Please wait a minute...

Frontiers of Philosophy in China

Front. Philos. China    2016, Vol. 11 Issue (4) : 652-670     https://doi.org/10.3868/s030-005-016-0044-3
Orginal Article |
A Human Right to Internet Access: A Gewirthian Approach
WANG Xiaowei()
School of philosophy, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China
Download: PDF(278 KB)  
Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks
Abstract

The paper aims at exploring if we have sound philosophical reason to embrace a human right to Internet access. While attempts to make Internet access a candidate for the standing of human right have become popular in both the political and legal arenas, we still lack serious philosophical reflection on this issue. The paper first evaluates the arguments made by various authors, and then moves to provide its own conclusions. Its logic is that if (i) Internet access is crucial for enabling democracy, and (ii) democracy is a basic human right, then we may have at least prima facie reason to see such a technology as a derived human right whose normativity supervenes on the right to democracy.

Keywords human rights      internet access      democracy      moral philosophy     
Issue Date: 17 January 2017
 Cite this article:   
WANG Xiaowei. A Human Right to Internet Access: A Gewirthian Approach[J]. Front. Philos. China, 2016, 11(4): 652-670.
 URL:  
http://journal.hep.com.cn/fpc/EN/10.3868/s030-005-016-0044-3
http://journal.hep.com.cn/fpc/EN/Y2016/V11/I4/652
Service
E-mail this article
E-mail Alert
RSS
Articles by authors
WANG Xiaowei
Related articles from Frontiers Journals
[1] Yumi Suzuki. Moral Falsity in the Eyes of the Superhuman: The Cases of Socrates and Mozi[J]. Front. Philos. China, 2017, 12(4): 515-532.
[2] SHAN Jiangdong. On Affectionate Respect in Gender Justice: An Inquiry into the Cultural Abuse of Sex[J]. Front. Philos. China, 2017, 12(3): 483-504.
[3] YANG Tongjin. Is There an Identity Crisis in Environmental Ethics?[J]. Front. Philos. China, 2017, 12(2): 195-206.
[4] Ralph Weber. Confucian Political Philosophy for Non-Confucians[J]. Front. Philos. China, 2015, 10(4): 547-567.
[5] LUO Songtao. Adorno’s View of Life[J]. Front. Philos. China, 2015, 10(3): 444-456.
[6] Thomas M. Robinson. Plato the Democrat? Some Thoughts on the Politics of the Laws[J]. Front Phil Chin, 2013, 8(4): 530-545.
[7] Michael Slote. On Virtue Ethics[J]. Front Phil Chin, 2013, 8(1): 22-30.
[8] GAN Shaoping , . Human dignity as a right[J]. Front. Philos. China, 2009, 4(3): 370-384.
[9] HAN Shuifa. The concept of democracy[J]. Front Phil Chin, 2008, 3(4): 622-632.
[10] CHEN Lai. “After-sage” life pursuits: The ethical meaning of Feng Youlan’s Xin Shixun[J]. Front. Philos. China, 2007, 2(3): 363-378.
[11] Han Zhen. Democracy as a Way to Social Compromise[J]. Front. Philos. China, 2006, 1(1): 1-5.
[12] Yao Weiqun. Buddhist Thought and Several Problems in the World Today[J]. Front. Philos. China, 2006, 1(1): 144-147.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed