Towards evidence based research

Hans Lund; Klara Brunnhuber; Carsten Juhl; Karen Robinson; Marlies Leenaar; Bertil F Dorch; Gro Jamtvedt; Monica W Nortvedt; Robin Christensen; Iain Chalmers

doi:10.17816/KMJ2019-733

Kazan medical journal ›› 2019, Vol. 100 ›› Issue (5) : 733 -739. DOI: 10.17816/KMJ2019-733

Articles

editorial

Towards evidence based research

Author information +

History +

PDF

Abstract

Cite this article

Download citation ▾

Hans Lund, Klara Brunnhuber, Carsten Juhl, Karen Robinson, Marlies Leenaar, Bertil F Dorch, Gro Jamtvedt, Monica W Nortvedt, Robin Christensen, Iain Chalmers. Towards evidence based research. Kazan medical journal, 2019, 100(5): 733-739 DOI:10.17816/KMJ2019-733

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户忘记密码

References

Publishing order | Descend order by publishing year | Descend order by cited within

[1]	Young C., Horton R. Putting clinical trials into context. Lancet. 2005; 366: 107–108. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)66846-8. PMID: 16005318.

[2]	Chalmers I. Academia’s failure to support systematic reviews. Lancet. 2005; 365: 469. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)70260-9. PMID: 15705448.

[3]	Robinson K.A., Goodman S.N. A systematic examination of the citation of prior research in reports of randomized, controlled trials. Ann. Intern. Med. 2011; 154: 50–55. DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-154-1-201101040-00007. PMID: 21200038.

[4]	Clarke M., Chalmers I. Discussion sections in reports of controlled trials published in general medical journals: islands in search of continents? JAMA. 1998; 280: 280–282. DOI: 10.1001/jama.280.3.280. PMID: 9676682.

[5]	Clarke M., Alderson P., Chalmers I. Discussion sections in reports of controlled trials published in general medical journals. JAMA. 2002; 287: 2799–2801. DOI: 10.1001/jama.28721.2799. PMID: 12038916.

[6]	Cooper N.J., Jones D.R., Sutton A.J. The use of systematic reviews when designing studies. Clin. Trials. 2005; 2: 260–264. DOI: 10.1191/1740774505cn090oa. PMID: 16279149.

[7]	Fergusson D., Glass K.C., Hutton B., Shapiro S. Randomized controlled trials of aprotinin in cardiac surgery: could clinical equipoise have stopped the bleeding? Clin. Trials. 2005; 2: 218–229, discussion 229-32. DOI: 10.1191/1740774505cn085oa. PMID: 16279145.

[8]	Clarke M., Hopewell S., Chalmers I. Clinical trials should begin and end with systematic reviews of relevant evidence: 12 years and waiting. Lancet. 2010; 376: 20–21. DOI: 10.1016/ S0140-6736(10)61045-8. PMID: 20609983.

[9]	Sheth U., Simunovic N., Tornetta P 3rd et al. Poor citation of prior evidence in hipfracturetrials. J. Bone. Joint Surg. Am. 2011; 93: 2079–2086. DOI: 10.2106/JBJS. J.01274. PMID: 22262379.

[10]	Habre C., Tramer M.R., Popping D.M., Elia N. Ability of a meta-analysis to prevent redundant research: systematic review of studies on pain from propofol injection. BMJ. 2014; 348: g5219. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.g5219. PMID: 25161280.

[11]	Sawin V.I., Robinson K.A. Biased and inadequate citation of prior research in reports of cardiovasculartrials is a continuing source ofwaste in research. J. Clin. Epidemiol. 2016; 69: 174–178. PMID: 26086727.

[12]	Clarke M., Hopewell S., Chalmers I. Reports of clinical trials should begin and end with up-to-date systematic reviews of other relevant evidence: a status report. J. R. Soc. Med. 2007; 100: 187–190. DOI: 10.1258/jrsm.100.4.187. PMID: 17404342.

[13]	Greenberg S.A. How citation distortions create unfounded authority: analysis ofacitation network. BMJ. 2009; 339: b2680. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.b2680. PMID:19622839.

[14]	Bastiaansen J.A., de Vries Y.A., Munafo M.R. Citation distortions in the literature on the serotonin-transporter-linked polymorphic region and amygdala activation. Biol. Psychiatry. 2015; 78: e35–36. DOI: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2014.12.007. PMID: 25866295.

[15]	Thornley C., Watkinson A., Nicholas D. et al. The role of trust and authority in the citation behaviour of researchers. Information Research. 2015; 20: 677.

[16]

Perino A.C., Hoang D.D., Holmes T.H. et al. Association between success rate and citation count of studies of radiofrequency catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation: possible evidence of citation bias. Circ. Cardiovasc. Qual. Outcomes. 2014; 7: 687–692. DOI: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.114.000912. PMID: 25205786.

[17]	Jannot A.S., Agoritsas T., Gayet-Ageron A., Perneger T.V. Citation bias favoring statistically significant studies was present in medical research. J. Clin. Epidemiol. 2013; 66: 296–301. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2012.09.015. PMID: 23347853.

[18]	Fiorentino F., Vasilakis C., Treasure T. Clinical reports of pulmonary metastasectomy for colorectal cancer: a citation network analysis. Br. J. Cancer. 2011; 104: 1085–1097. DOI: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6606060. PMID: 21386844.

[19]	Robinson K.A. Use of prior research in the justification and interpretation of clinical trials. Johns Hopkins University, 2009.

[20]	National Institute for Health Research. Guidance notes for applicants: outline applications. NIHR, 2016.

[21]	Chalmers I. The lethal consequences of failing to make full use of all relevant evidence about the effects of medical treatments: the importance of systematic reviews. In: Rothwell P.M. ed. Treating individuals — from randomised trials to personalised medicine. Lancet. 2007; 37–58.

[22]	Lund H., Juhl C., Christensen R. Systematic reviews and research waste. Lancet. 2016; 387: 123–124. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)01354-9. PMID: 26841992.

[23]	Mahtani K.R. All health researchers should begin their training by preparing at least one systematic review. J. R. Soc. Med. 2016; 109: 264–268. DOI: 10.1177/0141076816643954. PMID: 27118697.

[24]	Kleinert S., Benham L., Collingridge D. et al. Further emphasis on research in context. Lancet. 2014; 384: 2176–2177. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)62047-X. PMID: 25625383.

[25]	Jefferson T., Deeks J. The use of systematic reviews for editorial peer reviewing: a population approach. In: Godlee F., Jefferson T. eds. Peer review in health sciences. BMJ Books. 1999: 224–234.

[26]	Bastian H., Glasziou P., Chalmers I. Seventy-five trials and eleven systematic reviews a day: how will we ever keep up? PLoS Med. 2010; 7: e1000326. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000326. PMID: 20877712.

[27]	Dickersin K., Rennie D. Registering clinical trials. JAMA. 2003; 290: 516–523. DOI: 10.1001/jama.290.4.516. PMID: 12876095.

[28]	Chalmers I., Glasziou P. Systematic reviews and research waste. Lancet. 2016; 387: 122–123. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)01353-7. PMID: 26841991.

[29]	Macleod M.R., Michie S., Roberts I. et al. Biomedical research: increasing value, reducing waste. Lancet. 2014; 383: 101–104. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)62329-6. PMID: 24411643.

[30]	Ioannidis J.P., Greenland S., Hlatky M.A. et al. Increasing value and reducing waste in research design, conduct, and analysis. Lancet. 2014; 383: 166–175. DOI: 10.1016/S0140- 6736(13)62227-8. PMID: 24411645.

[31]	Glasziou P., Altman D.G., Bossuyt P. et al. Reducing waste from incomplete or unusable reports of biomedical research. Lancet. 2014; 383: 267–276. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13) 62228-X. PMID: 24411647.

[32]	Chan A.W., Song F., Vickers A. et al. Increasing value and reducing waste: addressing inaccessible research. Lancet. 2014; 383: 257–266. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)62296-5. PMID: 24411650.

[33]	Al-Shahi Salman R., Beller E., Kagan J. et al. Increasing value and reducing waste in biomedical research regulation and management. Lancet. 2014; 383: 176–185. DOI: 10.1016/ S0140-6736(13)62297-7. PMID: 24411646.

[34]	Chalmers I., Glasziou P. Avoidable waste in the production and reporting of research evidence. Lancet. 2009; 374: 86–89. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)60329-9. PMID: 19525005.

[35]	Starr M., Chalmers I., Clarke M., Oxman A.D. The origins, evolution, and future of The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. Int. J. Technol. Assess Health Care. 2009; 25 (Suppl. 1): 182–195. DOI: 10.1017/S026646230909062X. PMID: 19534840.

[36]	Elliott J.H., Turner T., Clavisi O. et al. Living systematic reviews: an emerging opportunity to narrow the evidence-practice gap. PLoS Med. 2014; 11: e1001603. DOI: 10.1371/journal. pmed.1001603. PMID: 24558353.

[37]	Vandvik P.O., Brignardello-Petersen R., Guyatt G.H. Living cumulative network meta-analysis to reduce waste in research: A paradigmatic shift for systematic reviews? BMC Med. 2016; 14: 59. DOI: 10.1186/s12916-016-0596-4. PMID: 27025849.

[38]	Clarke M., Brice A., Chalmers I. Accumulating research: a systematic account of how cumulative meta-analyses would have provided knowledge, improved health, reduced harm and saved resources. PLoS One. 2014; 9: e102670. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone. 0102670. PMID: 25068257.

[39]	Siebert U., Rochau U., Claxton K. When is enough evidence enough? — Using systematic decision analysis and value-of-information analysis to determine the need for further evidence. Z. Evid. Fortbild. Qual. Gesundhwes 2013; 107: 575–584. DOI: 10.1016/j.zefq.2013.10.020. PMID: 24315327.

[40]	Garner P., Hopewell S., Chandler J. et al. Panel for updating guidance for systematic reviews (PUGs). When and how to update systematic reviews: consensus and checklist. BMJ. 2016; 354: i3507. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.i3507. PMID: 27443385.

[41]	Wetterslev J., Thorlund K., Brok J., Gluud C. Trial sequential analysis may establish when firm evidence is reached in cumulative meta-analysis. J. Clin. Epidemiol. 2008; 61: 64–75. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2007.03.013. PMID: 18083463.

[42]	Booth A., Clarke M., Dooley G. et al. The nuts and bolts of PROSPERO: an international prospective register of systematic reviews. Syst. Rev. 2012; 1: 2. DOI: 10.1186/2046-4053-1-2. PMID: 22587842.