Diagnosis and treatment of acute bowel obstruction

A M Khadjibaev; N A Khadjimukhamedova; F A Khadjibaev

doi:10.17816/KMJ2188

Kazan medical journal ›› 2013, Vol. 94 ›› Issue (3) : 377 -381. DOI: 10.17816/KMJ2188

Healthcare mangement

research-article

Diagnosis and treatment of acute bowel obstruction

Author information +

History +

PDF

Abstract

Aim. To improve treatment outcomes in patients with acute bowel obstruction. Methods. 1479 patients with bowel obstruction (75.7% - small bowel obstruction, 24.3% - large bowel obstruction) were examined. Patients were treated according to the local treatment protocol, 1003 (68%) patients underwent surgery. Results. The following procedures were performed at the stage of bowel obstruction diagnosis and treatment: conventional adhesiolysis was performed in 425 cases, laparoscopic adhesiolysis - in 425 cases, small bowel resection with further anastomosis - in 151 cases, small bowel resection with ileostomy - in 15 cases, phytobezoar fragmenting - in 56 cases, enterotomy and phytobezoar removal - in 2 cases. In patients with large bowel obstruction the following procedures were performed: large bowel segmental resection with further anastomosis - in 38 cases, large bowel segmental resection with colostomy - in 38 cases, large bowel partial resection with colostomy - in 54 cases, right hemicolectomy with primary anastomosis - in 43 cases, left hemicolectomy with primary anastomosis - in 58 cases, manual intussusception reduction - in 65 cases, side anastomosis - in 31 cases. In 69 cases of bowel obstruction primary anastomosis was performed using the metal ring frame. Conclusion. To reduce the rate of complications, the need for the surgery should be diagnosed as soon as possible, coagulopathies should be compensated, and surgery tactics should be defined, including the primary anastomosis formation.

Keywords

bowel obstruction / prognostic criteria / primary anastomosis

Cite this article

Download citation ▾

A M Khadjibaev, N A Khadjimukhamedova, F A Khadjibaev. Diagnosis and treatment of acute bowel obstruction. Kazan medical journal, 2013, 94(3): 377-381 DOI:10.17816/KMJ2188

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户忘记密码

References

Publishing order | Descend order by publishing year | Descend order by cited within

[1]	Алтиев Б.К., Атаджанов Ш.К., Исабаев Ш.Б. Проблемы диагностики и лечения острой спаечной тонкокишечной непроходимости // Вестн. экстрен. мед. - 2010. - №1. - С. 88-92.

[2]	Ермолов А.С., Рудин Э.П., Оюн Д.Д. Выбор метода хирургического лечения обтурационной непроходимости при опухолях ободочной кишки // Хирургия. - 2004. - №2. - С. 4-7.

[3]	Топузов Э.Г., Плотников В.П., Абдуллаев М.А. Рак ободочной кишки, осложнённый кишечной непроходимостью: диагностика, лечение, реабилитация. - СПб.: Медицина, 1997. - С. 154.

[4]	Хаджибаев А.М., Байбеков И.М., Ходжимухамедова Н.А., Хаджибаев Ф.А. Особенности взаимодействия тканевых структур с металлическим кольцом и шовным материалом в условиях эксперимента // Пробл. клин. мед. - 2007. - №3. - С. 64-67.

[5]	Хаджибаев А.М., Байбеков И.М., Ходжимухамедова Н.А., Хаджибаев Ф.А. Наложение кишечных анастомозов с применением каркасного металлического кольца в эксперименте // Биол. ж. Узбекистана. - 2009. - №1. - С. 17-21.

[6]	Хаджибаев А.М., Ходжимухамедова Н.А., Хаджибаев Ф.А. Экспериментальное обоснование применения каркасного кольца при межкишечных анастомозах // Вестн. экстрен. мед. - 2010. - №1. - С. 20-24.

[7]	Khadjibaev A.M., Khodjimukhamedova N.A., Yangiev R.A., Khadjibaev F.A. The diagnostics and treatment of small and large intestines’ injuries at the abdominal traumas // Med. Health Sci. J. - 2012. - Vol. 11. - P. 61-66.

[8]

Khodjimukhamedova N., Khadjibaev F., Shukurov B. Clinical experience of frame ring utilization in applying interintestinal anastomoses in urgent surgery // Indian J. Surg. - 2012. - Vol. 74, N 4. - ISSN: 0972-2068 (Print) 0973-9793 (Online). - http://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007%2Fs12262-012-0629-y.pdf (дата обращения: 20.04.2013).