Please wait a minute...

Frontiers of Philosophy in China

Front. Philos. China    2017, Vol. 12 Issue (2) : 295-305     DOI: 10.3868/s030-006-017-0021-2
Orginal Article |
Natural Realism or Transactionalism: On the Relationships between Putnam and Two Pragmatists, James and Dewey
SUN Ning()
School of Philosophy, Fudan University, Shanghai 200433, China
Download: PDF(212 KB)  
Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks
Abstract

The relationships between Hilary Putnam and the pragmatists (especially William James and John Dewey) are obvious but subtle. To shed some light on this issue, the author will explore a key issue that not only stands as Putnam’s main inheritance from the pragmatists, but that also illuminates the relationships between them more clearly than any other issues. This key issue is the understanding of perception and the philosophical position that arises from this understanding. The author argues that in adopting Dewey’s transactionalism (or interactionalism), Putnam advances from James’ insight to Dewey’s, a shift that is particularly manifest in Putnam’s attempt to add another layer of meaning to what he refers to as the second na?veté that he detects and appreciates in James’ natural realism.

Keywords Hilary Putnam      William James      John Dewey      pragmatism      perception     
Issue Date: 24 July 2017
 Cite this article:   
SUN Ning. Natural Realism or Transactionalism: On the Relationships between Putnam and Two Pragmatists, James and Dewey[J]. Front. Philos. China, 2017, 12(2): 295-305.
 URL:  
http://journal.hep.com.cn/fpc/EN/10.3868/s030-006-017-0021-2
http://journal.hep.com.cn/fpc/EN/Y2017/V12/I2/295
Service
E-mail this article
E-mail Alert
RSS
Articles by authors
SUN Ning
Related articles from Frontiers Journals
[1] Alan Fox. A Process Interpretation of Daoist Thought[J]. Front. Philos. China, 2017, 12(1): 26-37.
[2] ZHANG Weite. Descartes’ Metaphysical Doubts about Clear and Distinct Perception[J]. Front. Philos. China, 2017, 12(1): 151-181.
[3] Richard Shusterman. Somaesthetics and Chinese Philosophy: Between Unity and Pragmatist Pluralism[J]. Front. Philos. China, 2015, 10(2): 201-211.
[4] Roger T. Ames. “Bodyheartminding” (Xin 心): Reconceiving the Inner Self and the Outer World in the Language of Holographic Focus and Field[J]. Front. Philos. China, 2015, 10(2): 167-180.
[5] Sun Ning. On Generalization: Pragmatists’ Contributions to Constructivism[J]. Front. Philos. China, 2014, 9(3): 417-430.
[6] Thomas M. Robinson. Aristotle, the Intellect, and Cognition[J]. Front. Philos. China, 2014, 9(2): 229-240.
[7] Nicholas S. Brasovan. Conjunctions and/or Disjunctions: Radical Empiricism in the History of Philosophy[J]. Front. Philos. China, 2014, 9(1): 130-148.
[8] CHEN Zhen. Why We Care Whether Our Beliefs Are True: An Answer to Stephen Stich?[J]. Front Phil Chin, 2012, 7(1): 142-153.
[9] WANG Shuren. The roots of Chinese philosophy and culture — An introduction to “xiang” and “xiang thinking”[J]. Front Phil Chin, 2009, 4(1): 1-12.
[10] Cong Hangqing, Cheng Xiaodong. Pragmatic commitments to naturalized epistemology[J]. Front. Philos. China, 2006, 1(3): 477-490.
[11] Tong Shijun. “Critique” immanent in “practice”: New Frankfurt School and American pragmatism[J]. Front. Philos. China, 2006, 1(2): 295-316.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed