Please wait a minute...

Frontiers of Philosophy in China

Front Phil Chin    2012, Vol. 7 Issue (3) : 481-497     https://doi.org/10.3868/s030-001-012-0029-8
research-article |
Kant’s Better Man and the Confucian Junzi
XIE Wenyu()
Center for Judaic and Inter-Religious Studies, School of Philosophy and Sociology, Shandong University, Jinan 250100, China
Download: PDF(314 KB)   HTML
Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks
Abstract

This essay attempts to compare Kant’s better man and the Confucian junzi in the Zhongyong, and argues that Kant’s idea of the better man, which expresses human self-improvement in ultimate freedom, is in fact a conception very similar to that of the Confucian junzi, which denotes an ideal human being in cheng. Kant attributes the lack of emphasis on self-improvement in Western culture to the Christian conception of grace, and demonstrates the possibility of self-improvement on the ground of ultimate freedom. We may call this treatment “the Confucian solution” in Kant’s thought. My intention is to explicate the conceptual commonality between the better man and the junzi and demonstrate the Confucian element in Kant’s religious thought.

Keywords better man      junzi      natural revelation      grace      Zhongyong      Kant     
Corresponding Authors: XIE Wenyu,Email:xiew@sdu.edu.cn   
Issue Date: 05 September 2012
 Cite this article:   
XIE Wenyu. Kant’s Better Man and the Confucian Junzi[J]. Front Phil Chin, 2012, 7(3): 481-497.
 URL:  
http://journal.hep.com.cn/fpc/EN/10.3868/s030-001-012-0029-8
http://journal.hep.com.cn/fpc/EN/Y2012/V7/I3/481
Service
E-mail this article
E-mail Alert
RSS
Articles by authors
XIE Wenyu
Related articles from Frontiers Journals
[1] Jana S. Rošker. From Humanized Nature to Naturalized Humans―Li Zehou’s Transformation of the Classical Chinese “Tianren Heyi ” Paradigm Through the Lens of Kant and Early Marx[J]. Front. Philos. China, 2018, 13(1): 72-90.
[2] James Swindal. Marx on Nature[J]. Front. Philos. China, 2014, 9(3): 358-369.
[3] Nicholas S. Brasovan. Conjunctions and/or Disjunctions: Radical Empiricism in the History of Philosophy[J]. Front. Philos. China, 2014, 9(1): 130-148.
[4] LIU Jing. Kant’s Virtue as Strength[J]. Front Phil Chin, 2013, 8(3): 451-470.
[5] CHEN Jiaming. On the Issues of Transcendental Argument[J]. Front Phil Chin, 2012, 7(2): 255-269.
[6] YAN Mengwei. Tolerance or Hospitality?[J]. Front Phil Chin, 2012, 7(1): 154-163.
[7] FANG Xudong. Confucian Ethics and Impartiality: On the Confucian View about Brotherhood[J]. Front Phil Chin, 2012, 7(1): 1-19.
[8] XIE Wenyu. The Concept of Junzi in the Zhongyong[J]. Front Phil Chin, 2011, 6(4): 501-520.
[9] GAO Guoxi, . Kant’s Virtue Theory[J]. Front. Philos. China, 2010, 5(2): 266-279.
[10] GUO Qiyong. Mou Zongsan’s view of interpreting Confucianism by “moral autonomy”[J]. Front. Philos. China, 2007, 2(3): 345-362.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed