Idiopathic scolioosis: long-term results of treatment of patients with the method of transpedicular fixation. Retrospective longitudinal study

Yusif L. Zeynalov , Aleksander V. Burtsev

N.N. Priorov Journal of Traumatology and Orthopedics ›› 2022, Vol. 29 ›› Issue (2) : 117 -128.

PDF (1541KB)
N.N. Priorov Journal of Traumatology and Orthopedics ›› 2022, Vol. 29 ›› Issue (2) : 117 -128. DOI: 10.17816/vto110815
Original study articles
research-article

Idiopathic scolioosis: long-term results of treatment of patients with the method of transpedicular fixation. Retrospective longitudinal study

Author information +
History +
PDF (1541KB)

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Тhe study of the treatment results of patients with idiopathic scoliosis should include both objective assessment methods, such as radiography and multispiral computed tomography, and subjective methods related to the response of the patient or his/her parents to treatment. A set of indicators will only allow an objective assessment of the long-term treatment outcomes.

AIM: To examine long-term treatment results of posterior transpedicular fixation in patients with idiopathic scoliosis of varying severity.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: Long-term treatment results by posterior transpedicular fixation were studied in 300 patients with idiopathic scoliosis of varying severity. To assess the effectiveness of treatment, clinical and radiological diagnostic methods and SRS30 and SRS22 questionnaires were used.

RESULTS: Treatment results in 1 year were studied in all patients and in 2 years in 225 patients (75%). In 150 patients (50%), the long-term treatment results was studied in 5, and in 15 of them (10%) in 10–12 years. The achieved correction value was maintained with a slight loss depending on the magnitude of the initial deformity and correction achieved after the operation. The SRS22 questionnaire 2 years after treatment of grade II deformity (according to Chaklin) showed that the indicators of postoperative function and remained practically unchanged, and the scores on self-esteem, appearance, and attitude were higher (p <0.05). In grade IV deformity, the scores on the appearance and attitude of others were high without significant differences.

CONCLUSION: Dorsal correction of the spine using transpedicular implants in patients with idiopathic scoliosis allows obtaining good treatment outcomes, which was confirmed by the preservation of correction during dynamic X-ray examination and assessment using the SRS22 questionnaire.

Keywords

idiopathic scoliosis / posterior transpedicular fixation / long-term results

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Yusif L. Zeynalov, Aleksander V. Burtsev. Idiopathic scolioosis: long-term results of treatment of patients with the method of transpedicular fixation. Retrospective longitudinal study. N.N. Priorov Journal of Traumatology and Orthopedics, 2022, 29(2): 117-128 DOI:10.17816/vto110815

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

Vissarionov SV, Nadirov NN, Belyanchikov SM, et al. Surgical treatment of children with idiopathic thoracolumbar scoliosis using transpedicular spinal systems. Pediatr Traumatol Orthop Reconstruct Surg. 2015;3:15–20. doi: 10.17816/PTORS3315-20

[2]

Vissarionov S.V., Nadirov N.N., Belyanchikov S.M., et al. Surgical treatment of children with idiopathic thoracolumbar scoliosis using transpedicular spinal systems // Pediatr Traumatol Orthop Reconstruct Surg. 2015. Vol. 3. P. 15–20. doi: 10.17816/PTORS3315-20

[3]

Mikhailovskii MV, Vasyura AS, Novikov VV, et al. Surgical correction of idiopathic scoliosis in adult young and middle age patients. Khirurgiia pozvonochnika. 2018;15(3):52–60. (In Russ.) doi: http://dx.doi. org/10.14531/ss2018.3.52-60

[4]

Михайловский M.В., Васюра А.С., Новиков В.В., и др. Хирургическая коррекция идиопатического сколиоза у взрослых больных молодого и среднего возраста // Хирургия позвоночника. 2018. Т. 15, № 3. С. 52–60. doi: http://dx.doi. org/10.14531/ss2018.3.52-60

[5]

Asher MA, Min Lai S, Burton DC. Further development and validation of the Scoliosis Research Society (SRS) outcomes instrument. Spine. 2000;25:2381–2386. doi: 10.1097/00007632-200009150-00018

[6]

Asher M.A., Min Lai S., Burton D.C. Further development and validation of the Scoliosis Research Society (SRS) outcomes instrument // Spine. 2000. Vol. 25. P. 2381–2386. doi: 10.1097/00007632-200009150-00018

[7]

