Textural characteristics of subchondral bone in osteoarthritis

Abstract

Aim. To assess the relationship between textural characteristics of the subchondral bone and standard X-ray data, to determine markers of subchondral bone remodeling in gonarthrosis.

Methods. The studied group included 92 patients aged 66.1±10.5 years with I-IV grades osteoarthritis by the Kellgren, in the comparison group - 24 volunteers aged 29.6±5.96 years without clinical or radiological signs of gonarthrosis. Standard digital X-ray of the knee joint was performed. On the image, the area of interest was chosen, including a portion of the subchondral bone of 48±2×90±4 pixels of size. According to the area texture, the gray-level histogram and 3D graph of the pixels intensity distribution in area were made.

Results. The distribution of individual pixel values relating to the average gray-level values showed an inverse correlation with the disease stage (r=-0.52, p=0.00004) and the presence of large osteophytes (r=-0.40, p=0.002). Extremum of 3D histogram minimum value directly correlated with radiographic stage of gonarthrosis (r=0.42, p=0.0009), patients’ age (r=0.33, p=0.01) and the osteophytes number (r=0.43, p=0.0007). This figure was higher in the group of patients with osteoarthritis (p=0.009) and significantly decreased with the disease progression (p=0.04).

Conclusion. For the first time the analysis of 3D surface reconstruction depending on the gray-level pixel values was used, which showed good characteristics on the distinguishing groups of patients with osteoarthritis, and comparability with standard radiographic protocol data; the best results demonstrated the minimum value at 3D histogram that had significant variation depending on the disease stage.

Keywords

osteoarthritis / texture analysis / subchondral bone / radiography / histogram

References

[1] Андреев Г.А. Анализ и синтез случайных пространственных текстур. Зарубежн. радиоэлектроника. 1984; 2: 3-33.

[2] Кабалык М.А., Дубиков А.И., Петрикеева Т.Ю. и др. Феномен микрокристаллического стресса при остеоартрозе. Тихоокеан. мед. ж. 2014; 1: 70-74.

[3] Baltasar S.A., Gonzalez S.A. A quantitative method for the characterization of lytic metastases of the bone from radiographic images. Sci. World J. 2014; 2014: 264836.

[4] Burnett W., Kontulainen S., McLennan C. et al. Patella bone density is lower in knee osteoarthritis patients experiencing moderate-to-severe pain at rest. J. Musculoskelet. Neur. Interact. 2016; 16 (1): 33-39.

[5] Chai H.Y., Swee T.T., Seng G.H., Wee L.K. Multipurpose contrast enhancement on epiphyseal plates and ossification centers for bone age assessment. Biomed. Eng. Online. 2013; 12: 27. http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1475-925X-12-27

[6] Grbatinić I., Milošević N.T. Incipient UV-Induced structural changes in neutrophil granulocytes: Morphometric and texture analysis of two-dimensional digital images. Microsc. Microanal. 2016; 24: 1-7. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s1431927616000532

[7] Guermazi A., Hunter D.J., Li L. et al. Different thresholds for detecting osteophytes and joint space narrowing exist between the site investigators and the centralized reader in a multicenter knee osteoarthritis study - data from the Osteoarthritis Initiative. Skeletal. Radiol. 2012; 41: 179-186. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00256-011-1142-2

[8] Harris-Love M.O., Seamon B.A., Teixeira C., Ismail C. Ultrasound estimates of muscle quality in older adults: reliability and comparison of Photoshop and ImageJ for the grayscale analysis of muscle echogenicity. Peer. J. 2016; 4: e1721.

[9] Hirvasniemi J., Thevenot J., Kokkonen H.T. et al. Correlation of subchondral bone density and structure from plain radiographs with micro computed tomography ex vivo. Ann. Biomed. Eng. 2015 Sep. 14.

[10] Hochberg M.C., Yerges-Armstrong L., Yau M., Mitchell B.D. Genetic epidemiology of osteoarthritis: recent developments and future directions. Curr. Opin. Rheumatol. 2013; 25 (2): 192-197. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/BOR.0b013e32835cfb8e

[11] Huang H., Richards M., Bedair T. et al. Effects of orthodontic treatment on human alveolar bone density distribution. Clin. Oral. Investig. 2013; 17 (9): 2033-2040. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00784-012-0906-y

[12] Jones G. What’s new in osteoarthritis pathogenesis? Intern. Med. J. 2016; 46 (2): 229-236. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/imj.12763

[13] Lawrence R.C., Felson D.T., Helmick C.G. et al. Estimates of the prevalence of arthritis and other rheumatic conditions in the United States. Part II. Arthritis Rheum. 2008; 58: 26-35. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/art.23176

[14] Li M., Fu S., Zhu Y. et al. Computed tomography texture analysis to facilitate therapeutic decision making in hepatocellular carcinoma. Oncotarget. 2016 Feb. 17.

[15] Roemer F.W., Jarraya M., Niu J. et al. Knee joint subchondral bone structure alterations in active athletes: a cross-sectional case-control study. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2015; 23 (12): 2184-2190. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joca.2015.07.002

[16] Stokholm R., Spin-Neto R., Nyengaard J.R., Isidor F. Comparison of radiographic and histological assessment of peri-implant bone around oral implants. Clin. Oral. Implants. Res. 2015 Sep 26.

[17] Yao J.J., Zhou G.Q., Jin Y.N. et al. Predictors of mastoiditis after intensity-modulated radiotherapy in nasopharyngeal carcinoma: A dose-volume analysis. J. Cancer. 2016; 7 (3): 276-282. http://dx.doi.org/10.7150/jca.13183

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

Kabalyk M.A.