Please wait a minute...

Frontiers of Philosophy in China

Front. Philos. China    2018, Vol. 13 Issue (1) : 72-90
Orginal Article |
From Humanized Nature to Naturalized Humans―Li Zehou’s Transformation of the Classical Chinese “Tianren Heyi ” Paradigm Through the Lens of Kant and Early Marx
Jana S. Rošker()
Department of Asian Studies, Faculty of Humanities, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana 1260, Slovenia
Download: PDF(237 KB)  
Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks

Li Zehou belongs among the ranks of the most important Chinese philosophers of the 20th and 21st centuries. In his complex theoretical system, he aimed to reconcile the Chinese cultural heritage with the demands of the contemporary world. Besides elaborating on traditional Chinese philosophy, Li launched many innovative views based on his understanding of specific developments in pre-modern and modern Western philosophy. His philosophy could be described as the search for a synthesis between Western and traditional Chinese thought and a specifically Chinese modernization. In order to provide a basic insight into Li’s specific methods of combining Kant, early Marx and classical Chinese philosophy, the present article investigates his elaboration of the traditional Chinese paradigm of “the unity of nature and man” (tianren heyi天人合一) through the lens of ideas about humanized nature (renhua de ziran人化的自然) and naturalized humans (ziranhua de ren自然化的人).

Keywords Li Zehou      naturalization of humans      humanization of nature      subjectality      Kant      Marx     
Issue Date: 23 April 2018
 Cite this article:   
Jana S. Ro?ker. From Humanized Nature to Naturalized Humans―Li Zehou’s Transformation of the Classical Chinese “Tianren Heyi ” Paradigm Through the Lens of Kant and Early Marx[J]. Front. Philos. China, 2018, 13(1): 72-90.
E-mail this article
E-mail Alert
Articles by authors
Jana S. Ro?ker
Related articles from Frontiers Journals
[1] PENG Guoxiang. Contemporary Chinese Philosophy in the Chinese-Speaking World: An Overview[J]. Front. Philos. China, 2018, 13(1): 91-119.
[2] DONG Xinchun. Western Marxism’s Misreading of Marx’s Critique of Capitalism[J]. Front. Philos. China, 2017, 12(3): 466-482.
[3] ZANG Fengyu. How to Construct Marxian Thoughts as a Political Philosophy?[J]. Front. Philos. China, 2015, 10(4): 601-614.
[4] Jim Shelton. Li Zehou and Moritz Schlick on the Roots of Beauty[J]. Front. Philos. China, 2014, 9(4): 602-614.
[5] Marina F. Bykova. On the Philosophical Relevance of Marx’s Views Today[J]. Front. Philos. China, 2014, 9(3): 370-380.
[6] James Swindal. Marx on Nature[J]. Front. Philos. China, 2014, 9(3): 358-369.
[7] Nicholas S. Brasovan. Conjunctions and/or Disjunctions: Radical Empiricism in the History of Philosophy[J]. Front. Philos. China, 2014, 9(1): 130-148.
[8] LIU Jing. Kant’s Virtue as Strength[J]. Front Phil Chin, 2013, 8(3): 451-470.
[9] XIE Wenyu. Kant’s Better Man and the Confucian Junzi[J]. Front Phil Chin, 2012, 7(3): 481-497.
[10] CHEN Jiaming. On the Issues of Transcendental Argument[J]. Front Phil Chin, 2012, 7(2): 255-269.
[11] YAN Mengwei. Tolerance or Hospitality?[J]. Front Phil Chin, 2012, 7(1): 154-163.
[12] WU Xiaoming. The End of the Supersensory World’s Mythology: Marx’s Ontological Revolution and Its Contemporary Significance[J]. Front Phil Chin, 2012, 7(1): 128-141.
[13] FANG Xudong. Confucian Ethics and Impartiality: On the Confucian View about Brotherhood[J]. Front Phil Chin, 2012, 7(1): 1-19.
[14] QU Hongmei. Marxism and Morality: Reflections on the History of Interpreting Marx in Moral Philosophy[J]. Front Phil Chin, 2011, 6(2): 239-257.
[15] ZHANG Yunyi. “The Westward Spread of Chinese Philosophy” and Marxism[J]. Front Phil Chin, 2011, 6(1): 114-133.
Full text