Please wait a minute...

Frontiers of Philosophy in China

Front. Philos. China    2018, Vol. 13 Issue (1) : 4-22     https://doi.org/10.3868/s030-007-018-0002-9
Orginal Article |
Xiong Shili on the Nature, the Mind and the Origin of Badness as Evidenced in Ming Xin Pian 明心篇 (Explaining the Mind )
John Makeham()
China Studies Research Centre, La Trobe University, Victoria 3086, Australia
Download: PDF(486 KB)  
Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks
Abstract

The question of the origin of badness is a core problematic in New Confucian philosopher Xiong Shili’s 熊十力 (1885–1968) Ming Xin Pian明心篇 (Explaining the Mind; 1959), a work representative of his thought towards the end of his life. In this essay, I examine how Xiong uses the concepts of the nature (xing 性) and the mind (xin 心) to explain the origin of moral badness. Xiong asserts that the Buddhists never concerned themselves with the problem of the origin of ignorance and delusion, afflictions that in turn lead to suffering and wrongdoing. Xiong sets out to redress what he claims the Buddhists had failed to do. I argue that the conceptual structure of both Xiong Shili’s and Zhu Xi’s 朱熹 (1130–1200) theoretical approaches to this problem are isomorphic. The isomorphism is significant because it suggests that Xiong consciously drew on Zhu Xi and/or the Buddhist models that Zhu in turn drew on. I provide evidence to show that even as late as 1959, and despite his increasingly entrenched criticisms of Buddhism, Xiong continued to draw on key concepts and models drawn from Buddhist philosophy of mind.

Keywords mind (xin)      nature (xing)      Xiong Shili      isomorphism      Buddhism      badness     
Issue Date: 23 April 2018
 Cite this article:   
John Makeham. Xiong Shili on the Nature, the Mind and the Origin of Badness as Evidenced in Ming Xin Pian 明心篇 (Explaining the Mind )[J]. Front. Philos. China, 2018, 13(1): 4-22.
 URL:  
http://journal.hep.com.cn/fpc/EN/10.3868/s030-007-018-0002-9
http://journal.hep.com.cn/fpc/EN/Y2018/V13/I1/4
Service
E-mail this article
E-mail Alert
RSS
Articles by authors
John Makeham
Related articles from Frontiers Journals
[1] Jim Shelton. Li Zehou and Moritz Schlick on the Roots of Beauty[J]. Front. Philos. China, 2014, 9(4): 602-614.
[2] DING Weixiang. Zhu Xi’s Choice, Historical Criticism and Influence—An Analysis of Zhu Xi’s Relationship with Confucianism and Buddhism[J]. Front Phil Chin, 2011, 6(4): 521-548.
[3] Zhang Zhiqiang. From the “Alternative School of Principles” to the Lay Buddhism: On the conceptual features of modern Consciousness-Only School from the perspective of the evolution of thought during the Ming and Qing Dynasties[J]. Front Phil Chin, 2009, 4(1): 64-87.
[4] Ma Tianxiang. Scientific analysis of Buddhism and a comparative study of Buddhism and science[J]. Front. Philos. China, 2006, 1(4): 594-629.
[5] Yao Weiqun. Buddhist Thought and Several Problems in the World Today[J]. Front. Philos. China, 2006, 1(1): 144-147.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed