Diagnostic aspects of closed abdominal injuries
I S Malkov , V A Filippov , V N Korobkov , Kh M Khalilov , M R Tagirov , I M Gabitov
Kazan medical journal ›› 2016, Vol. 97 ›› Issue (6) : 892 -897.
Diagnostic aspects of closed abdominal injuries
Aim. To study diagnostic value of various diagnostic methods for patients with closed abdominal injury, to develop a diagnostic algorithm to make a reasonable conclusion about the amount and severity of injuries of the abdomen.
Methods. Various diagnostic methods used in closed abdominal injuries from 120 patients admitted to Surgical Department №2 of Kazan city clinical hospital №7 from 2007 to 2015 were analyzed. Majority of victims (65%) with closed abdominal trauma were males aged 20 to 50 years.
Results. Efficiency of diagnostic program for patients with closed abdominal injury used in clinical practice was studied. In a closed abdominal trauma, injury of abdominal organs was detected in 52.5% of patients. 71.4% of those injuries were isolated and 28.6% were concomitant. According to frequency of injuries liver took the first place 15 (23.8%), followed by spleen on the second place (14; 22.2%) and kidneys (12; 19.1%) and intestine (12; 19.1%) on the third, bladder on the fourth (7; 11.1%), and pancreas on the fifth place (3; 4.8%). Importance of radiological methods and laparoscopy was demonstrated. Clinical examination and laboratory diagnostic techniques allow making a timely diagnosis in only 40% of victims. Informativity of radiologic study was 64%. The accuracy of ultrasound in damaged kidneys was 100%, that in rupture of liver was 72%, of spleen, 69%, and of the intestine (0%). Diagnostic accuracy of laparoscopy was 98.9%.
Conclusion. Experience and extensive acquaintance with modern literature allowed the authors to present the algorithm of examination of patients with suspected closed abdominal trauma.
closed injuries of the abdomen / diagnosis / laparoscopy / radiologic diagnostic methods
| [1] |
Алимов А.Н., Исаев А.Ф., Сафронов Э.П. и др. Хирургическая тактика и перспективы эндохирургии закрытых повреждений живота при тяжёлой сочетанной травме. Хирургия. 2006; (1): 34-37. |
| [2] |
Анисимов А.Ю. Организация хирургической помощи поражённым с травмами живота при чрезвычайных ситуациях мирного времени. Казанский мед. ж. 2001; (3): 203-207. |
| [3] |
Горшков С.З., Волков В.С. Закрытые повреждения живота. М.: Медицина. 1978; 214 с. |
| [4] |
Касумьян С.А., Некрасов А.Ю., Покусаев Б.А. и др. Возможности лапароскопической технологии в ургентной хирургии. Эндоскоп. хир. 2001; (2): 3. |
| [5] |
Лосев Р.З., Кузнецов В.В., Чирков Ю.В. и др. Значение неотложной лапароскопии и математического прогнозирования в комплексных диагностических мероприятиях при сочетанной травме. Вестн. хир. им. Грекова. 2004; (2): 56-59. |
| [6] |
Майстренко Н.А. Неотложная эндовидеохирургия острых заболеваний, ранений и травм живота. СПб.: Комитет по здравоохранению Правительства Ленинградской области. 2001; 56 с. |
| [7] |
Молитвословов А.Б., Бокарев М.И., Мамонтов Р.Е. и др. Диагностика повреждений живота при сочетанной травме. Хирургия. 2002; (9): 22-26. |
| [8] |
Ситников В.Н., Черкасов М.Ф., Литвинов Б.И. и др. Видеоэндохирургическая диагностика и лечение повреждений живота при сочетанной травме. Хирургия. 2006; (7): 45-50. |
| [9] |
Chen R.J., Fang J.F., Lin B.C., Kao J.L. Laparoscopic decompression of abdominal compartment syndrome after blunt hepatic trauma. J. Surg. Endosc. 2000; 10 (14): 966-968. |
| [10] |
Gastinger J., Schilling H., Recknagel F. Zu Anteil und Schwere der Schadel. - Thorax-Abdominal Verletzungen beim Polytraume des Schweregrades. Zbl. Chir. 1990; 115 (4): 201-208. |
| [11] |
Toutouzas K.G., Velmahos G.C., Kaminski A.K. et al. Leukocytosis after posttraumatic splenectomy: a physiologic event or sign of sepsis? Arch. Surg. 2002; 137 (8): 924-928. http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/archsurg.137.8.924 |
Malkov I.S., Filippov V.A., Korobkov V.N., Khalilov K.M., Tagirov M.R., Gabitov I.M.
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |
PDF
