Potentialities of Percutaneous Technique in Revision Surgery of Forefoot Static Deformities

S. Yu Berezhnoy; A. I Protsenko; V. V Kostyukov

doi:10.17816/vto20120442-46

N.N. Priorov Journal of Traumatology and Orthopedics ›› 2012, Vol. 19 ›› Issue (4) : 42 -46. DOI: 10.17816/vto20120442-46

Articles

research-article

Potentialities of Percutaneous Technique in Revision Surgery of Forefoot Static Deformities

Author information +

History +

PDF

Abstract

Results of the analysis of repeated surgical interventions (34 patients, 43 feet) after previously performed surgeries for forefoot static deformities are presented. In all cases various percutaneous techniques were used. Mean follow up was 6 months (3 months — 4 years). Surgical results were assessed using patient satisfaction criterion. Satisfaction with treatment results was recorded in 95% ofpatients. It was shown that potentialities ofpercutaneous technique enabled to solve the majority offorefoot static deformityrevision surgery problems. The conclusion was made that strict order of patient management after reconstructive foot operations enabled to perform early reoperations before severe complications development.

Keywords

foot / percutaneous operations / deformity / exostosis / metatarsalgia

Cite this article

Download citation ▾

S. Yu Berezhnoy, A. I Protsenko, V. V Kostyukov. Potentialities of Percutaneous Technique in Revision Surgery of Forefoot Static Deformities. N.N. Priorov Journal of Traumatology and Orthopedics, 2012, 19(4): 42-46 DOI:10.17816/vto20120442-46

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户忘记密码

References

Publishing order | Descend order by publishing year | Descend order by cited within

[1]	Pinney S., Song K., Chou L. Surgical treatment of mild hallux valgus deformity: the state of practice among academic foot and ankle surgeons. Foot Ankle Int. 2006; 27 (11): 970-3.

[2]	Pinney S.J., Song K.R., Chou L.B. Surgical treatment of severe hallux valgus: the state of practice among academic foot and ankle surgeons. Foot Ankle Int. 2006; 27 (12): 1024-29.

[3]	De Prado M., Ripoll P.L., Golano P. Cirugia percutanea del pie. Masson, 2003: 183-92.

[4]	Kitaoka H.B., Alexander I.J., Adelaar R.S., Nunley J.A., Myerson M.S., Sanders M. Clinical rating systems for ankle-hindfoot, midfoot, hallux and lesser toes. Foot Ankle. 1994;15 (7): 349-53.

[5]	Karasick D., Wapner K. Hallux valgus deformity: preoperative radiologic assessment. AJR. 1990; 155 (1):119—23.

[6]	Besse J.l. Comparative study between Weil osteotomy and distal metatarsal mini-invasive osteotomy. Int. Orthop. 2009; 31 (4): 1079-82.

[7]	Darcel V., Chauveux D., Villet L., Laffenetre O. Treatment of static metatarsalgias by distal percutaneous osteotomies: a prospective study of 222 feet. J. Bone Jt Surg. Br. 2008; 62 (7): 212-16.

[8]	Bauer T.D., Biaua A., Lortat-Jacoba and Hardy P. Distal metatarsal mini-invasive osteotomy for the treatment of metatarsalgias: a prospective study of 98 feet. Orthopaedics and Traumatology: Surgery and Research. 2010; 96 (4): 407-16.

[9]	Бережной С.Ю. Двойная чрескожная остеотомия основной фаланги как способ устранения грубых вальгусных деформаций первого пальца стопы. «Стационарозамещающие технологии: Амбулаторная хирургия». 2011; 3: 26-28.

[10]	Menz H.B., Gilheany M.F., Landorf K.B. Foot and ankle surgery in Australia: a descriptive analysis of the Medicare Benefits Schedule database 1997-2006. J. Foot Ankle Res. 2008; 1 (1): 10-12.

[11]	Polastri М. Postoperative Rehabilitation after Hallux Valgus Surgery: A literature review. The Foot and Ankle Online Journal. 2011; 4 (6).

[12]	Saro C., Bengtsson A.S., Lindgren U, Adami J., Blomqvist P. Surgical treatment of hallux valgus and forefoot deformities in Sweden: a population-based study. Foot Ankle Int. 2008; 29 (3): 298-304.