Preparation of the Abstracts for Publication in the Proceedings of the Conferences

References

[1] Быков В.Л. Реферат научной статьи - ненужное приложение или ценный источник информации? Морфология, 2003, вып. 1, с. 7-8.

[2] Alexandrov A.V. and Hennerici M.G. Writing good abstracts. Cerebrovasc. Dis., 2007, v. 23, № 4, p. 256-259.

[3] Autorino R., Quarto G., Di Lorenzo G. et al. What happens to the abstracts presented at the SocieM Internationale d'Urologie meeting? Urology, 2008, v. 71, № 3, p. 367-371.

[4] Barnes D.M. Still struggling to define scientific misconduct. J. NIH Res., 1992, v. 4, № 1, p. 10.

[5] Broad W.J. The publishing game: getting more for less. Science, 1981, v. 211, p. 1137-1139.

[6] Callaham M.L., Wears R.L., Weber E.J. et al. Positive-outcome bias and other limitations in the outcome of research abstracts submitted to a scientific meeting. JAMA, 1998, v. 280, № 3, p. 254-257.

[7] Dahllof G., Wondimu B. and Maniere M.C. Subsequent publication of abstracts presented at the International Association of Paediatric Dentistry meetings. Int. J. Paediatr. Dent., 2008, v.18, № 2, p. 91-97.

[8] Dickersin K. and Min YI. Publication bias: the problem that won't go away. Ann. N.Y Acad. Sci., 1993, v. 703, p. 135-146.

[9] Doherty M. The misconduct of redundant publication. Ann. Rheum. Dis., 1996, v. 55, p. 783-785.

[10] Easterbrook P.J., Berlin J.A., Gopalan R. and Matthews D.R. Publication bias in clinical research. Lancet, 1991, v. 337, p. 867-872.

[11] Kelly J.A. Scientific meeting abstracts: significance, access, and trends. Bull. Med. Libr. Assoc., 1998, v. 86, № 1, p. 68-76.

[12] Larian B., Namazie A., Agha N. et al. Publication rate of abstracts presented at the annual meeting of the American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery. Otolaryngol. Head Neck Surg., 2001, v. 125, p. 166-169.

[13] Pierson D.J. How to write an abstract that will be accepted for presentation at a national meeting. Respir. Care, 2004 (а), v. 49, № 10, p. 1206 -1212.

[14] Pierson D.J. The top 10 reasons why manuscripts are not accepted for publication. Respir. Care, 2004 (б), v. 49, № 10, p. 1246 -1252.

[15] Poolman R.W., Keijser L.C., de Waal Malefijt M.C. et al. Reviewer agreement in scoring 419 abstracts for scientific orthopedics meetings. Acta Orthop., 2007, v. 78, № 2, p. 278-284.

[16] Riordan F.A.I. Do presenters to paediatric meetings get their work published? Arch. Dis. Child, 2000, v. 83, p. 524-526.

[17] Rosmarakis E.S., Soteriades E.S., Vergidis P.I. et al. From conference abstract to full paper: differences between data presented in conferences and journals. FASEB J., 2005, v. 19, p. 673-680.

[18] Ross J.S., Gross C.P., Desai M.M. et al. Effect of blinded peer review on abstract acceptance. JAMA, 2006, v. 295, № 14, p.1675-1680.

[19] Sanossian N., Ohanian A.G., Saver J.L. et al. Frequency and determinants of nonpublication of research in the stroke literature. Stroke, 2006, v. 37, p. 2588-2592.

[20] Scherer R.W., Dickersin K. and Langenberg P. Full publication of results initially presented in abstracts. A meta-analysis. JAMA, 1994, v. 272, № 2, p. 158-162.

[21] Susser M. and Yankauer A. Prior, duplicate, repetitive, fragmented, and redundant publication and editorial decisions. Am. J. Public Health, 1993, v. 83, № 6 , p. 792-793.

[22] Taboulet P. Advice on writing an abstract for a scientific meeting and on the evaluation of abstracts by selection committees. Eur J. Emerg. Med., 2000, v. 7, № 1, p. 67-72.

[23] von Elm E., Costanza M.C., Walder B. and Tramer M.R. More insight into the fate of biomedical meeting abstracts: a systematic review. BMC Med Res. Methodol., 2003; v. 3, № 1, p. 12-22.

[24] Weber E.J., Callaham M.L., Wears R.L. et al. Unpublished research from a medical specialty meeting. Why investigators fail to publish. JAMA, 1998, v. 280, p. 257-259.

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

Eco-Vector