ANALYSIS OF PREGNANCY COURSE IN UR.UREALYTICUM INFECTED WOMEN DEPENDING ON GENITAL TRACT COLONIZATION DEGREE

T A Melnikova; M M Padrul; E S Gorovits; G I Rabotnikova

doi:10.17816/pmj34226-30

Perm Medical Journal ›› 2017, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (2) :26 -30. DOI: 10.17816/pmj34226-30

Articles

research-article

ANALYSIS OF PREGNANCY COURSE IN UR.UREALYTICUM INFECTED WOMEN DEPENDING ON GENITAL TRACT COLONIZATION DEGREE

Author information +

History +

PDF

Abstract

Aim. To carry out the comparative analysis of pregnant anamnestic data depending on the presence and degree of genital Ur. Urealyticum colonization. Materials and methods. Pregnancy anamnesis was studied in 112 women infected with Ur. Urealyticum , including 53 women with colonization level up to 104 CFU/ml and 59 women - >104 CFU/ml. The comparison group consists of 40 uninfected with ureaplasma practically healthy pregnant women. Results. The burdened obstetric-gynecological anamnesis was essentially more often registered in pregnant women infected with ureaplasma - 74,46 % versus 55,0 % in the comparison group, mostly in women with a high titre of ureaplasma genital colonization. The main pathologies were vaginites, premature labor and postnatal infectious inflammatory complications. Chronic pyelonephritis in infected women was observed 2,5 times more often. Conclusions. Practically 80 % of Ur. Urealyticum infected pregnant women had complicated pregnancy, more frequently (84,75 %) registered in case of colonization of the genital tract with ureaplasmas in the titre of more than 104 CFU/ml.

Keywords

Ureamycoplasmosis / pregnancy / labor / complications

Cite this article

Download citation ▾

T A Melnikova, M M Padrul, E S Gorovits, G I Rabotnikova. ANALYSIS OF PREGNANCY COURSE IN UR.UREALYTICUM INFECTED WOMEN DEPENDING ON GENITAL TRACT COLONIZATION DEGREE. Perm Medical Journal, 2017, 34(2): 26-30 DOI:10.17816/pmj34226-30

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户忘记密码

References

Publishing order | Descend order by publishing year | Descend order by cited within

[1]	Борисенко К.К., Токсин И.А., Кисина В.П. О значении колонизации мочеполовых органов U. urealyticum и М. hominis. ИППП. 1999; 3: 28-31.

[2]	Владимиров Н.Н., Третьякова А.Н., Владимирова E.Н. Роль посевов содержимого из уретры и цервикального канала в выявлении уреаплазменно-микоплазменной инфекции у хронических урологических больных. Вестник последипломного медицинского образования 2002; 4: 21-22.

[3]	Данилова О.П., Никифорова Н.А. Микрофлора женских гениталий в норме и при патологии. СПб. 1997; 80.

[4]	Кузьмин В.Н. Место и роль микоплазменной инфекции в структуре воспалительных заболеваний органов малого таза. Гинекология 2015; 2: 21-26.

[5]	Лыкова С.Г., Хрянин А.А. Генитальные микоплазмы человека. Новосибирск 1999; 34.

[6]	Ранние сроки беременности. 2-е изд., испр. и доп. Под ред. В.Е. Радзинского, А.А. Оразмурадова. М.: Statuspreasens 2009; 480.

[7]	Carrol C.G., Papaioannou S., Ntumazan L.L. Colonization and transmission of Ureaplasma urealyticum and Mycoplasma hominis. Brit. J Obstet Gynec 1996; l: 54-59.

[8]	Taylor-Robinson D. Mycoplasma genitalium - making its presence felt. Материалы I Сибирского съезда акушеров-гинекологов, дерматовенерологов и урологов с междунар. участием «Сотрудничество во благо». Новосибирск 2007; 3-4.