Please wait a minute...

Frontiers of Philosophy in China

Front Phil Chin    2010, Vol. 5 Issue (3) : 313-325     https://doi.org/10.1007/s11466-010-0101-7
research-article |
“A Happy Excursion” and Freedom
DENG Lianhe()
School of Philosophy and Social Development, Shandong University, Jinan 250100, China
Download: PDF(231 KB)   HTML
Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks
Abstract

In modern times, academics have used the perspective of political liberty and spiritual freedom to interpret and explain Zhuang Zi’s “happy excursion” as well as the substance of all his other thoughts. The starting point of the former is the political idea of laissez-faire; the latter involves the unique character of Zhuang Zi’s philosophy on life. But it misses the spiritual deficiency contained in Zhuang Zi, and so it is difficult to respond to criticism from modern liberals. This article argues that it is not quite accurate to use “happy excursion” to express modern freedom, but the spiritual tradition of “happy excursion” as a kind of native resource could still serve as a way to introduce the idea of liberalism at the level of a life philosophy based on independence, individual consciousness and the personal conscience and virtues embraced by the “happy excursion” thought of Zhuang Zi.

Keywords Zhuang Zi      happy excursion      freedom     
Corresponding Authors: DENG Lianhe,Email:denglianhe@163.com   
Issue Date: 05 September 2010
 Cite this article:   
DENG Lianhe. “A Happy Excursion” and Freedom[J]. Front Phil Chin, 2010, 5(3): 313-325.
 URL:  
http://journal.hep.com.cn/fpc/EN/10.1007/s11466-010-0101-7
http://journal.hep.com.cn/fpc/EN/Y2010/V5/I3/313
Service
E-mail this article
E-mail Alert
RSS
Articles by authors
DENG Lianhe
Related articles from Frontiers Journals
[1] Christopher C. Chrappa. The Incomprehensible Art of Thomas Hobbes[J]. Front. Philos. China, 2016, 11(4): 680-697.
[2] XU Keqian. The Priority of “Liberty” or “Ping An ”: Two Different Cultural Value Priorities and Their Impacts[J]. Front. Philos. China, 2015, 10(4): 579-600.
[3] Michael Slote. From Virtue to Freedom through Emotion[J]. Front. Philos. China, 2015, 10(3): 430-443.
[4] CHU Zhaohua. On the Constitution and the True Aim of “The Joy of Heaven” and “Non-Speech”: A Reinterpretation of the Debate at the Dam over the Hao River[J]. Front. Philos. China, 2014, 9(4): 555-569.
[5] LIU Jing. Kant’s Virtue as Strength[J]. Front Phil Chin, 2013, 8(3): 451-470.
[6] ZHANG Xianglong. Kant’s View on the Parent-Child Relationship and Its Problems—Analyses from a Temporal Perspective as to the Creation and Rearing of a Being Endowed with Freedom[J]. Front Phil Chin, 2011, 6(1): 145-160.
[7] LI Jinglin. Philosophical edifi cation and edificatory philosophy: On the basic features of the Confucian spirit[J]. Front. Philos. China, 2007, 2(2): 151-171.
[8] Yu Wujin. Thing, Value, Time, and Freedom: A Consideration of Some Key Concepts in Marx’s Philosophical System[J]. Front. Philos. China, 2006, 1(1): 114-123.
[9] Zhang Xianglong. Flowing Within the Text: A Discussion on He Lin’s Explanation of Zhu Xi’s Method of Intuition[J]. Front. Philos. China, 2006, 1(1): 60-65.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed