov , L M Kogoniya

Russian Journal of Oncology ›› 2010, Vol. 15 ›› Issue (2) : 21 -24.

PDF
Russian Journal of Oncology ›› 2010, Vol. 15 ›› Issue (2) : 21 -24. DOI: 10.17816/onco39705
Articles
other

Issledovanie diagnosticheskoy chuvstvitel'nosti novykh opukholeassotsiirovannykh koprologicheskikh markerov pri kolorektal'nom rake

Author information +
History +
PDF

Abstract

The authors studied the sensitivity and specificity of 3 new tests detecting human hemoglobin (hHb), the hemoglobin-haptoglobin (hHb/Hp) complex, and tumor pyruvate kinase (fTu M2-PK) in feces to diagnose colorectal cancer (CRC). The investigation included patients with CRC (n = 78), ulcerative colitis (UC) (n = 21), enteric polyps (n = 12), and apparently healthy donors (n = 47). The sensitivity of the hHb test system was highest (88.5%) in diagnosing CRC while the hHB/Hp and fTu M2-PK tests were slightly lower (76.9 and 77.9%, respectively). These tests revealed UC with a slightly lower sensitivity in the same order: 76.2, 57.1, and 66.7%, respectively. The feces from the patients with enteric polyps were marker positive in some cases. In donors, the specificity of the hHb and hHb/Hp tests was high (93.6 and 100%, respectively) and that of the fTu M2-PK test system was slightly lower (81.1%).

Keywords

hHb / hHb/Hp / fTu M2-PK / colorectal cancer / coprotests / hHb / hHb/Hp / fTu M2-PK

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
N S Sergeeva, V I Chissov, G I Vorob'ev, Yu A Shelygin, N V Marshutina, N K Parilova, S V Chernyshov, M P Solokhina, E V Zenkina, N V Bogdanova, L A Vashakmadze, V M Khomyakov, D V Sidorov, L M Kogoniya. Issledovanie diagnosticheskoy chuvstvitel'nosti novykh opukholeassotsiirovannykh koprologicheskikh markerov pri kolorektal'nom rake. Russian Journal of Oncology, 2010, 15(2): 21-24 DOI:10.17816/onco39705

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

Земляной В. П., Трофимова Т. Н., Непомнящая С. Л., Дементьева Т. В. // Практ. онкол. - 2005. - Т. 6, № 2. - С. 71-80.

[2]

Состояние онкологической помощи населению России в 2007 г. // Под ред. В. И. Чиссова и др. - М., 2008.

[3]

Hardt P. D.,Ngoumou B., Rupp B. et al. // Anticancer Res. - 2003. - Vol. 23. - P. 851-854.

[4]

Hoepffner N., Shastri Y. M., Hanisch E. et al. // Aliment. Pharmacol. - 2006. - Vol. 23. - P. 145-154.

[5]

Hugo F., Fischer G., Eigenbrodt E. // Anticancer Res. - 1999. - Vol. 19. - P. 2753-2758.

[6]

Sato H., Sasazuki T., Tsunoo H., Nakajima H. // Proc. Japan Acad. - 1973. - Vol. 49, N 7. - P. 549-554.

[7]

Schirrmacher S. et al. // Congress of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine. - 2003.08-10.10, Aachen. - P 4.54.

[8]

Sieg A., Thoms C., Lüthgens K. et al. // Int. J. Colorectal Dis. - 1999. - Vol. 14. - P. 267-271.

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

Eco-Vector

AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF

43

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

AI思维导图

/