Efficacy and Safety of Two-Level Brachial Plexus Block at Locking Intramedullary Shoulder Osteosynthesis

V. B Dubinenkov; P. A Lyuboshevskiy; S. V Larionov; N. A Koryshkov; E. V Shushpanova

doi:10.17816/vto201623378-80

N.N. Priorov Journal of Traumatology and Orthopedics ›› 2016, Vol. 23 ›› Issue (3) : 78 -80. DOI: 10.17816/vto201623378-80

Short communications

brief-report

Efficacy and Safety of Two-Level Brachial Plexus Block at Locking Intramedullary Shoulder Osteosynthesis

Author information +

History +

PDF

Abstract

Results of the comparative study of the efficacy and safety of one- and two-level brachial plexus block (BPB) at locking intramedullary shoulder osteosynthesis are presented. Fifty five patients (mean age 43.4±3.2 years) with humeral diaphysis fracture were operated on. In the main group of patients (n=28) two-level BPB was performed: interscalene block was combined with supraclavicular brachial plexus block and superficial brachial plexus block (SBPB). In control group (n=27) one-level interscalene and superficial BPB and SBPB were performed. Severity of pain syndrome was assessed by visual analog scale. It was shown that two-level BPB ensured better anesthetic, postoperative analgesic effect and higher percent of successful regional anesthesias as well as decreased the requirement in narcotic analgesics on the first postoperative day. The number of complications did not differ significantly between the groups.

Keywords

two-level brachial plexus block / successful regional anesthesia / locking intramedullary osteosynthesis / humeral diaphysis fracture

Cite this article

Download citation ▾

V. B Dubinenkov, P. A Lyuboshevskiy, S. V Larionov, N. A Koryshkov, E. V Shushpanova. Efficacy and Safety of Two-Level Brachial Plexus Block at Locking Intramedullary Shoulder Osteosynthesis. N.N. Priorov Journal of Traumatology and Orthopedics, 2016, 23(3): 78-80 DOI:10.17816/vto201623378-80

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户忘记密码

References

Publishing order | Descend order by publishing year | Descend order by cited within

[1]	Попов В.Ю. Варианты проводниковой анестезии плечевого сплетения у травматологических больных: Автореф. дис. … канд. мед. наук. Новосибирск; 1999.

[2]	Al-Kaisy A., McGuire G., Chan V.W., Bruin G., Peng P., Miciaci A. Analgetic effect of interscalene block using low - dose bupivacaine for outpatient artroscopic shoulder surgery. Reg. Anesth. Pain Med. 1998; 23 (5): 469-73.

[3]	Franco C.D., Vieira Z.E. 1,001 subclavian perivascular brachial plexus blocks: success with a nerve stimulator. Reg. Anesth. Pain Med. 2000; 25 (1): 41-6.

[4]	Lanz E., Theiss D., Jankovic D. The extent of blockade following various techniques of brachial plexus block. Anesth. Analg. 1983; 62: 55-8.

[5]	Neal J.M., Bernards C.M., Butterworth J.F. IV, Di Gregorio G., Drasner K., Hejtmanek M.R. et al. ASRA practice advisory on local anesthetic systemic toxicity. Reg. Anesth. Pain Med. 2010; 35 (2): 152-61.

[6]	Neal J.M., Bernards C.M., Hadzic A., Hebl J.R., Hogan Q.H., Horlocker T.T. et al. ASRA practice advisory on neurologic complications in regional anesthesia and pain medicine. Reg. Anesth. Pain Med. 2008; 33 (5): 404-15.

[7]	Рафмелл Д.Р., Нил Д.М., Вискоуми К.М. Регионарная анестезия. Самое необходимое в анестезиологии. М.: МЕДпресс-информ; 2007.

[8]	Мигачев С.Л., Свиридов С.В. Осложнения блокады плечевого сплетения. Регионарная анестезия и лечение боли. Тематический сборник. Москва - Тверь; 2004: 100-8.

[9]	Морган Дж.Э., Михаил М.С. Клиническая анестезиология. М.: Бином; 1998: 253-357.

[10]	Mazoit J.X. Daleus B.J. Ropivacain in infants and children. Curr. Opin. Anaesthesiol. 2003; 16 (3): 305-7.

[11]	Brown D.L., Cahill D.R., Bridenbaugh L.D. Supraclavicular nerve block: anatomic analysis of a method to prevent pneumothorax. Anesth. Analg. 1993; 76: 530-4.