Min K, Sdzuy C, Farshad M. Posterior correction of thoracic adolescent idiopathic scoliosis with pedicle screw instrumentation: results of 48 patients with minimal 10-year follow-up. Eur Spine J. 2013;22(2):345–354. doi: 10.1007/s00586-012-2533-3

[8]

Min K., Sdzuy C., Farshad M. Posterior correction of thoracic adolescent idiopathic scoliosis with pedicle screw instrumentation: results of 48 patients with minimal 10-year follow-up // Eur Spine J. 2013. Vol. 22, N 2. P. 345–354. doi: 10.1007/s00586-012-2533-3

[9]

Darnis A, Grobost P, Roussouly P. Very long-term clinical and radiographic outcomes after posterior spinal fusion with pedicular screws for thoracic adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine Deform. 2021;9(2):441–449. doi: 10.1007/s43390-020-00217-y

[10]

Darnis A., Grobost P., Roussouly P. Very long-term clinical and radiographic outcomes after posterior spinal fusion with pedicular screws for thoracic adolescent idiopathic scoliosis // Spine Deform. 2021. Vol. 9, N 2. P. 441–449. doi: 10.1007/s43390-020-00217-y

[11]

Ogilvie JW. What’s Important: Moving Beyond “Idiopathic” in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis. J Bone Joint Surg. 2020;102(3)269–270. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.19.00433

[12]

Ogilvie J.W. What’s Important: Moving Beyond «Idiopathic» in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis // J Bone Joint Surg. 2020. Vol. 102, N 3. P. 269–270. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.19.00433

[13]

Beauchamp EC, Anderson RCE, Vitale MG. Modern Surgical Management of Early Onset and Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis. Neurosurgery. 2019;84(2):291–304. doi: 10.1093/neuros/nyy267

[14]

Beauchamp E.C., Anderson R.C.E., Vitale M.G. Modern Surgical Management of Early Onset and Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis // Neurosurgery. 2019. Vol. 84, N 2. P. 291–304. doi: 10.1093/neuros/nyy267

[15]

Bettany-Saltikov J, Turnbull D, Ng SY, Webb R. Management of Spinal Deformities and Evidence of Treatment Effectiveness. Open Orthop J. 2017;11:1521–1547. doi: 10.2174/1874325001711011521

[16]

Bettany-Saltikov J., Turnbull D., Ng S.Y., Webb R. Management of Spinal Deformities and Evidence of Treatment Effectiveness // Open Orthop J. 2017. N. 11. P. 1521–1547. doi: 10.2174/1874325001711011521

[17]

Nadirov N, Vissarianov SA. Comparative Study of Surgical Correction of Idiopathic Scoliosis With Spinal Transpedicular Metal Structures in Children. Front Pediatr. 2022;10:871117. doi: 10.3389/fped.2022.871117

[18]

Nadirov N., Vissarianov S.A. Comparative Study of Surgical Correction of Idiopathic Scoliosis With Spinal Transpedicular Metal Structures in Children // Front Pediatr. 2022. Vol. 10. P. 871117. doi: 10.3389/fped.2022.871117

[19]

Norkin IA, Likhachev SV, Zaretskov VV, et al. Computer tomography as a component of preoperative planning for metal transitional spine fixation in the correction of scoliotic deformities by hybrid constructs. Vestnik Rentgenologii i Radiologii. 2018;99(3):139–146. (In Russ.). doi: 10.20862/0042-4676-2018-99-3-139-146

[20]

Норкин И.А., Лихачев С.В., Зарецков В.В., и др. Компьютерная томография как составляющая предоперационного планирования металлофиксации переходных отделов позвоночника при коррекции сколиотических деформаций гибридными конструкциями // Вестник рентгенологии и радиологии. 2018. Т. 99, № 3. С. 139–146. doi: 10.20862/0042-4676-2018-99-3-139-146

[21]

Larson AN, Baky F, Ashraf A, et al. Minimum 20-Year Health-Related Quality of Life and Surgical Rates after the Treatment of Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis. Spine Deform. 2019;7(3):417–427. doi: 10.1016/j.jspd.2018.09.003

[22]

Larson A.N., Baky F., Ashraf A., et al. Minimum 20-Year Health-Related Quality of Life and Surgical Rates after the Treatment of Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis // Spine Deform. 2019. Vol. 7, N 3. P. 417–427. doi: 10.1016/j.jspd.2018.09.003

[23]

Chen L, Sun Z, He J, et al. Effectiveness and safety of surgical interventions for treating adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a Bayesian meta-analysis. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2020;21(1):427. doi: 10.1186/s12891-020-03233-1

