IMMEDIATE AND REMOTE RESULTS OF THE LEFT-ATRIAL “LABYRINTH” SURGERY IN PATIENTS WITH CORONARY HEART DISEASE AND MITRAL VALVE PATHOLOGY

V B Arutyunyan , V A Chragyan , O A Osetrova

Perm Medical Journal ›› 2017, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (1) : 19 -25.

PDF
Perm Medical Journal ›› 2017, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (1) :19 -25. DOI: 10.17816/pmj34119-25
Articles
research-article

IMMEDIATE AND REMOTE RESULTS OF THE LEFT-ATRIAL “LABYRINTH” SURGERY IN PATIENTS WITH CORONARY HEART DISEASE AND MITRAL VALVE PATHOLOGY

Author information +
History +
PDF

Abstract

Aim. To assess the medium-term results of the left-atrial modification of the surgery “labyrinth-3” in 100 patients with associated pathology of the mitral valve (MV). Materials and methods. One hundred patients (mean age 62,7 ± 4,5 years) with MV pathology, protractedly persisting form of atrial fibrillation (AF) (during 18±5,1 months) ( n = 81), persisting form of AF ( n = 15) and paroxysmal form of AF ( n = 4) were examined. All patients were operated for associated MV pathology over the period from 2010 to 2012. Etiology of mitral valve damage was estimated: degenerative damages - in 62 patients, ischemic mitral insufficiency - in 30 patients, rheumatic heart disease - in 4 patients, idiopathic annulectasia and mitral insufficiency - in 4 patients. During the pre-and postoperative periods, the general clinical and echocardiographic data, the results of Holter monitoring and coronography were assessed. Results. All patients underwent the left-atrial modification of the surgery “labyrinth-3” with correction of mitral valve pathology. Thirty one patients underwent intervention associated with coronary artery bypass grafting, 33 patients - tricuspidal insufficiency correction. Hospital lethality was 3 % - 3 patients died from multiple organ failure. During the first month ( n = 96), sinus rhythm was observed in 85 (89 %) patients including mechanical systole of the left atrium - in 18 %. Eight patients (8,2 %) had atrial fibrillation, 3 (2,8 %) patients needed introduction of electrical stimulator in connection with weakness of sinus node. Six months after the surgery ( n = 71), sinus rhythm was registered in 59 (83 %) patients, mechanical systole of LA - in 55 % of them; one year after the surgery ( n = 39), sinus rhythm was detected in 31 (81 %) patients, mechanical systole of LA - in 48 %. During one year, a two-chamber electrical stimulator was introduced to 4 patients more, in connection with atrioventricular blockade. During 12 months, 80 % of patients were free from atrial fibrillation, 98,7 % were free from acute stroke. Conclusions. The procedure of the left-atrial “labyrinth” associated with correction of MV pathology does not elevate lethality and is efficient in 80 % of patients. Mechanical function frequency of LA in patients with sinus rhythm is being increased during a year in half of patients. Cumulative freedom from stroke is 98,7 % a year.

Keywords

Atrial fibrillation / “labyrinth” surgery / mitral insufficiency

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
V B Arutyunyan, V A Chragyan, O A Osetrova. IMMEDIATE AND REMOTE RESULTS OF THE LEFT-ATRIAL “LABYRINTH” SURGERY IN PATIENTS WITH CORONARY HEART DISEASE AND MITRAL VALVE PATHOLOGY. Perm Medical Journal, 2017, 34(1): 19-25 DOI:10.17816/pmj34119-25

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

Бокерия Л.А., Беришвили И.И. Хирургическая анатомия сердца. НЦССХ им. А.Н. Бакулева РАМН. М. 2006; 1: 15-55.

[2]

Бокерия Л.А., Бокерия О.Л., Биниашвили М.Б. Случай успешного хирургического лечения фибрилляции предсердий с помощью криомодификации операции «Лабиринт». Бюллетень медицинских интернет-конференций 2013; 3 (3): 490-494.

[3]

Бокерия Л.А., Бокерия О.Л., Глушко Л.А. Механизмы нарушений ритма сердца. Анналы аритмологии 2010; 3: 69-79.

[4]

Бокерия Л.А., Бокерия О.Л., Меликулов А.Х., Заварина А.Ю., Мордвинова А.С. Хирургическое лечение фибрилляции предсердий: современное состояние проблемы. Анналы аритмологии 2009; 2: 5-11.

[5]

Ailawadi G., Gerdisch M.W., Harvey R.L., Hooker R.L., Damiano R.J. Jr, Salamon T. Exclusion of the left atrial appendage with a novel device: early results of a multicenter trial. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2011; 142: 1002-1009.

[6]

Bando K., Kasegawa H., Okada Y., Kobayashi J., Kada A., Shimokawa T. Impact of preoperative and postoperative atrial fibrillation on outcome after mitral valvuloplasty for nonischemic mitral regurgitation. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2005; 129: 1032-1040.

[7]

Benussi S., Nascimbene S., Galanti A. Complete left atrial ablation with bipolar radiofrequency. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2008; 33: 590-595.

[8]

Califf R.M., Armstrong P.W., Carver J.R. 27th Bethesda Conference: matching the intensity of risk management with hazard for coronary disease events. Task force S. Stratification of patients into high, medium, and low risk subgroups for purposes of factor management. J Am Cardiol 1996; 27: 1007-1019.

[9]

Cox J.L., Ad N., Palazzo T. Impact of the maze procedure on the stroke rate in patients with atrial fibrillation. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1999; 118: 833-840.

[10]

Cox J.L. The surgical treatment of atrial fibrillation. IV. Surgical technique. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1991; 101: 584-592.

[11]

Gaynor S.L., Schuessler R.B., Bailey M.S., Ishii Y., Boineau J.P., Gleva M.J. Surgical treatment of atrial fibrillation: predictors of late recurrence. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2005; 129: 104-111.

[12]

Gillinov A.M., Sirak J., Blackstone E.H., McCarthy P.M., Rajeswaran J., Pettersson G. The Cox maze procedure in mitral valve disease: predictors of recurrent atrial fibrillation. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2005; 130: 1653-1660.

[13]

Healey J.S., Crystal E., Lamy A., Teoh K., Semelhago L., Hohnloser S.H. Left atrial appendage occlusion study (LAAOS): results of a randomized controlled pilot study of left atrial appendage occlusion during coronary bypass surgery in patients at risk for stroke. Am Heart J 2005; 150: 288-293.

[14]

Henry L., Durrani S., Hunt S., Friehling T., Tran H., Wish M. Percutaneous catheter ablation treatment of recurring atrial arrhythmias after surgical ablation. Ann Thorac Surg 2010; 89: 1227-1231.

[15]

Henry L., Schlauch K., Holmes S.D., Hunt S. The CHADS score role in managing anticoagulation after surgical ablation for atrial fibrillation. Ann Thorac Surg 2010; 90: 1257-1262.

[16]

Kanderian A.S., Gillinov A.M., Pettersson G.B., Blackstone E., Klein A.L. Success of surgical left atrial appendage closure: assessment by transesophageal echocardiography. J Am Coll Cardiol 2008; 52: 924-929.

[17]

Weerasooriya R., Khairy P., Litalien J., Macle L., Hocini M., Sacher F. Catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation: are results maintained at 5 years of follow-up? J Am Coll Cardiol 2011; 57: 160-166.

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

Arutyunyan V.B., Chragyan V.A., Osetrova O.A.

AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF

230

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

AI思维导图

/