Analysis of dynamic endothelial cell density loss after corneal endothelial transplantation

Oganes Georgievich Oganesyan , V V Neroev , R A Gundorova , M A Smetanina , D Yu Danilova , O G Oganesyan , V V Neroyev , R A Gundorova , M A Smetanina , D Yu Danilova

Russian Medicine ›› 2011, Vol. 17 ›› Issue (4) : 32 -36.

PDF
Russian Medicine ›› 2011, Vol. 17 ›› Issue (4) : 32 -36. DOI: 10.17816/rmj37936
Articles
other

Analysis of dynamic endothelial cell density loss after corneal endothelial transplantation

Author information +
History +
PDF

Abstract

Dynamic endothelial cell loss is an inevitable process that is inherent in the endothelium of the cornea, including transplanted one, and affects late graft survival. The aim of this communication is to analyze endothelial cell density (ECD) loss after endothelial transplantation by modified DSEK and DMEK techniques. The analysis is based on a follow-up of ECD in 163 patients undergoing endothelial keratoplasty by the modified DSEK and DMEK techniques. The follow-up lasted 10-55 months. Endothelial microscopy was performed using an endothelial contactless microscope 1, 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively and then every year. Dynamic EDC loss was calculated using the preoperative donor ECD. The EDC losses were 20.8±12.9, 26.3±12, and 32.3±12.5% within the first 12, 24, and 36 months after DSEK, respectively. The EDC decreases were 8.4±14.8, 20.5±13.4, 25.1±15.3, and 33.2±15.4% within the first month, the first 6, 12, 24 months following DMEK, respectively. The EDC loss after endothelial keratoplasty (DSEK and DMEK) was less than that given in the literature, which is conjecturally associated with the native pattern of a graft. This communication is the first in the Russian literature on this topic.

Keywords

DMEK / DSEK / DMEK / DSEK / microinvasive descemetoplasty / endothelial dystrophy / endothelial keratoplasty / endothelial cell density

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Oganes Georgievich Oganesyan, V V Neroev, R A Gundorova, M A Smetanina, D Yu Danilova, O G Oganesyan, V V Neroyev, R A Gundorova, M A Smetanina, D Yu Danilova. Analysis of dynamic endothelial cell density loss after corneal endothelial transplantation. Russian Medicine, 2011, 17(4): 32-36 DOI:10.17816/rmj37936

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

Горгиладзе Т. У., Кочкарева О. И., Соколова Э. Н. // Офтальмол. журн. - 1986. - № 2. - С. 92-96.

[2]

Каспаров А. А., Ермаков Н. В., Раппопорт Ю. М. // Вестн. офтальмол. - 1990. - Т. 106, № 5. - С. 12-17.

[3]

Комах Ю. А. Клинико-цитохимические аспекты прогнозирования и профилактики помутнения трансплантата после рекератопластики: Автореф. дис. ... канд. мед. наук. - М., 1995.

[4]

Сургуладзе Н. Г. Роль эндотелия в приживлении роговичного трансплантата после сквозной кератопластики: Автореф. дис. ... канд. мед. наук. - М., 1990.

[5]

Ченцова Е. В. Система патогенетически обоснованного лечения ожоговой травмы глаз: Дис. ... д-ра мед. наук. - М., 1996.

[6]

Bell K. D., Campbell R. J., Bourne W. M. // Cornea. - 2000. - Vol. 19, N 1. - P. 40-46.

[7]

Borderie V. M., Boélle P. Y., Touzeau O. et al. // Ophthalmology. - 2009. - Vol. 116, N 12. - P. 23.

[8]

Bourne W. M., Hodge D. O., Nelson L. R. // Am. J. Ophthalmol. - 1994. - Vol. 118, N 2. - P. 185-196.

[9]

Bourne W. M. // Cornea. - 2001. - Vol. 20, N 6. - P. 560- 569.

[10]

Chen E. S., Terry M. A., Shamie N. // Cornea. - 2008. - Vol. 27, N 5. - P. 514-520.

[11]

Cornea Donor Study Investigator Group and Specular Microscopy Ancillary Study // Ophthalmology. - 2008. - Vol. 115, N 4. - P. 627-632.

[12]

Culbertson W. W., Bbbott R. L., Forster R. K. // Ophthalmology. - 1982. - Vol. 89, N 6. - P. 600-604.

[13]

Ham L., Dapena I., van Luijk C. et al. // Eye. - 2009. - Vol. 23, N 10. - P. 1990-1998.

[14]

Ing J. J., Ing H. H., Nelson L. R. et al. // Ophthalmology. - 1998. - Vol. 105, N 10. - P. 1855-1865.

[15]

Inoue K., Amono S., Oshika T. et al. // Jpn. J. Ophthalmol. - 2000. - Vol. 44, N 2. - P. 139-145.

[16]

Koenig S. B., Covert D. J. // Ophthalmology. - 2007. - Vol. 114, N 2. - P. 221-226.

[17]

Miraine M., Cauchez C., Watt Z. et al. // Graefe's Arch. Clin. Exp. Ophthalmol. - 2003. - Vol. 241, N 7. - P. 571-576.

[18]

Melles G., Ong S., Ververs B., van der Wees J. // Am. J. Ophthalmol. - 2008. - Vol. 145, N 2. - P. 222-227.

[19]

Olsen T., Ehlers N., Favini E. // Acta Ophthalmol. Scand. - 1984. - Vol. 62, N 3. - P. 445-452.

[20]

Patel N. P., Kim T., Rapuano C. J., Cohen E. J. // Ophthalmology. - 2000. - Vol. 107, N 4. - P. 719-724.

[21]

Patel S. V., Hodge D. O., Bourne W. M. // Trans. Am. Ophthalmol. Soc. - 2004. - Vol. 102, N 6. - P. 57-66.

[22]

Price F. // J. Cataract Refract. Surg. - 2009. - Vol. 35, N 10. - P. 1659-1664.

[23]

Price F., McCauley J. P., Price M. // VI World Cornea Congress, 2010 april, Boston USA. - Abstr. online.

[24]

Tappin M. // Eye. - 2007. - Vol. 21, N 6. - P. 775-779.

[25]

Terry M. A., Chen E. S., Shamie N. // Ophthalmology. - 2008. - Vol. 115, N 3. - P. 488-496.

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

Eco-Vector

AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF

63

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

AI思维导图

/