Application of adaptive tools in relaparotomy wound surgery

Abstract

Aim. To evaluate the clinical effectiveness of the developed adaptive tools for mechanical treatment of wound surface and suturing of relaparotomy wounds.

Methods. 55 patients aged 43 to 79 years after relaparotomy operated on for various acute surgical diseases of the abdominal cavity were treated. In the main group (n=22. average age 63.5±4.75 years) in uncomplicated and complicated course of the wound process after relaparotomy for treatment of the wound surface and wound closure, adaptive tools were used as proposed by the authors. In the comparison group (n=33, average age 62±6 years; p=0.98) traditional mechanical methods of wound defect sanation and wound suturing (simple nodal, 8-shaped and U-shaped sutures) were used. Monitoring of relaparotomy wound healing was performed using an ultrasound method. The analysis of postoperative local complications in the discussed groups of patients was carried out according to Clavien-Dindo classification.

Results. In patients of the main group, the multiplicity of wound surface treatment decreased by 1.8 times compared to the comparison group. There were no cases of damage to the underlying tissues of the wound edges. Wound postoperative complications corresponded to severity grade I, II, and IIIa according to Clavien-Dindo classification: in the main group - 27.3% and in the comparison group - 54.5%. Suppuration occurred respectively in 9.1 and 33.3% of patients (p=0.049).

Conclusion. The developed adaptive tools are safe and effective mechanical means of prevention of wound postoperative complications after relaparotomy.

Keywords

relaparotomy / adaptive tools / wound contractor / mechanical treatment of wound cavity / suturing of relaparotomy wound / wound postoperative complications

References

[1] Volenko A.V. Prevention of postoperative wound complications. Khirurgiya. 1998; (9): 65–68. (In Russ.)

[2] Воленко А.В. Профилактика послеоперационных осложнений ран. Хирургия. 1998; (9): 65-68.

[3] Izmaylov S.G., Izmaylov G.A., Podushkina I.V. et al. Lechenie ran. (Wound treatment.) Kazan: KGTU. 2003; 292 р. (In Russ.)

[4] Измайлов С.Г., Измайлов Г.А., Подушкина И.В. и др. Лечение ран. Казань: КГТУ. 2003; 292 с.

[5] Malkov I.S. Izbrannye razdely neotlozhnoy abdominalnoy khirurgii. (Elected sections of urgent abdominal surgery.) Kazan: Izd-vo Kazanskogo gosudarstvennogo tekhnicheskogo un-ta. 2013; 434 р. (In Russ.)

[6] Малков И.С. Избранные разделы неотложной абдоминальной хирургии. Казань: Изд-во Казанского гос. техн. ун-та. 2013; 434 с.

[7] Ovchinnikov V.A., Abelevich A.I. Soedinenie tkaney v khirurgii. Rukovodstvo. (Wound closure in surgery. Guide.) Nizhniy Novgorod: Izd-vo NizhGMA. 2014; 152 р. (In Russ.)

[8] Овчинников В.А., Абелевич А.И. Соединение тканей в хирургии. Руководство. Нижний Новгород: Изд-во НижГМА. 2014; 152 с.

[9] Bensman V.M., Savchenko Yu.P., Shcherba S.N. et al. Methods of laparotomy wound closure in diffuse peritonitis. Khirurgiya. 2016; (7): 30–35. (In Russ.)

[10] Бенсман В.М., Савченко Ю.П., Щерба С.Н. и др. Способы закрытия лапаротомной раны при распространённом перитоните. Хирургия. 2016; (7): 30-35. DOI: 10.17116/hirurgia2016730-35.

[11] Parshikov V.V., Loginov V.I., Baburin A.B., Kasimov R.R. Half-century way of development of prevention of infectious complications in postoperative wounds. Meditsinskiy vestnik Bashkortostana. 2017; (1): 82–93. (In Russ.)

[12] Паршиков В.В., Логинов В.И., Бабурин А.Б., Касимов Р.Р. Полувековой путь развития профилактики инфекционных осложнений в послеоперационных ранах. Мед. вестн. Башкортостана. 2017; (1): 82-93.

[13] Fedoseev A.V., Inyutin A.S., Zhanygulov A.D. et al. Comparative ana­lysis of the ways of laparotomy wound closure. Khirurgiya. 2017; (6): 37–40. (In Russ.)

[14] Федосеев А.В., Инютин А.С., Жаныгулов А.Д. и др. Сравнительный анализ способов ушивания лапаротомной раны. Хирургия. 2017; (6): 37-40. DOI: 10.17116/hirurgia2017637-40.

[15] Kulish N.I., Yakovets Yu.I. A method of surgical wound closure. Patent for invention RF №1268151 issued on 07.11.1986. Bull. №41. (In Russ.)

[16] Кулиш Н.И., Яковец Ю.И. Способ ушивания операционной раны. Патент РФ №1268151 от 07.11.1986. Бюлл. №41.

[17] Izmaylov S.G., Lukoyanychev E.E., Svetozarskiy N.L. et al. An instrument for treating wound cavity. Patent for invention RF №2565832 issued on 20.09.2015. Bull. №29. (In Russ.)

[18] Измайлов С.Г., Лукоянычев Е.Е., Светозарский Н.Л. и др. Инструмент для обработки раневой полости. Патент РФ №2565832 от 20.09.2015. Бюлл. №29.

[19] Izmaylov S.G., Izmaylov G.A. Novye tekhnologii v khirurgii. Monografiya. (New technologies in surgery. Monograph.) Nizhny Novgorod: Izd-vo NGMA. 2004; 340 р. (In Russ.)

[20] Измайлов С.Г., Измайлов Г.А. Новые технологии в хирургии. Монография. Нижний Новгород: Изд-во НГМА. 2004; 340 с.

[21] Izmaylov S.G., Bodrov A.A., Lazarev V.M., Trifonov R.V. A method of predicting suppurative inflammatory complications of post­operative wounds. Patent for invention RF №2160560 issued on 20.12.2000. Bull. №35. (In Russ.)

[22] Измайлов С.Г., Бодров А.А., Лазарев В.М., Трифонов Р.В. Способ прогнозирования гнойно-воспалительных осложнений послеоперационных ран. Патент РФ №2160560 от 20.12.2000. Бюлл. №35.

[23] Dindo D., Demartines N., Clavien P.A. Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evalu­ation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann. Surg. 2004; 240 (2): 205–213. DOI: 10.1097/01.sla.0000133083.54934.ae.

[24] Dindo D., Demartines N., Clavien P.A. Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann. Surg. 2004; 240 (2): 205-213. DOI: 10.1097/01.sla.0000133083.54934.ae.

[25] Petrov S.V. Obshchaya khirurgiya. (General surgery.) Saint Petersburg: Lan’. 1999; 672 р. (In Russ.)

[26] Петров С.В. Общая хирургия. СПб: Лань. 1999; 672 с.

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

Izmaylov S.G., Ryabkov M.G., Leont’ev A.E., Beschastnov V.V., Izmaylov A.G., Lukoyanychev E.E.