[24]

Chen L., Sun Z., He J., et al. Effectiveness and safety of surgical interventions for treating adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a Bayesian meta-analysis // BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2020. Vol. 21, N 1. P. 427. doi: 10.1186/s12891-020-03233-1

[25]

Petrenko DE, Mezentsev AA. Comparative analysis of using ventral and posterior correcting spondylodesis in patients with Lenke 1A and 5S idiopathic scoliosis. Khirurgiya Pozvonochnika. 2014;1:36–41. (In Russ). doi: 10.14531/ss2014.1.36-41

[26]

Петренко Д.Е., Мезенцев А.А. Сравнительный анализ применения вентрального и заднего корригирующего спондилодеза у пациентов с идиопатическим сколиозом типа Lenke 1А и 5С // Хирургия позвоночника. 2014. №. 1. С. 36–41. doi: 10.14531/ss2014.1.36-41

[27]

Vissarionov SV, Sobolev AV, Nadirov NN, et al. Comparative analysis of surgical treatment effectiveness in children with idiopathic scoliosis of thoracolumbar and lumbar spine. Fundamentalnye Issledovaniya. 2015;1:21–26. (In Russ.)

[28]

Виссарионов С.В., Соболев А.В., Надиров Н.Н., и др. Сравнительный анализ эффективности хирургического лечения детей с идиопатическим сколиозом грудопоясничной и поясничной локализации // Фундаментальные исследования. 2015. Т. 1. С. 21–26.

[29]

Chan CYW, Chong JS., Lee SY, et al. Parents’/Patients’ Perception of the Informed Consent Process and Surgeons Accountability in Corrective Surgery for Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis: A Prospective Study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2020;45(23):1661–1667. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000003641

[30]

Chan C.Y.W., Chong J.S.L., Lee S.Y., et al. Parents’/Patients’ Perception of the Informed Consent Process and Surgeons Accountability in Corrective Surgery for Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis: A Prospective Study // Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2020. Vol. 45, N 23. P. 1661–1667. doi: 10.1097/BRS

[31]

Kyrölä K, Järvenpää S, Ylinen J, et al. Reliability and validity study of the finnish adaptation of scoliosis research society questionnaire version SRS-30. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2017;42(12):943–949. doi: 10.1097/ BRS.0000000000001938

[32]

Kyrölä K., Järvenpää S., Ylinen J., et al. Reliability and validity study of the finnish adaptation of scoliosis research society questionnaire version SRS-30 // Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2017. Vol. 42, N 12. P. 943–949. doi: 10.1097/ BRS.0000000000001938

[33]

Aksekili MAE, Demir P, Iyigun A, et al. Turkish validity and reliability study of scoliosis research society-30 questionnaire in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis patients. Spine. (Phila Pa 1976). 1976;46(19):E1058–E1064. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000004034

[34]

Aksekili M.A.E., Demir P., Iyigun A., et al. Turkish validity and reliability study of scoliosis research society-30 questionnaire in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis patients // Spine. (Phila Pa 1976). 1976. Vol. 46, N 19. P. E1058–E1064. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000004034

[35]

Chen L, Liu C, Liao S, et al. A Retrospective Study of Factors Associated with Restoration of Thoracic Kyphosis in 43 Patients with Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis with Lenke Type 1 Curvature. Med Sci Monit. 2021;27:e929149. doi: 10.12659/MSM.929149

[36]

Chen L., Liu C., Liao S., et al. A Retrospective Study of Factors Associated with Restoration of Thoracic Kyphosis in 43 Patients with Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis with Lenke Type 1 Curvature // Med Sci Monit. 2021. N. 27. P. e929149. doi: 10.12659/MSM.929149

[37]

Doi T, Inoue H, Arai Y, et al. Reliability and validity of a novel quality of life questionnaire for female patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: Scoliosis Japanese Questionnaire-27: a multicenter, cross-sectional study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2018;19(1):99. doi: 10.1186/s12891-018-2025-7

[38]

Doi T., Inoue H., Arai Y., et al. Reliability and validity of a novel quality of life questionnaire for female patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: Scoliosis Japanese Questionnaire-27: a multicenter, cross-sectional study // BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2018. Vol. 19, N 1. P. 99. doi: 10.1186/s12891-018-2025-7

[39]

Mac-Thiong JM, Remondino R, Joncas J, et al. Long-term follow-up after surgical treatment of adolescent idiopat hic scoliosis using high-density pedicle screw constructs: Is 5-year routine visit required? Eur Spine J. 2019;28(6):1296–1300. doi: 10.1007/s00586-019-05887-5

