Please wait a minute...

Frontiers of Philosophy in China

Front Phil Chin    2009, Vol. 4 Issue (2) : 264-281     https://doi.org/10.1007/s11466-009-0017-2
research-article |
The enlightenment: Conscience and authority in judgment
XIE Wenyu()
Center for Judaic and Inter-religious Studies, University of Shandong, Jinan 250100, China
Download: PDF(253 KB)   HTML
Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks
Abstract

There were two prevailing sentiments in Europe after the Reformation: One opposing papal authority and one advocating individual freedom. This paper analyzes these two sentiments and finds that the concept of conscience is crucial in understanding them. The issue of conscience is about judging truth and good, and in initiating the Reformation, Martin Luther heavily appealed to his conscience while countering Catholic attacks. With the wide dispersal of the Reformation, Luther’s notion of conscience was well received among his supporters throughout Europe. Descartes later transformed Luther’s conscience into an epistemological being (the cogito), and argued that its existence was the only valid thing that survived his thorough skepticism — and as such is the foundation of human knowledge. Rousseau continued this line of thinking, which we call subjectivism, and re-employed the term conscience as a replacement for cogito, holding that conscience is the final authority in judging good and bad; that, as the starting point of human existence, it cannot be withheld from any human being; and that it therefore constitutes an inalienable human right. This paper argues that the Enlightenment was a subjectivist movement propelled by this conscience-cogito-conscience conceptualization, and that it sought to enlighten this inalienable conscience.

Keywords conscience      enlightenment      Luther      Descartes      Rousseau     
Corresponding Authors: XIE Wenyu,Email:xiew@sdu.edu.cn   
Issue Date: 05 June 2009
 Cite this article:   
XIE Wenyu. The enlightenment: Conscience and authority in judgment[J]. Front Phil Chin, 2009, 4(2): 264-281.
 URL:  
http://journal.hep.com.cn/fpc/EN/10.1007/s11466-009-0017-2
http://journal.hep.com.cn/fpc/EN/Y2009/V4/I2/264
Service
E-mail this article
E-mail Alert
RSS
Articles by authors
XIE Wenyu
Related articles from Frontiers Journals
[1] QIAO Qingju. Feng Youlan’s Research into the History of Philosophy and Philosophical Creation[J]. Front. Philos. China, 2018, 13(1): 23-38.
[2] ZHANG Weite. Descartes’ Metaphysical Doubts about Clear and Distinct Perception[J]. Front. Philos. China, 2017, 12(1): 151-181.
[3] WEN Haiming,, CHEN Deming. “Confucian Cultural Fallacy” in the 20th Century Chinese Enlightenment Movement[J]. Front Phil Chin, 2013, 8(2): 199-214.
[4] Jonathan Israel. The Battle over Confucius and Classical Chinese Philosophy in European Early Enlightenment Thought (1670-1730)[J]. Front Phil Chin, 2013, 8(2): 183-198.
[5] QIANG Yu. The Philosophies of Laozi and Zhuangzi and the Bamboo-slip Essay Hengxian[J]. Front Phil Chin, 2009, 4(1): 88-115.
[6] MO Weimin. Cogito: From Descartes to Sartre*[J]. Front. Philos. China, 2007, 2(2): 247-264.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed