Pathogenetic associations of indicators of prenatal screening of the firsr trimester of pregnancy with fetal growth retardation

Andrew A. Dektyarev , Elena V. Kudryavtseva , Vladislav V. Kovalev

Perm Medical Journal ›› 2022, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (1) : 11 -20.

PDF
Perm Medical Journal ›› 2022, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (1) :11 -20. DOI: 10.17816/pmj39111-20
Original studies
research-article

Pathogenetic associations of indicators of prenatal screening of the firsr trimester of pregnancy with fetal growth retardation

Author information +
History +
PDF

Abstract

Objective. To determine the relationship between the indicators of prenatal screening of the 1st trimester and the intrauterine growth retardation (IUGR).

Materials and methods. A prospective cohort study was carried out. Group 1 included 75 patients with fetal intrauterine growth retardation, group 2 – 414 women who gave birth to a live, full-term healthy baby with normal weight and height parameters. In all patients, the anamnestic parameters, indicators of PAPP-A, b-hCG, PlGF, thickness of the collar space and the pulsation index of the uterine arteries (PI UA) were compared.

Results. A number of significant differences in the anamnestic parameters were found between the groups. In group 1, multiparous women were met more often (16 % compared with 2.9% in group 2, p<0.001), women after сesarean section (13.3% and 5.6%, respectively, p=0.013), women with a history of spontaneous and artificial abortions (46.7% and 34.1 %, p=0.036). In addition, in group 1, patients were more likely to have uterine myoma – in 9.3 % versus 3.4% in group 2 (p=0.019). In group 1, during the first trimester screening, PAPP-A values ​​were lower – 1.238 (0.68–2.05) IU/ml versus 2.25 (1.28–3.9) IU/ml in group 2 (p<0.001), and PlGF – 13.73 (10.22–19.09) IU/ml versus 17.19 (12.1–25.38) in group 2 (p=0.002). There were no significant differences in the level of b-hCG. The average pulsation index of the uterine arteries, on the contrary, in group 1 in the first trimester was higher than in group 2 – 1.73 (1.42–2.11) and 1.55 (1.32–1.85), respectively (p=0.024).

Conclusions. Thus, a number of anamnestic data and screening indicators for the first trimester have a statistically significant relationship with the presence of IUGR of the fetus; therefore, these indicators can be used to assess the risk of this pregnancy complication.

Keywords

Small-for-gestational-age fetuses / IUGR / prenatal screening / great obstetric syndromes / antenatal fetal death / prediction and projection

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Andrew A. Dektyarev, Elena V. Kudryavtseva, Vladislav V. Kovalev. Pathogenetic associations of indicators of prenatal screening of the firsr trimester of pregnancy with fetal growth retardation. Perm Medical Journal, 2022, 39(1): 11-20 DOI:10.17816/pmj39111-20

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

Walter A., Böckenhoff P., Geipel A., Gembruch U., Engels A.C. Early sonographic evaluation of the placenta in cases with IUGR: a pilot study. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2020; 302: 337-343.

[2]

Walter A., Böckenhoff P., Geipel A., Gembruch U., Engels A.C. Early sonographic evaluation of the placenta in cases with IUGR: a pilot study. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2020; 302: 337–343.

[3]

Smith G.C.S. Universal screening for foetal growth restriction. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 2018; 49: 16-28.

[4]

Smith G.C.S. Universal screening for foetal growth restriction. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 2018; 49: 16–28.

[5]

Kovalev V.V., Kudryavtseva V.V., Belomestnov S.R., Milyaeva N.M., Bezukladnova A.A., Cherevko I.V. The risl factors of the antenatal fetal death. Uralskiy Meditsinskiy Journal 2019; 15: 13-17 (in Russian).

[6]

Ковалев В.В., Кудрявцева Е.В., Беломестнов С.Р., Миляева Н.М., Безукладнова А.А., Черевко И.В. Факторы риска антенатальной гибели плода. Уральский медицинский журнал 2019; 15: 13–17.

[7]

Kesavan K., Devaskar S.U. Intrauterine Growth Restriction: Postnatal Monitoring and Outcomes. Pediatr Clin North Am 2019; 66: 403-423.

[8]

Kesavan K., Devaskar S.U. Intrauterine Growth Restriction: Postnatal Monitoring and Outcomes. Pediatr Clin North Am 2019; 66: 403–423.

[9]

Hansen D.N., Odgaard H.S., Uldbjerg N., Sinding M., Sørensen A. Screening for small-for-gestational-age fetuses. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2020; 99: 503-509.

[10]

Hansen D.N., Odgaard H.S., Uldbjerg N., Sinding M., Sørensen A. Screening for small-for-gestational-age fetuses. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2020; 99: 503–509.

[11]

Hendrix M., Bons J., van Haren A., van Kuijk S., van Doorn W., Kimenai D.M., Bekers O., Spaanderman M., Al-Nasiri S. Role of sFlt-1 and PlGF in the screening of small-for-gestational age neonates during pregnancy: A systematic review. Ann Clin Biochem 2020; 57: 44-58.

[12]

Hendrix M., Bons J., van Haren A., van Kuijk S., van Doorn W., Kimenai D.M., Bekers O., Spaanderman M., Al-Nasiri S. Role of sFlt-1 and PlGF in the screening of small-for-gestational age neonates during pregnancy: A systematic review. Ann Clin Biochem 2020; 57: 44–58.

[13]

ACOG. Practice Bullettin No 204: Fetal growth restriction. Am Coll Obstet Gynecol 2019; 133: 1-25.

[14]

ACOG. Practice Bullettin No 204: Fetal growth restriction. Am Coll Obstet Gynecol 2019; 133: 1–25.

[15]

Wardinger J.E., Ambati S. Placental Insufficiency. Treasure Island StatPearls Publishing 2021: PMID: 33085318.

[16]

Wardinger J.E., Ambati S. Placental Insufficiency. Treasure Island StatPearls Publishing 2021; PMID: 33085318.

[17]

Bolehovská P., Sehnal B., Driák D., Halaška M., Magner M., Novotný J., Svandona I. Changes in placental angiogenesis and their correlation with foetal intrauterine restriction. Ces Gynekol 2015; 80: 144-150.

[18]

Bolehovská P., Sehnal B., Driák D., Halaška M., Magner M., Novotný J., Svandona I. Changes in placental angiogenesis and their correlation with foetal intrauterine restriction. Ces Gynekol 2015; 80: 144–150.

[19]

Aditya I., Tat V., Sawana A., Mohamed A., Tuffner R., Mondal T. Use of Doppler velocimetry in diagnosis and prognosis of intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR): A Review. J Neonatal Perinatal Med 2016; 9: 117-126.

[20]

Aditya I., Tat V., Sawana A., Mohamed A., Tuffner R., Mondal T. Use of Doppler velocimetry in diagnosis and prognosis of intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR): A Review. J Neonatal Perinatal Med 2016; 9: 117–126.

[21]

Chu A., Dhindsa Y., Sim M.S., Altendahl M., Tsui I. Prenatal intrauterine growth restriction and risk of retinopathy of prematurity. Sci Rep 2020; 10: 17591.

[22]

Albu A.R., Anca A.F., Horhoianu V.V., Horhoianu I.A. Predictive factors for intrauterine growth restriction. J Med Life 2014; 7: 165-171.

[23]

Albu A.R., Anca A.F., Horhoianu V.V., Horhoianu I.A. Predictive factors for intrauterine growth restriction. J Med Life 2014; 7: 165–171.

[24]

Kudryavtseva E.V., Kovalev V.V., Baranov I.I., Vshivtsev K.S., Arebyev E.V., Bayazitova N.N. Correlation of prenatal screening indicators of the 1 trimester with the risk of pregnancy complecation. Akusherstvo i ginekologiia. Novosti. Mneniai. Obucheniye 2020; 1 (27): 38-46 (in Russian).

[25]

Кудрявцева Е.В., Ковалев В.В., Баранов И.И., Вшивцев К.С., Аребьев Э.В., Баязитова Н.Н. Взаимосвязь показателей I триместра с риском осложнений беременности. Акушерство и гинекология. Новости. Мнения. Обучение 2020; 1 (27): 38–46.

[26]

Dubrovina S.O., Muzalchanova Yu.S., Vasil’eva V.V. Early prediction of preeclampsia (literature review). Problemi reproductsii 2018; 24 (3): 67-73 (in Russian).

[27]

Дубровина С.О., Муцалханова Ю.С., Васильева В.В. Раннее прогнозирование преэклампсии (обзор литературы). Проблемы репродукции 2018; 24 (3): 67–73.

[28]

Sitnikov A.F., Zilber N.A., Ababkov S.G., Ankudinov N.O., Trofimova N.L., Karimov R.N. Regional obstetric monitoring. Version 1.2: automated system. RU 2017619189 2017 (in Russian).

[29]

Ситников А.Ф., Зильбер Н.А., Абабков С.Г., Анкудинов Н.О., Трофимова Н.Л., Каримов Р.Н. Региональный акушерский мониторинг. Версия 1.2: автоматизированная система. RU 2017619189 2017.

[30]

Lees C.C., Stampalija T., Baschat A., da Silva Costa F., Ferrazzi E., Figueras F., Hecher K., Kingdom J., Poon L.C., Salomon L.J., Unterscheider J. ISUOG Practice Guidelines: diagnosis and management of small-for-gestational-age fetus and fetal growth restriction. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2020; 56: 298-312.

[31]

Lees C.C., Stampalija T., Baschat A., da Silva Costa F., Ferrazzi E., Figueras F., Hecher K., Kingdom J., Poon L.C., Salomon L.J., Unterscheider J. ISUOG Practice Guidelines: diagnosis and management of small-for-gestational-age fetus and fetal growth restriction. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2020; 56: 298–312.

[32]

Gordijn S.J., Beune I.M., Thilaganathan B., Papageorghiou A., Baschat A.A., Baker P.N., Silver R.M., Wynia K., Ganzevoort W. Consensus definition of fetal growth restriction: a Delphi procedure. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol Off J Int Soc Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2016; 48: 333-339.

[33]

Gordijn S.J., Beune I.M., Thilaganathan B., Papageorghiou A., Baschat A.A., Baker P.N., Silver R.M., Wynia K., Ganzevoort W. Consensus definition of fetal growth restriction: a Delphi procedure. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol Off J Int Soc Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2016; 48: 333–339.

[34]

Bilagi A., Burke D.L., Riley R.D., Mills I., Kilby M.D., Katie Morris R. Association of maternal serum PAPP-A levels, nuchal translucency and crown-rump length in first trimester with adverse pregnancy outcomes: retrospective cohort study. Prenat Diagn 2017; 37: 705-711.

[35]

Bilagi A., Burke D.L., Riley R.D., Mills I., Kilby M.D., Katie Morris R. Association of maternal serum PAPP-A levels, nuchal translucency and crown-rump length in first trimester with adverse pregnancy outcomes: retrospective cohort study. Prenat Diagn 2017; 37: 705–711.

[36]

Morris R.K., Bilagi A., Devani P., Kilby M.D. Association of serum PAPP-A levels in first trimester with small for gestational age and adverse pregnancy outcomes: systematic review and meta-analysis. Prenat Diagn 2017; 37: 253-265.

[37]

Morris R.K., Bilagi A., Devani P., Kilby M.D. Association of serum PAPP-A levels in first trimester with small for gestational age and adverse pregnancy outcomes: systematic review and meta-analysis. Prenat Diagn 2017; 37: 253–265.

[38]

Samchuk P.M., Azoeva E.L., Ishcenko A.I., Rozalieva U.U. Prenatal screening as a predictor of gestational complecations. Voprosi ginekologii, akusherstva i perinatologii 2020; 19: 5-11 (in Russian).

[39]

Самчук П.М., Азоева Е.Л., Ищенко А.И., Розалиева Ю.Ю. Пренатальный скрининг как предиктор гестационных осложнений. Вопросы гинекологии, акушерства и перинатологии 2020; 19: 5–11.

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

Dektyarev A.A., Kudryavtseva E.V., Kovalev V.V.

AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF

264

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

AI思维导图

/