[40]

Mac-Thiong J.M., Remondino R., Joncas J., et al. Long-term follow-up after surgical treatment of adolescent idiopat hic scoliosis using high-density pedicle screw constructs: Is 5-year routine visit required? // Eur Spine J. 2019. Vol. 28, N 6. P. 1296–1300. doi: 10.1007/s00586-019-05887-5

[41]

Caronni A, Donzelli S, Zaina F, Negrini S. The Italian Spine Youth Quality of Life questionnaire measures health-related quality of life of adolescents with spinal deformities better than the reference standard, the Scoliosis Research Society 22 questionnaire. Clin Rehabil. 2019;33(8):1404–1415. doi: 10.1177/0269215519842246

[42]

Caronni A., Donzelli S., Zaina F., Negrini S. The Italian Spine Youth Quality of Life questionnaire measures health-related quality of life of adolescents with spinal deformities better than the reference standard, the Scoliosis Research Society 22 questionnaire // Clin Rehabil. 2019. Vol. 33, N 8. P. 1404–1415. doi: 10.1177/0269215519842246

[43]

Schlösser TP, Stadhouder A, Schimmel JJ, et al. Reliability and validity of the adapted Dutch version of the revised Scoliosis Research Society 22-item questionnaire. Spine J. 2014;14(8):1663–1672. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2013.09.046

[44]

Schlösser T.P., Stadhouder A., Schimmel J.J., et al. Reliability and validity of the adapted Dutch version of the revised Scoliosis Research Society 22-item questionnaire // Spine J. 2014. Vol. 14, N 8. P. 1663–1672. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2013.09.046

[45]

Théroux J, Stomski N, Innes S, et al. Revisiting the psychometric properties of the Scoliosis Research Society-22 (SRS-22) French version. Scoliosis Spinal Disord. 2017;12:21. doi: 10.1186/s13013-017-0129-8

[46]

Théroux J., Stomski N., Innes S., et al. Revisiting the psychometric properties of the Scoliosis Research Society-22 (SRS-22) French version // Scoliosis Spinal Disord. 2017. N 12. P. 21. doi: 10.1186/s13013-017-0129-8

[47]

Watanabe K, Lenke LG, Bridwell KH, et al. Comparison of radiographic outcomes for the treatment of scoliotic curves greater than 100 degrees: wires versus hooks versus screws. Spine. 2008;33:1084–1092. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31816f5f3a

[48]

Watanabe K., Lenke L.G., Bridwell K.H., et al. Comparison of radiographic outcomes for the treatment of scoliotic curves greater than 100 degrees: wires versus hooks versus screws // Spine. 2008. N 33. P. 1084–1092. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31816f5f3a

[49]

Hwang SW, Samdani AF, Marks M, et al. Five-year clinical and radiographic outcomes using pedicle screw only constructs in the treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Eur Spine J. 2013;22:1292–1299. doi: 10.1007/s00586-012-2625-0

[50]

Hwang S.W., Samdani A.F., Marks M., et al. Five-year clinical and radiographic outcomes using pedicle screw only constructs in the treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis // Eur Spine J. 2013. Vol. 22. P. 1292–1299. doi: 10.1007/s00586-012-2625-0

[51]

Hwang CJ, Baik JM, Cho JH, et al. Posterior Correction of Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis with High-Density Pedicle Screw-Only Constructs: 5 Years of Follow-Up. Yonsei Med J. 2020;61(4):323–330. doi: 10.3349/ymj.2020.61.4.323

[52]

Hwang C.J., Baik J.M., Cho J.H., et al. Posterior Correction of Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis with High-Density Pedicle Screw-Only Constructs: 5 Years of Follow-Up // Yonsei Med J. 2020. Vol. 61, N 4. P. 323–330. doi: 10.3349/ymj.2020.61.4.323

[53]

Mathew SE, Hargiss JB, Milbrandt TA, et al. Vertebral body tethering compared to posterior spinal fusion for skeletally immature adolescent idiopathic scoliosis patients: preliminary results from a matched case-control study. Spine Deform. 2022;10(5):1123–1131. doi: 10.1007/s43390-022-00519-3

[54]

Mathew S.E., Hargiss J.B., Milbrandt T.A., et al. Vertebral body tethering compared to posterior spinal fusion for skeletally immature adolescent idiopathic scoliosis patients: preliminary results from a matched case-control study // Spine Deform. 2022. Vol. 10, N 5. P. 1123–1131. doi: 10.1007/s43390-022-00519-3

