Electromyographic analysis of motor units in patients with post-stroke hemiparesis

E. I. Bogdanov , R. R. Faskhutdinov , D. L. Galyamov

Kazan medical journal ›› 1989, Vol. 70 ›› Issue (1) : 24 -26.

PDF
Kazan medical journal ›› 1989, Vol. 70 ›› Issue (1) : 24 -26. DOI: 10.17816/kazmj99742
Articles
research-article

Electromyographic analysis of motor units in patients with post-stroke hemiparesis

Author information +
History +
PDF

Abstract

Among the mechanisms of motor disorders in central motor neuron lesions, along with changes in descending impulses to motoneurons, segmental disorders are also assumed. In 1879, Charcot proposed the hypothesis of transsynaptic degeneration of motoneurons in lesions of central motor neurons. Subsequently, changes in motoneurons in experimental and clinical lesions of the pyramidal tract were observed by many, though not all researchers. Charcot's theory received as if a new confirmation in electromyographic studies, which showed a decrease in the number of motor units and increase in the territories of the preserved motor units in the muscles of the affected side in patients with hemiplegia.

Keywords

Kazan Medical archive

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
E. I. Bogdanov, R. R. Faskhutdinov, D. L. Galyamov. Electromyographic analysis of motor units in patients with post-stroke hemiparesis. Kazan medical journal, 1989, 70(1): 24-26 DOI:10.17816/kazmj99742

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

Гехт Б. М., Касаткина Л. Ф., Кевиш А. В.// Невропатол. и психиатр.— 1980.— № 6.— С. 822—829.

[2]

Barron D. Н.//Рrос. Soc. Exp. Biol.— 1933.— Vol. 30.— P. 1327—1329.

[3]

Boter M., Carp N.//Acta Neurol. Psychiatr. Hellenica.— 1966.— Vol. 5.— P. 66—79.

[4]

Charcot J. M.//Lectures on disease of the nerwous system.— Philodelphia, 1879.

[5]

Chokroverty S., Reyes M., Rubino F. A et al.//Arch. Neurol.— 1976.— Vol. 33.— P. 104—110.

[6]

Cook W. H., Walker J. H., Barr M. L.//J. Comp. Neurol.— 1951.— Vol. 94.— P. 267—292.

[7]

Cruz Martinez A., Del Campo F., Mugo P. et al.//J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatr.— 1982.— Vol. 45.— P. 756—757.

[8]

Dahllöf A. G., Bööj S., Larsson P. et al.//Scand. J. Rehabil. Med.— 1983.— Bd. 27—39.

[9]

Edström L.//J. Neurol. Sci.— 1970.— Vol. 11.— P. 537—550.

[10]

Freund H. J., Dietz V., Wita C. W. et al.//New Dev. Electromyogr. Clin. Neurophysiol./Ed. J. Desmedt.— Basel, 1973.— Vol. 3.— P. 242— 250.

[11]

Guth L., Smith S., Donati E. J. et al.// Exp. Neurol.— 1980.— Vol. 67.— P. 513—523.

[12]

Hilton-Brown P., Stalberg E., Trontelj J. et a/.//Muscle Nerve.— 1985.— Vol. 8.— P. 383—388.

[13]

McComas A. J., Sica R. E. P., Unton A. R. M. et al.//Nature.— 1971.— Vol. 233.— P. 21—23.

[14]

Ribchester R. P.//J. Physiol.— 1983.— Vol. 3.— P. 89—111.

[15]

Scelsi R., Lotta S., Lommi G.//Acta Neuropathol. (Berl.) — 1984.— Bd. 324—331.

[16]

Segura R., Sahgal V. et al.//Muscle Nerve.— 1981.— Vol. 4.— P. 246—248.

[17]

Spaans F., Wilts G.//J. Neurol. Sci.— 1982.— Vol. 57.— P. 291—305.

[18]

Woolf A. L.//In.: Disorders of Voluntery muscle.— Ed. J. W. Walton,— London, 1969.

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

Eco-Vector

AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF

110

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

AI思维导图

/