Analyzing the reasons for patients’ dissatisfaction with the results of multifocal intraocular lens implantation

Abstract

Aim. To analyze the causes for patients’ dissatisfaction with the results of multifocal intraocular lens implantation. Methods. The research is based on the results of cataract surgeries in 220 patients (50 patients were implanted multifocal refractive intraocular «M-flex» lens, 40 - multifocal intraocular «Gradiol» lens, 64 - multifocal intraocular «Accord» lens, 66 - monofocal intraocular lens). Pre-and post-operative examination included visual acuity test (with and without correction to near, far and moderate distances), determination of the nearest point of clear vision, contrast sensitivity study using the «Zebra» software, stereo vision test, pupil diameter measuring, refractometry, keratometry, binocular vision color tests, patient questioning. Pre-operative evaluation was performed 1 day prior to surgery. Post-operative observation was carried out 1 week, 1, 3, 6 and 12 months after the surgery. Results. No statistically significant difference (p >0.05) in uncorrected visual acuity at different light intensity - 102 lux and 416 lux - was found between the groups with different types of multifocal intraocular lenses. In groups with multifocal intraocular lenses light side effects were observed in 46-52.5% of patients. However, there was no link between the light side effects and patients’ satisfaction with results of the surgery. Reduction of spatial contrast sensitivity parameters was registered in all groups of multifocal intraocular lenses patients compared to patients with monofocal intraocular lenses (p <0.05). According to the survey results, 92.5 to 94% of patients with multifocal intraocular lenses did not report decreased visual acuity on moderate distance. Conclusion. The most important reason for patients’ dissatisfaction with the results of the multifocal intraocular lenses implanting was the reduction of spatial-contrast sensitivity parameters. Bilateral multifocal intraocular lenses implanting improved the contrast ratio.

Keywords

cataract / multifocal intraocular lens / visual acuity / spatial-contrast sensitivity / dissatisfaction with the results of the surgery

References

[1] Малюгин Б.Э., Тахтаев Ю.В., Морозова Т.А., Поздееева Н.А. Результаты мультицентровых исследований имплантации мультифокальной градиентной ИОЛ третьего поколения (Градиол-3) // Офтальмохирургия. - 2002. - №2. - С. 36-38.

[2] Тахтаев Ю.В., Балашевич Л.И. Первый опыт клинического применения мультифокальных интраокулярных линз AcrySof Restor // Офтальмохирургия. - 2004. - №3. - С. 30-34.

[3] Чередник В.И. Моделирование оптической линзы // Известия РАЕН, сер. Математика. Математическое моделирование. Информатика и управление. - 2004. - Т. 8, №1-2. - C. 68-86.

[4] Agresta B., Knorz M.C., Kohnen T. et al. Distance and near visual acuity improvement after implantation of multifocal intraocular lenses in cataract patients with presbyopia: a systematic review // J. Refract Surg. - 2012. - Vol. 28, N 6. - Р. 426-435.

[5] Chen W.R., Ye H.H., Qian Y.Y. et al. Comparison of higher-order aberrations and contrast sensitivity between Tecnis Z9001 and CeeOn 911A intraocular lenses: a prospective randomized study // Chinese medical journal. - 2006. - Vol. 119, N 21. - Р. 1779-1784.

[6] Ferrer-Blasco T., Madrid-Costa D., García-Lázaro S. et al. Stereopsis in bilaterally multifocal pseudophakic patients // Graefes Arch. Clin. Exp. Ophthalmol. - 2011. - Vol. 249, N 2. - Р. 245-251.

[7] Guttman C. Previous RK may be contraindication to multifocal IOL // Ophthalm. Times. - 1999. - Vol. 24, N 19. - P. 46.

[8] Hütz W.W., Jäckel R., Hoffman P.C. Comparison of visual performance of silicone and acrylic multifocal IOLs utilizing the same diffractive design // Acta Ophthalm. - 2010. - Vol. 17. - Р. 857-861.

[9] Lane S.S., Javitt J.C., Nethery D.A. et al. Improvements in patient-reported outcomes and visual acuity after bilateral implantation of multifocal intraocular lenses with +3.0 diopter addition: multicenter clinical trial // J. Cataract Refract. Surg. - 2010. - Vol. 36, N 11. - Р. 1887-1896.

[10] Mesci C., Erbil H.H., Olgun A. et al. Differences in contrast sensitivity between monofocal, multifocal and accommodating intraocular lenses: long-term results // Clin. Experiment. Ophthalmol. - 2010. - Vol. 38, N 8. - P. 768-777.

[11] Wang W.Y., Wang J., Zhang J. et al. Clinical observation on visual quality in patients implanted with monofocal and multifocal aspheric intraocular lenses // Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi - 2010. - Vol. 46, N 8. - P. 686-690.

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

Ivonin K.S.