Treatment of femoral neck fractures at the turn of the century

V. M. Lirtsman , V. I. Zorya , S. F. Gnetetsky

N.N. Priorov Journal of Traumatology and Orthopedics ›› 1997, Vol. 4 ›› Issue (2) : 12 -19.

PDF
N.N. Priorov Journal of Traumatology and Orthopedics ›› 1997, Vol. 4 ›› Issue (2) : 12 -19. DOI: 10.17816/vto106692
Original study articles
research-article

Treatment of femoral neck fractures at the turn of the century

Author information +
History +
PDF

Abstract

On the basis of world literature data review and personal observations the authors conclude that primary osteosynthesis should be performed on the day of patient’s admission in case no special contraindications are present. The application of massive monolithic fixators is not expedient because of their depress the reparative regeneration in fracture zone and damage blood supply of the femoral head. Two fixators are sufficient for stable osteosynthesis: distal fixator is placed with support at Adams arch and/or Markel «spur» and prevents varus deformity of the femoral head and neck; proximal fixator is inserted into cortex of the femoral neck and prevents the backwards displacement. Stabilisation of femoral neck fragments with screws should be performed by their maximum insertion into cortical bone. Unipolar prosthesis of the femoral head or total hip replacement are indicated mainly in failed osteosynthesis.

Keywords

treatment problem / hip fracture

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
V. M. Lirtsman, V. I. Zorya, S. F. Gnetetsky. Treatment of femoral neck fractures at the turn of the century. N.N. Priorov Journal of Traumatology and Orthopedics, 1997, 4(2): 12-19 DOI:10.17816/vto106692

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

Дворецкий Л. //Мед. газета. — 1996. — N 88—89 (5.11). — С. 12—13.

[2]

Шестерня Н.А. Современные методы лечения и анализ исходов внутри- и околосуставных переломов длинных трубчатых костей:Автореф. ... дис. д-ра мед. наук. — М., 1992.

[3]

Baker G., Barrick Е. //J. Bone Jt Surg. — 1978. — Vol. 60A, N 2. — P. 269—271.

[4]

Benterund J. et al. //Arch. Orthop. Trauma Surg. — 1994. — Vol. 113. — P. 97—100.

[5]

Berglund-Roden M. et al. //Acta Orthop. Scand.— 1994. - Vol. 65, N 3. — P. 287—294.

[6]

Deyerle W. //Clin. Orthop. — 1965. — Vol. 152. — P. 49—84.

[7]

Lin C. et al. //SIKOT—96, Final programme. — Amsterdam, 1996. — P. 329.

[8]

Lindequist S. et al. //Acta Orthop. Scand. — 1993. — Vol. 64, N 1. — P. 67—70.

[9]

Smith-Hoffer, Timmerman H. //Clin. Orthop. — 1988.— Vol. 230. — P. 127—140.

[10]

Soreide O. et al. //Acta Orthop. Scand. — 1980. — Vol. 51, N 6. — P. 827—831.

[11]

Stromqvist B. et al. //Ibid. — 1983. — Vol. 54, N 3. — P. 340—347.

[12]

Stromqvist B. et al. //Ibid. — 1992. — Vol. 63, N 3. — P. 282—287.

[13]

Thomgren K. //SIKOT—96, Final programme. — Amsterdam, 1996. — P. 155—156.

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

Eco-Vector

AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF

134

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

AI思维导图

/