Please wait a minute...

Frontiers of Philosophy in China

Front. Philos. China    2016, Vol. 11 Issue (2) : 168-184     https://doi.org/10.3868/s030-005-016-0014-2
Orginal Article |
Research Findings Concerning Excavated Texts and Learning in Early China
GUO Yi()
Department of Philosophy, Seoul National University, Seoul 151-742, South Korea
Download: PDF(356 KB)  
Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks
Abstract

In the course of Chinese history, we find three instances of important and deliberate attempts to reconstruct ancient history. In the first two, the main path followed in the reconstruction process concerned setting in order and recovering the traditional writings. But recently, the main path is to confirm the genuineness of the traditional writings, correcting errors and filling in omissions in the traditional concepts according to the “method of double proof.” Based on this, I aim to advance a new understanding of some key controversial issues in the history of learning in early China, concerning Confucius and the Book of Changes, the Analects and the Analects-kind texts, the School of Zisi and its literary output, Lao Zi the man and the book, and the dates of Wen Zi, Guanyin Zi, and Lie Zi. On this basis, I conclude that the development of pre-Qin philosophy went through four periods, with two significant turning points therein.

Keywords reconstruction of ancient history      excavated texts      Chinese philosophy      early China     
Issue Date: 21 July 2016
 Cite this article:   
GUO Yi. Research Findings Concerning Excavated Texts and Learning in Early China[J]. Front. Philos. China, 2016, 11(2): 168-184.
 URL:  
http://journal.hep.com.cn/fpc/EN/10.3868/s030-005-016-0014-2
http://journal.hep.com.cn/fpc/EN/Y2016/V11/I2/168
Service
E-mail this article
E-mail Alert
RSS
Articles by authors
GUO Yi
Related articles from Frontiers Journals
[1] JIANG Yi. Chinese Philosophy in the New Era from the Perspective of the Theme of the 24th World Congress of Philosophy[J]. Front. Philos. China, 2018, 13(2): 182-193.
[2] PENG Guoxiang. Contemporary Chinese Philosophy in the Chinese-Speaking World: An Overview[J]. Front. Philos. China, 2018, 13(1): 91-119.
[3] Ady Van Den Stock. The Semantics of Wisdom in the Philosophy of Tang Junyi: Between Transformative Knowledge and Transcendental Reflexivity[J]. Front. Philos. China, 2018, 13(1): 39-54.
[4] Franklin Perkins. The Laozi and the Cosmogonic Turn in Classical Chinese Philosophy[J]. Front. Philos. China, 2016, 11(2): 185-205.
[5] Russell Pryba. Ars Erotica and Ars Gastronomica in Shusterman’s Somaesthetics[J]. Front. Philos. China, 2015, 10(2): 192-200.
[6] Ralph Weber. Why Talk about Chinese Metaphysics?[J]. Front Phil Chin, 2013, 8(1): 99-119.
[7] YU Zhiping, . The evolution and formation of indigenous narration in Chinese philosophy[J]. Front. Philos. China, 2009, 4(4): 511-523.
[8] XIANG Shiling. A study on the theory of “returning to the original” and “recovering nature” in Chinese philosophy[J]. Front Phil Chin, 2008, 3(4): 502-519.
[9] XU Jianping. A transition of Chinese humanism and aesthetics from rationalism to irrationalism —With a focus on the debate between Li Zhi and Geng Dingxiang during the Ming Dynasty[J]. Front. Philos. China, 2008, 3(2): 229-253.