[55]

Vissarionov SB, Belyanchikov SM, Kokushin DN, et al. Results of the spine deformity correction with transpedicular spinal systems in children with idiopathic scoliosis. Khirurgiya Pozvonochnika. 2013;(3):30–37. (In Russ.) doi: https://doi.org/10.14531/ss2013.3.30-37

[56]

Виссарионов C.B., Белянчиков С.М., Кокушин Д.Н., и др. Результаты коррекции деформации позвоночника транспедикулярными спинальными системами у детей с идиопатическим сколиозом // Хирургия позвоночиика. 2013. № 3. C. 30–37. doi: https://doi.org/10.14531/ss2013.3.30-37

[57]

Kepler CK, Meredith DS, Green DW, Widmann RF. Long-term outcomes after posterior spine fusion for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Curr Opin Pediatr. 2012;24:68–75. doi: 10.1097/MOP.0b013e32834ec982

[58]

Kepler C.K., Meredith D.S., Green D.W., Widmann R.F. Long-term outcomes after posterior spine fusion for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis // Curr Opin Pediatr. 2012. N 24. P. 68–75. doi: 10.1097/MOP.0b013e32834ec982

[59]

Mikhaylovskiy MV, Gubina EV, Sergunin AYu, Novikov VV. Long-term results of surgical treatment of idiopathic and congenital scoliosis from the standpoint of the patient’s self-assessment. Khirurgiya Pozvonochnika. 2012;(4):19–25. (In Russ). doi: 10.14531/ss2012.4.19-25

[60]

Михайловский М.В., Губина Е.В., Сергунин А.Ю., Новиков В.В. Отдаленные результаты хирургического лечения идиопатического и врожденного сколиоза с позиций самооценки пациента // Хирургия позвоночника. 2012. Т. 4. С. 19–25. doi: 10.14531/ss2012.4.19-25

[61]

Gubin AV, Prudnikova OG, Kamysheva VV, et al. Clinical testing of the Russian version of the SRS-22 questionnaire for adult patients with scoliosis. Khirurgiya Pozvonochnika. 2017;14(2):31–40. (In Russ). doi: 10.14531/ss2017.2.31-40

[62]

Губин А.В., Прудникова О.Г., Камышева В.В., и др. Клиническая апробация русскоязычной версии анкеты SRS-22 для взрослых пациентов со сколиозом // Хирургия позвоночника. 2017. Т. 14, № 2. С. 31–40. doi: 10.14531/ss2017.2.31-40

[63]

Kolesov SV, Pereverzev VS, Panteleev AA, et al. The first experience of ventral dynamic correction of scoliosis in adolescents with completed growth and in adults: surgical technique and immediate results. Khirurgiya Pozvonochnika. 2021;18(3):19–29. (In Russ). doi: 10.14531/ss2021.3.19-29

[64]

Колесов С.В., Переверзев В.С., Пантелеев А.А., и др. Первый опыт вентральной динамической коррекции сколиозов у подростков с законченным ростом и взрослых: хирургическая техника и ближайшие результаты // Хирургия позвоночника. 2021. Т. 18, № 3. С. 19–29. doi: 10.14531/ss2021.3.19-29

[65]

Asher M, Min Lai S, Burton D, Manna B. The reliability and concurrent validity of the scoliosis research society-22 patient questionnaire for idiopathic scoliosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2003;28(1):63–69. doi: 10.1097/00007632-200301010-00015

[66]

Asher M., Min Lai S., Burton D., Manna B. The reliability and concurrent validity of the scoliosis research society-22 patient questionnaire for idiopathic scoliosis // Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2003. Vol. 28, N 1. P. 63–69. doi: 10.1097/00007632-200301010-00015

[67]

Pehlivanoglu T, Oltulu I, Erdag Y, et al. Comparison of clinical and functional outcomes of vertebral body tethering to posterior spinal fusion in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis and evaluation of quality of life: preliminary results. Spine Deform. 2021;9(4):1175–1182. doi: 10.1007/s43390-021-00323-5

[68]

Pehlivanoglu T., Oltulu I., Erdag Y., et al. Comparison of clinical and functional outcomes of vertebral body tethering to posterior spinal fusion in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis and evaluation of quality of life: preliminary results // Spine Deform. 2021. Vol. 9, N 4. P. 1175–1182. doi: 10.1007/s43390-021-00323-5

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

Eco-Vector

AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF (1541KB)

105

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

AI思维导图

/