Please wait a minute...

Frontiers of Philosophy in China

Front. Philos. China    2017, Vol. 12 Issue (1) : 90-103     DOI: 10.3868/s030-006-017-0007-0
Orginal Article |
Growth, Experience and Nature in Dewey’s Philosophy and Chinese Philosophy
LIU Jing()
Department of Philosophy, University of Hawaii at Manoa, Hawaii 96822, USA
Download: PDF(312 KB)  
Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks
Abstract

Growth is an important concept in Dewey’s philosophy, and, indeed, its ultimate focus. It is not, however, an easy task to posit growth as an ethical ideal, for here Dewey immediately faces a metaphysical dilemma: whether to offer us an objective standard of growth, which becomes a type of absolutism, or to inevitably fall into relativism. This paper explores how Dewey avoids this dilemma with his concept of experience, which is interrogated through the relationship between human beings and nature. Still, human growth in nature involves the cultivation of virtuosities (de 德) in accordance with the rhythm of nature, and requires a completely different way of life other than our technological one. For this reason, I use Chinese philosophy, specifically ideas from the Yijing, to show how growth can be illustrated through the interaction between humans and the natural world.

Keywords Dewey      growth      experience      nature      tianren heyi 天人合一     
Issue Date: 24 April 2017
 Cite this article:   
LIU Jing. Growth, Experience and Nature in Dewey’s Philosophy and Chinese Philosophy[J]. Front. Philos. China, 2017, 12(1): 90-103.
 URL:  
http://journal.hep.com.cn/fpc/EN/10.3868/s030-006-017-0007-0
http://journal.hep.com.cn/fpc/EN/Y2017/V12/I1/90
Service
E-mail this article
E-mail Alert
RSS
Articles by authors
LIU Jing
Related articles from Frontiers Journals
[1] CHEN Yajun. Between Darwin and Hegel: On Dewey’s Concept of Experience[J]. Front. Philos. China, 2017, 12(1): 104-119.
[2] Timothy O’Leary. Critique, Ethics, and the Apparatus of Experience: A Foucauldian Framework[J]. Front. Philos. China, 2017, 12(1): 120-136.
[3] Christopher C. Chrappa. The Incomprehensible Art of Thomas Hobbes[J]. Front. Philos. China, 2016, 11(4): 680-697.
[4] CHEN Guying. The Tradition of Emotive Writing in the Zhuangzi and Its Echoes in Later Generations[J]. Front. Philos. China, 2015, 10(3): 340-352.
[5] Eva Kit Wah Man. A Cross-Cultural Reflection on Shusterman’s Suggestion of the “Transactional” Body[J]. Front. Philos. China, 2015, 10(2): 181-191.
[6] Roger T. Ames. “Bodyheartminding” (Xin 心): Reconceiving the Inner Self and the Outer World in the Language of Holographic Focus and Field[J]. Front. Philos. China, 2015, 10(2): 167-180.
[7] GUO Yi. The Origin and Differentiation of the Theories of Human Nature in Pre-Qin China[J]. Front. Philos. China, 2015, 10(2): 212-238.
[8] BAO Yongling. Water, Plant, Light, and Mirror: On the Root Metaphors of the Heart-Mind in Wang Yangming’s Thought[J]. Front. Philos. China, 2015, 10(1): 95-112.
[9] Sun Ning. On Generalization: Pragmatists’ Contributions to Constructivism[J]. Front. Philos. China, 2014, 9(3): 417-430.
[10] Hektor K. T. Yan. Beyond a Theory of Human Nature: Towards an Alternative Interpretation of Mencius’ Ethics[J]. Front. Philos. China, 2014, 9(3): 396-416.
[11] James Swindal. Marx on Nature[J]. Front. Philos. China, 2014, 9(3): 358-369.
[12] WANG Tangjia. A Philosophical Analysis of the Concept of Crisis[J]. Front. Philos. China, 2014, 9(2): 254-267.
[13] DING Ji. The Manifestation Range of Innately Good Knowledge and Ability, and the Danger of Separation: On Zhuzi’s Question about Understanding Words[J]. Front Phil Chin, 2012, 7(2): 217-243.
[14] Helen STEWARD. Agency, Properties and Causation[J]. Front Phil Chin, 2011, 6(3): 390-401.
[15] XIANG Shiling. Inquiry into the Transcendence of Tang Dynasty Confucians to Han Dynasty Confucians and the Transformation of Traditional Confucianism in Terms of Lunyu Bijie[J]. Front Phil Chin, 2010, 5(4): 471-485.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed