Characteristic of epidemiological process of tick-borne viral encephalitis in child population of Siberian federal district regions

Sergei V. Shirokostup , Natalya V. Lukyanenko

Perm Medical Journal ›› 2019, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (1) : 84 -90.

PDF
Perm Medical Journal ›› 2019, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (1) :84 -90. DOI: 10.17816/pmj36184-90
Preventive and social medicine
research-article

Characteristic of epidemiological process of tick-borne viral encephalitis in child population of Siberian federal district regions

Author information +
History +
PDF

Abstract

Aim. To detect the characteristics of the epidemic process of tick-borne encephalitis among the child population of the regions of Siberian Federal District with evaluation of the efficiency of preventive measures regarding this infection.

Materials and methods. The data of official statistical reports of Rospotrebnadzor, regional healthcare services were used in the study. Data processing was fulfilled using the program Statistica 13.0.

Results. Over the period from 2000 to 2017, a mean long-term tick-borne encephalitis morbidity rate among the persons under seventeen in Siberian Federal District was 6.2 ± 1.39 0/0000 that is by 39.7 % lower than the analogous index in the adult population (8.7 ± 0.82 0/0000, p < 0,001). In the study, there was analyzed the efficiency of preventive measures among children and adolescents and revealed the leading factors, essentially influencing the formation of a tendency of tick-borne viral encephalitis morbidity.

Conclusions. The territories of potential risk for this infection within the borders of SFD among the child population were determined.

Keywords

Tick-borne viral encephalitis / prevention / endemic territories / feral herd infections / risk groups

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Sergei V. Shirokostup, Natalya V. Lukyanenko. Characteristic of epidemiological process of tick-borne viral encephalitis in child population of Siberian federal district regions. Perm Medical Journal, 2019, 36(1): 84-90 DOI:10.17816/pmj36184-90

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

Ильинских Н.Н., Ильинских Е.Н. Возрастные особенности цитогенетических последствий весенне-летнего клещевого энцефалита у жителей севера Западной Сибири в связи с полиморфизмом по генам глутатион-s-трансферазы. Успехи геронтологии 2016; 29 (5): 756–759.

[2]

Инфекционные болезни. Клещевой энцефалит: нац. руководство. Под ред. Н.Д. Ющука, Ю.Я. Венгерова М.: ГЭОТАР-Медиа 2018; 971. (Серия «Национальные руководства»).

[3]

Позднякова Л.Л., Спиридонова Э.А., Бурмистрова Т.Г., Добровольский А.В., Казаковцев С.Л., Шестакова И.В. Клещевой вирусный энцефалит у взрослых: клинические рекомендации. М.: Министерство здравоохранения РФ 2016; 26.

[4]

Щучинова Л.Д., Щучинов Л.В., Злобин В.И. Анализ факторов, оказывающих влияние на эффективность вакцинации против клещевого энцефалита. Эпидемиология и вакцинопрофилактика 2016; 87 (2): 72–76.

[5]

Kaiser R. Tick-borne encephalitis (TBE). Neurology International Open 2017; 1 (1): E48-E55.

[6]

Keesing F., Ostfeld R.S. The tick project: testing environmental methods of preventing tick-borne diseases. Trends in parasitology 2018; 34 (6): 447–450.

[7]

Kollaritsch H., Heininger U. Tick-borne encephalitis vaccines. pediatric vaccines and vaccinations. Springer, Cham 2017; 137–145.

[8]

Rodríguez Y., Rojas M., Gershwin M.E., Anaya J.M. Tick-borne diseases and autoimmunity: A comprehensive review. Journal of Autoimmunity 2017; 25. DOI: 10.1016/j.jaut.2017.11.007

[9]

Sendi P. Fatal outcome of European tick-borne encephalitis after Vaccine Failure. Frontiers in Neurology 2017; 8: 119.

[10]

Veje M. Diagnosing tick-borne ence phalitis: a re-evaluation of notified cases. European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases 2018; 37 (2): 339–344.

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

Shirokostup S.V., Lukyanenko N.V.

AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF

216

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

AI思维导图

/