Please wait a minute...

Frontiers of Philosophy in China

Front. Philos. China    2014, Vol. 9 Issue (3) : 396-416     https://doi.org/10.3868/s030-003-014-0034-8
research-article |
Beyond a Theory of Human Nature: Towards an Alternative Interpretation of Mencius’ Ethics
Hektor K. T. Yan()
Department of Public Policy, City University of Hong Kong, Kowloon, Hong Kong SAR, China
Download: PDF(342 KB)  
Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks
Abstract

By following the Wittgensteinian view that the sense of an ethical term such as “nature” (xing 性) should be understood through an examination of its function in its actual philosophical context, this article takes a look at the notion of xing in the Mencius from an alternative perspective. Proceeding from this perspective, it re-examines the view that xing in the Mencius should be understood in biological terms. A discussion of xing in relation to the “Why be moral?” question follows. I then offer an alternative interpretation of Mencius’ ethics by focusing on the meaning of the ethical particulars. Contrary to common perception, I argue that Mencius’ theory of human nature (renxing 人 性) need not occupy a central place in his moral philosophy; the ultimate foundation of Mencius’ moral philosophy lies in the meaning or sense of morality. Through participating in concrete, ethical thinking and by paying attention to the ethical particulars, human beings develop their grasp of moral and ethical meaning.

Keywords Mencius      human nature      xing      Wittgenstein      Prichard     
Issue Date: 23 September 2014
 Cite this article:   
Hektor K. T. Yan. Beyond a Theory of Human Nature: Towards an Alternative Interpretation of Mencius’ Ethics[J]. Front. Philos. China, 2014, 9(3): 396-416.
 URL:  
http://journal.hep.com.cn/fpc/EN/10.3868/s030-003-014-0034-8
http://journal.hep.com.cn/fpc/EN/Y2014/V9/I3/396
Service
E-mail this article
E-mail Alert
RSS
Articles by authors
Hektor K. T. Yan
Related articles from Frontiers Journals
[1] NI Peimin. Toward a Gongfu Reconstruction of Confucianism —Responses to Comments by Huang Yong, Fan Ruiping, and Wang Qingjie[J]. Front. Philos. China, 2018, 13(2): 240-253.
[2] John Makeham. Xiong Shili on the Nature, the Mind and the Origin of Badness as Evidenced in Ming Xin Pian 明心篇 (Explaining the Mind )[J]. Front. Philos. China, 2018, 13(1): 4-22.
[3] ZHENG Kai. Ontology and Metaphysics in Chinese Philosophy[J]. Front. Philos. China, 2017, 12(3): 408-428.
[4] WANG Miquan. The Meaning of Xing 形and Moral Transformation in Wuxing [J]. Front. Philos. China, 2016, 11(2): 222-235.
[5] Stewart Candlish. Was Wittgenstein an Analytic Philosopher? Wittgenstein vs Russell[J]. Front. Philos. China, 2016, 11(1): 35-53.
[6] CHEN Guying. The Tradition of Emotive Writing in the Zhuangzi and Its Echoes in Later Generations[J]. Front. Philos. China, 2015, 10(3): 340-352.
[7] GUO Yi. The Origin and Differentiation of the Theories of Human Nature in Pre-Qin China[J]. Front. Philos. China, 2015, 10(2): 212-238.
[8] Elisa Sabattini. The Physiology of Xin (Heart) in Chinese Political Argumentation: The Western Han Dynasty and the Pre-Imperial Legacy[J]. Front. Philos. China, 2015, 10(1): 58-74.
[9] Shirley Chan,Daniel Lee. Shendu and Qingdu: Reading the Recovered Bamboo and Silk Manuscripts[J]. Front. Philos. China, 2015, 10(1): 4-20.
[10] BAO Yongling. Water, Plant, Light, and Mirror: On the Root Metaphors of the Heart-Mind in Wang Yangming’s Thought[J]. Front. Philos. China, 2015, 10(1): 95-112.
[11] CHEN Lai. The Basic Character of the Virtue Theory of Mencius’ Philosophy and Its Significance in Classical Confucianism[J]. Front Phil Chin, 2013, 8(1): 4-21.
[12] DING Ji. The Manifestation Range of Innately Good Knowledge and Ability, and the Danger of Separation: On Zhuzi’s Question about Understanding Words[J]. Front Phil Chin, 2012, 7(2): 217-243.
[13] HU Jiaxiang. Mencius’ Aesthetics and Its Position[J]. Front Phil Chin, 2011, 6(1): 41-56.
[14] LI Youguang , . The True or the Artificial: Theories on Human Nature before Mencius and Xunzi—Based on “Sheng is from Ming, and Ming is from Tian”[J]. Front. Philos. China, 2010, 5(1): 31-50.
[15] LIANG Tao. Mencius and the tradition of articulating human nature in terms of growth[J]. Front Phil Chin, 2009, 4(2): 180-197.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed