Peculiarities of antibiotic resistance of Staphylococcus aureus strains isolated from nosocomial infections

S A Atakishizade

Kazan medical journal ›› 2020, Vol. 101 ›› Issue (3) : 325 -329.

PDF (392KB)
Kazan medical journal ›› 2020, Vol. 101 ›› Issue (3) : 325 -329. DOI: 10.17816/KMJ2020-325
Theoretical and clinical medicine
research-article

Peculiarities of antibiotic resistance of Staphylococcus aureus strains isolated from nosocomial infections

Author information +
History +
PDF (392KB)

Abstract

Aim. To study of the antibiotic resistance of S. aureus strains isolated from nosocomial infections (pneumonia, surgical site infections and sepsis) in a multidisciplinary surgical clinic.

Methods. Microbiological testing of sputum in 41 patients with pneumonia, of samples (wound, abscess, drainage) obtained from 40 patients with surgical site infections (SSI) and of blood from 46 patients with signs of sepsis was performed. The obtaining cultures were identified by conventional methods (including morphological, cultural, biochemical features, etc.). Disc diffusion method was used to detect methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) strains. Inducible clindamycin resistance (ICR) of S. aureus strains was determined by double disk approximation test (D-test).

Results. Methicillin-resistant S. aureus was found in 14.3% (2 of 14) of the patients with surgical site infections, in the sputum 27.3% (3 of 11) of the patients with pneumonia, and in the blood 50.0% (7 of 14) of the patients with sepsis (p >0.05). The rate of inducible clindamycin resistance of isolated S. aureus strains in patients with surgical site infections (2 of 14 cases, 14.3%) and with pneumonia (2 of 11 cases, 18.2%) did not statistically significant difference with the rate of methicillin resistance (p >0.05). However the rate was significantly lower septic infections — 7.1% and 50.0% respectively (p=0.0328).

Conclusion. Among S. aureus strains isolated from nosocomial infections, the rate of methicillin-resistant S. aureus had not depended on the type of nosocomial infection; the rate of inducible clindamycin resistance in septic infections was lower than resistance to methicillin.

Keywords

nosocomial infections / Staphylococcus aureus / methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) / inducible clindamycin resistance (ICR)

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
S A Atakishizade. Peculiarities of antibiotic resistance of Staphylococcus aureus strains isolated from nosocomial infections. Kazan medical journal, 2020, 101(3): 325-329 DOI:10.17816/KMJ2020-325

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

Kang J., Sickbert-Bennett E.E., Brown V.M. et al. Relative frequency of health care-associated pathogens by infection site at a university hospital from 1980 to 2008. Am. J. Infect. Control. 2012; 40 (5): 416–420. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajic.2011.06.013.

[2]

Li J., Yu L., Yang J. et al. Species distribution of pathogens and prognostic factors for catheter-related bloodstream infections in intensive care unit. Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2015; 95 (9): 659–662. PMID: 25976045.

[3]

Shahane V., Bhawal S., Lele U. Surgical site infections: A one year prospective study in a tertiary care center. Int. J. Health Sci. 2012; 6 (1): 79–84. DOI: 10.12816/0005976.

[4]

Gould I.M., Reilly J., Bunyan D., Walker A. Costs of healthcare-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and its control. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 2010; 16 (12): 1721–1728. DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2010.03365.x.

[5]

Priya Datta, Neelam Gulati, Nidhi Singla et al. Eva­luation of various methods for the detection of meticillin-­resistant Staphylococcus aureus strains and susceptibility patterns. J. Med. Microbiol. 2011; 60: 1613–1616. DOI: 10.1099/jmm.0.032219-0.

[6]

Prabhu K., Rao S., Rao V. Inducible clindamycin resistance in Staphylococcus aureus isolated fromclinical samples. J. Lab. Phys. 2011; 3 (1): 25–27. DOI: 10.4103/0974-­2727.78558.

[7]

Lewis J.S., Jorgensen J.H. Inducible clindamycin resistance in staphylococci: Should clinicians and microbio­logists be concerned? Oxford J. M. Health Clin. Infect. Dis. 2006; 40 (2): 280–285. DOI: 10.1086/426894.

[8]

Gubler E.V. Vychislitel'nye metody analiza i raspoznavaniya patologicheskikh protsessov. (Computational methods for the analysis and reco­gnition of pathological processes.) Leningrad: Meditsina. 1978; 296 р. (In Russ.)

[9]

Гублер Е.В. Вычислительные методы анализа и распознавания патологических процессов. Ленинград: Медицина. 1978; 296 с.

[10]

Si D., Rajmokan M., Lakhan P. et al. Surgical site infections following coronary artery bypass graft procedures: 10 years of surveillance data. BMC Infect. Dis. 2014; 14: 318. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2334-14-318.

[11]

Takesue Y., Watanabe A., Hanaki H. et al. Nationwide surveillance of antimicrobial susceptibility patterns of pathogens isolated from surgical site infections (SSI) in Japan. J. Infect. Chemother. 2012; 18 (6): 816–826. DOI: 10.1007/s10156-012-0509-1.

[12]

De Kraker M.E., Jarlier V., Monen J.C. et al. The changing epidemiology of bacteraemias in Europe: trends from the European Antimicrobial Resistance Surveillance System. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 2013; 19 (9): 860–868. DOI: 10.1111/1469-0691.12028.

[13]

Kavitha Prabhu, Sunil Rao, Venkatakrishna Rao. Inducible clindamycin resistance in Staphylococcus aureus isolated from clinical samples. J. Lab. Physicians. 2011; 3 (1): 25–27. DOI: 10.4103/0974-2727.78558.

[14]

Patel M., Waites K.B., Moser S.A. Prevalence of inducible clindamycin resistance among ­community and hospital-associated Staphylococcus aureus isolates. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2006; 44 (7): 2481–2484. DOI: 10.1128/JCM.02582-05.

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

Atakishizade S.A.

AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF (392KB)

134

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

AI思维导图

/