Assessment of premorbid background in pregnant women with obesity of various degrees
Ch K Kalkanbaeva , N Dzh Shoonaeva , R S Asakeeva , F R Niyazova , A K Dzhakypova
Kazan medical journal ›› 2017, Vol. 98 ›› Issue (6) : 913 -917.
Assessment of premorbid background in pregnant women with obesity of various degrees
Aim. Comparative evaluation of premorbid background in pregnant women with obesity of various degrees. Methods. A comparative evaluation of premorbid background in 82 pregnant women with obesity class 1 (49 patients), class 2 (22) and class 3 (11) and 65 somatically healthy females was performed on the basis of somatic and obstetric and gynecological history. Results. In obese females in 30.5% of cases menstruation disorders were observed, most pronounced in obesity class 3 that exceeds the number in control group by 3.0 times. Out from gynecological diseases, in pregnant women with obesity class 2 and 3 the most common were colpitis - 2.0 and 2.6 times more prevalent, adnexitis - 1.5 and 1.2 times more, cervical erosion - 1.8 and 2.4 times more, endometritis - 2.2 and 1.5 times more, secondary infertility - 3.0 and 6.1 times more prevalent than in the control group. In comparison with the control group, in obesity class 2 and 3, respiratory diseases were diagnosed 1.3 and 2.5 times more often; cardiovascular disease - 2.9 and 5.9 times more, arterial hypertension - 3.0 and 12.1 times more, chronic gastritis - 1.3 and 1.7 times more, chronic cholecystitis - 1.2 and 2.4 times more, and chronic pyelonephritis - 1.8 and 2.4 times more often. Conclusion. In pregnant obese women a high prevalence of gynecological and somatic diseases was detected, that creates unfavorable conditions for pregnancy; the obtained results have a prognostic value in terms of pre-conceptional preparation of obese women.
obesity / pregnancy / dysmenorrhoea / gynecological diseases / extragenital pathology
| [1] |
Дедов И.И., Мельниченко Г.А. Ожирение: этиология, патогенез, клинические аспекты. М.: МИА. 2006; 456 с. |
| [2] |
Despres J.P., Arsenault B.J., Cote M. et al. Abdominal obesity: the cholesterol of the 21st century? Can. J. Cardiol. 2008; 24 (Suppl. D): 7-12. DOI: 10.1016/S0828-282X(08)71043-2. |
| [3] |
Леваков С.А., Боровкова Е.И. Беременность на фоне ожирения и метаболического синдрома. Вопр. гинекол., акушерства и перинатол. 2014; 13 (5): 5-10. |
| [4] |
Stotland N.E., Washington A.E., Caughey A.B. Prepregnancy body mass index and the length of gestation at term. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2007; 197 (4): 378.e1-378.e5. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2007.05.048. |
| [5] |
Макаров И.О., Боровкова Е.И., Байрамова М.А. Течение беременности и родов у пациенток с ожирением. Акушерство, гинекол. и репрод. 2011; (1): 23-28. |
| [6] |
Бурлев В.А., Тимошина И.В., Ильясова Н.А. и др. Жировая железа: молекулярные и функциональные особенности у беременных женщин. Пробл. репродукции. 2012; (5): 9-17. |
| [7] |
Djiane J., Attig L. Role of leptin during perinatal metabolic programming and obesity. J. Physiol. Pharmacol. 2008; 59 (Suppl. 1): 55-63. PMID: 18802216. |
| [8] |
Прилепская В.Н., Иллагова Е.В. Ожирение: клиника, диагностика, лечение. М.: Медпресс-информ. 2007; 64 с. |
| [9] |
Комшилова К.А., Дзгоева Ф.Х. Беременность и ожирение. Ожирение и метаболизм. 2009; (4): 9-13. |
| [10] |
Иллагова Е.В. Ожирение и репродуктивная функция: современный взгляд на проблему. Пробл. репродукции. 2012; (4): 23-27. |
Kalkanbaeva C.K., Shoonaeva N.D., Asakeeva R.S., Niyazova F.R., Dzhakypova A.K.
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |