Role of Cytological Examination in Diagnosis and Monitoring of Large Joints Peri-Implant Inflammation

V. P Voloshin; Eremin V AV; V. S Zubkov; S. N Shatokhina; D. V Martynenko; N. M Zakharova; S. A Oshkukov

doi:10.17816/vto20130158-62

N.N. Priorov Journal of Traumatology and Orthopedics ›› 2013, Vol. 20 ›› Issue (1) : 58 -62. DOI: 10.17816/vto20130158-62

Articles

research-article

Role of Cytological Examination in Diagnosis and Monitoring of Large Joints Peri-Implant Inflammation

Author information +

History +

PDF

Abstract

Cytologic specimens from pathologic foci of 20 patients aged 20— 80 years with acute, chronic and low-grade inflammation in the area of large joint implants were examined. Three variants of cystograms were differentiated: reactive state in response to foreign body, chronic proliferative inflammation and chronic inflammation with bone tissue resorption. Tactics foe surgical treatment of peri-implant inflammation was chosen according to the variant of cytologic picture. Inflammation process was arrested in all patients. Cytologic method can be recommended as a component of complex examination for patients with forthcoming large joints revision arthroplasty as well as measure to prognosticate the inflammation relapse after sanitation procedures

Keywords

joint arthroplasty / peri-implant inflammation of large joints / cytologic examination

Cite this article

Download citation ▾

V. P Voloshin, Eremin V AV, V. S Zubkov, S. N Shatokhina, D. V Martynenko, N. M Zakharova, S. A Oshkukov. Role of Cytological Examination in Diagnosis and Monitoring of Large Joints Peri-Implant Inflammation. N.N. Priorov Journal of Traumatology and Orthopedics, 2013, 20(1): 58-62 DOI:10.17816/vto20130158-62

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户忘记密码

References

Publishing order | Descend order by publishing year | Descend order by cited within

[1]	Hanssen A.D., Spangehl M.J. Treatment of the infected hip replacement. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 2004; (420): 63-71.

[2]	Powers K.A., Terpenning M.S., Voice R.A., Kauffman C.A. Prosthetic joint infections in the elderly. Am. J. Med. 1990; BB (5): 9-13.

[3]	Saccante M. Periprosthetic joint infections: a review for clinicians. Infect. Dis. Clin. Pract. 199B; 7: 431-41.

[4]

Волошин В.П., Еремин A.B., Оноприенко Г.А., Савицкая К.И. Хирургическое лечение хронического гнойного поражения тазобедренного и коленного суставов после тотального эндопротезирования. В кн.: Всероссийский монотематический сборник научных статей «Эндопротезирование России». Выпуск IV. Казань — СПб.; 200B: 201-31.

[5]	Маловичко В.В., Уразгильдеев З.И., Цыкунов М.Б. Опорный неоартроз как альтернатива реэндопротезированию и артродезу при гнойных процессах в области тазобедренного сустава. Вестник травматологии и ортопедии им. H.H. Приорова. 2003; 2: 48-56.

[6]	Уразгильдеев З.И., Маловичко В.В., Цыкунов М.Б. Лечебно-реабилитационные мероприятия при нагноениях после эндопротезирования тазобедренного сустава. В кн.: Сборник тезисов всероссийской научно-практической конференции «Современные технологии в травматологии и ортопедии». М.; 2005: 359-60.

[7]	Durbhakula S.M., Czajka J., Fuchs M.D., Uhl R.L. Spacer endoprosthesis for the treatment of infected total hip artroplasty. J. Artroplasty. 2004; 19 (6): 760-7.

[8]	Tattevin P., Cremieux A.C., Pottier P., Huten D., Carbon C. Prosthetic joint infection: when can prosthesis salvage be considered? Clin. Infect. Dis. 1999; 29 (2): 292-5.

[9]	Banit D.M., Kaufer H., Hartford J.M. Intraoperative frozen section analysis in revision total joint arthroplasty. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 2002; 230: 8.

[10]	Саркисов Д.С., Перов Ю.Л., ред. Микроскопическая техника: Руководство для врачей. М.: Медицина: 1990; 568.