Please wait a minute...

Frontiers of Philosophy in China

Front Phil Chin    2010, Vol. 5 Issue (4) : 506-522
research-article |
Reproduction, Familiarity, Love, and Humaneness: How Did Confucius Reveal “Humaneness”?
CHEN Hongxing()
Institute of Philosophy, Tianjin Academy of Social Sciences, Tianjin 300191, China
Download: PDF(664 KB)   HTML
Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks

This article draws out the subtle connections among the various sorts of categories—“sheng 生 (reproduction),” “qin 亲 (familiarity),” “ai 爱 (love),” and “ren 仁 (humaneness)”—focusing on the following: Confucius found the original significance of “reproduction” to be sympathy between males and females, and upon further study he found it extended to the .affinity of blood relations, namely “familiarity.” From “familiarity” he came to understand “love” that one generates and has for people and things beyond one’s blood relations, in other words, the empathic heart or the feeling of empathy itself. From here he anticipated rende 仁德 (the humane and virtuous) level of “fan’ai zhong 泛爱众 (universal love for all people)” or “fan’ai wanwu 泛爱万物 (universal love for all creatures).” The article further makes the point that in order to meet the conditions for the perfection of “humaneness” which has neither any excesses nor any deficiencies, Confucius ultimately developed a means, that is, “the golden mean,” which indicates that his ancient understanding of life and growth produced in Confucius a profound shift in the focus of human concern from “ming 命 (fate)” to “Dao 道 (the Way).”

Keywords humaneness      reproduction      familiarity      love      Way     
Corresponding Authors: CHEN Hongxing,   
Issue Date: 05 December 2010
 Cite this article:   
CHEN Hongxing. Reproduction, Familiarity, Love, and Humaneness: How Did Confucius Reveal “Humaneness”?[J]. Front Phil Chin, 2010, 5(4): 506-522.
E-mail this article
E-mail Alert
Articles by authors
CHEN Hongxing
Related articles from Frontiers Journals
[1] Ady Van Den Stock. The Semantics of Wisdom in the Philosophy of Tang Junyi: Between Transformative Knowledge and Transcendental Reflexivity[J]. Front. Philos. China, 2018, 13(1): 39-54.
[2] Patricia Huntington. Place as Refuge: Exploring the Poetical Legacy of Matsuo Bashō[J]. Front. Philos. China, 2017, 12(4): 572-590.
[3] WANG Tao. Was John Stuart Mill a Pluralist?[J]. Front. Philos. China, 2017, 12(2): 278-294.
[4] JIN Xiping. Heidegger’s Conception of Being-with (Mitsein ) and His Simple Designation of Social and Political Reality in the Black Notebooks[J]. Front. Philos. China, 2016, 11(3): 415-429.
[5] Cockburn David. Love and Identity: Unconditional Concern and Particularity[J]. Front Phil Chin, 2013, 8(4): 655-669.
[6] CHEN Yun. Bodily Subjectivity, Way of Administration and Governance in the Axial Age[J]. Front Phil Chin, 2013, 8(4): 624-640.
[7] XU Keqian. A Synthetic Comprehension of the Way of Zhong in Early Confucian Philosophy[J]. Front Phil Chin, 2012, 7(3): 422-438.
[8] GUO Qiyong, CUI Tao. The Values of Confucian Benevolence and the Universality of the Confucian Way of Extending Love[J]. Front Phil Chin, 2012, 7(1): 20-54.
[9] LI Ruohui. On Laozi’s Dao—An Attempt to Make Philosophy Speak Chinese[J]. Front Phil Chin, 2011, 6(1): 1-19.
[10] GAO Ruiquan. The Source of the Idea of Equality in Confucian Thought[J]. Front Phil Chin, 2010, 5(4): 486-505.
[11] LI Jinglin, . Mencius’ Refutation of Yang Zhu and Mozi and the Theoretical Implication of Confucian Benevolence and Love[J]. Front. Philos. China, 2010, 5(2): 155-178.
[12] CHEN Shaoming. Endurance and non-endurance: From the perspective of virtue ethics[J]. Front. Philos. China, 2008, 3(3): 335-351.
[13] Hao Changchi. Is Mozi a utilitarian philosopher?[J]. Front. Philos. China, 2006, 1(3): 382-400.
[14] Zhang Xianglong. Flowing Within the Text: A Discussion on He Lin’s Explanation of Zhu Xi’s Method of Intuition[J]. Front. Philos. China, 2006, 1(1): 60-65.
Full text