Please wait a minute...

Frontiers of Philosophy in China

Front. Philos. China    2020, Vol. 15 Issue (1) : 143-159     https://doi.org/10.3868/s030-009-020-0009-3
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Wittgenstein’s Peculiar Use of “Internal Relation” in Aspect-Seeing
ZHANG Ligeng()
Institute of Philosophy, Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, Beijing 100732, China
Download: PDF(274 KB)  
Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks
Abstract

“Internal relation” is a significant term in both Wittgenstein’s early and later philosophy. The term is used in relation to many problems, including our topic here, “aspect-seeing.” Some scholars have attempted to present a persuasive interpretation of this terminology; however, Wittgenstein’s remarks on “aspect-seeing” somehow thwart their approaches. The obstacle lies in the relata involved: Which terms are connected by an internal relation in the perception of an aspect? In this paper, I review the existing interpretations and present two proposals, one of which is conservative and the other slightly more radical. I argue that Wittgenstein makes divergent use of the distinction between “internal/external relations,” and that this may reveal the potential ambiguities of the words “internal” and “relation.”

Keywords aspect-seeing      internal/external relations      Wittgenstein     
Issue Date: 31 March 2020
 Cite this article:   
ZHANG Ligeng. Wittgenstein’s Peculiar Use of “Internal Relation” in Aspect-Seeing[J]. Front. Philos. China, 2020, 15(1): 143-159.
 URL:  
http://journal.hep.com.cn/fpc/EN/10.3868/s030-009-020-0009-3
http://journal.hep.com.cn/fpc/EN/Y2020/V15/I1/143
Service
E-mail this article
E-mail Alert
RSS
Articles by authors
ZHANG Ligeng
Related articles from Frontiers Journals
[1] Stewart Candlish. Was Wittgenstein an Analytic Philosopher? Wittgenstein vs Russell[J]. Front. Philos. China, 2016, 11(1): 35-53.
[2] Hektor K. T. Yan. Beyond a Theory of Human Nature: Towards an Alternative Interpretation of Mencius’ Ethics[J]. Front. Philos. China, 2014, 9(3): 396-416.
[3] HAN Donghui. Performative contradiction and the regrounding for philosophical paradigms[J]. Front Phil Chin, 2008, 3(4): 607-621.
[4] LI Hong, HAN Donghui. What is “the ineffable” exactly? An extensive reading of Wittgenstein’s Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus[J]. Front. Philos. China, 2007, 2(3): 402-411.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed