Effects of critical geometric parameters on the optical performance of a conical cavity receiver

Abstract

The optical performance of a receiver has a great influence on the efficiency and stability of a solar thermal power system. Most of the literature focuses on the optical performance of receivers with different geometric shapes, but less research is conducted on the effects of critical geometric parameters. In this paper, the commercial software TracePro was used to investigate the effects of some factors on a conical cavity receiver, such as the conical angle, the number of loops of the helical tube, and the distance between the focal point of the collector and the aperture. These factors affect the optical efficiency, the maximum heat flux density, and the light distribution in the conical cavity. The optical performance of the conical receiver was studied and analyzed using the Monte Carlo ray tracing method. To make a reliable simulation, the helical tube was attached to the inner wall of the cavity in the proposed model. The results showed that the amount of light rays reaching the helical tube increases with the increasing of the conical angle, while the optical efficiency decreases and the maximum heat flux density increases. The increase in the number of loops contributed to an increase in the optical efficiency and a uniform light distribution. The conical cavity receiver had an optimal optical performance when the focal point of the collector was near the aperture.

Keywords

parabolic collector / conical cavity receiver / critical geometric parameters / optical performance

References

[1] Tsoutsos T, Gekas V, Marketaki K. Technical and economical evaluation of solar thermal power generation. Renewable Energy, 2003, 28(6): 873–886

[2] Huang W, Huang F, Hu P, Chen Z. Prediction and optimization of the performance of parabolic solar dish concentrator with sphere receiver using analytical function. Renewable Energy, 2013, 53(9): 18–26

[3] Flesch R, Stadler H, Uhlig R, Pitz-Paal R. Numerical analysis of the influence of inclination angle and wind on the heat losses of cavity receivers for solar thermal power towers. Solar Energy, 2014, 110(110): 427–437

[4] Xiao L, Wu S Y, Li Y R. Numerical study on combined free-forced convection heat loss of solar cavity receiver under wind environments. International Journal of Thermal Sciences, 2012, 60(1): 182–194

[5] Wu S Y, Guo F H, Xiao L. Numerical investigation on combined natural convection and radiation heat losses in one side open cylindrical cavity with constant heat flux. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 2014, 71(3): 573–584

[6] Wu S Y, Xiao L, Li Y R. Effect of aperture position and size on natural convection heat loss of a solar heat-pipe receiver. Applied Thermal Engineering, 2011, 31(14–15): 2787–2796

[7] Cui F, He Y, Cheng Z, Li Y. Study on combined heat loss of a dish receiver with quartz glass cover. Applied Energy, 2013, 112(4): 690–696

[8] Reddy K S, Vikram T S, Veershetty G. Combined heat loss analysis of solar parabolic dish- modified cavity receiver for superheated steam generation. Solar Energy, 2015, 121: 78–93

[9] Vikram T S, Reddy K S. Estimation of heat losses from modified cavity mono-tube boiler receiver of solar parabolic dish for steam generation. Energy Procedia, 2014, 57: 371–380

[10] Collado F J. One-point fitting of the flux density produced by a heliostat. Solar Energy, 2010, 84(4): 673–684

[11] Li H, Huang W, Huang F, Hu P, Chen Z. Optical analysis and optimization of parabolic dish solar concentrator with a cavity receiver. Solar Energy, 2013, 92(4): 288–297

[12] Xie W T, Dai Y J, Wang R Z. Numerical and experimental analysis of a point focus solar collector using high concentration imaging PMMA Fresnel lens. Energy Conversion and Management, 2011, 52(6): 2417–2426

[13] Li X, Dai Y J, Wang R Z. Performance investigation on solar thermal conversion of a conical cavity receiver employing a beam-down solar tower concentrator. Solar Energy, 2015, 114: 134–151

[14] Daabo A M, Mahmoud S, Al-Dadah R K. The optical efficiency of three different geometries of a small scale cavity receiver for concentrated solar applications. Applied Energy, 2016, 179: 1081–1096

[15] Daabo A M, Ahmad A, Mahmoud S, Al-Dadah R K. Parametric analysis of small scale cavity receiver with optimum shape for solar powered closed Brayton cycle applications. Applied Thermal Engineering, 2017, 122: 626–641

[16] Li S, Xu G, Luo X, Quan Y, Ge Y. Optical performance of a solar dish concentrator/receiver system: influence of geometrical and surface properties of cavity receiver. Energy, 2016, 113: 95–107

[17] Wang F, Lin R, Liu B, Tan H, Shuai Y. Optical efficiency analysis of cylindrical cavity receiver with bottom surface convex. Solar Energy, 2013, 90(4): 195–204

[18] Shuai Y, Xia X L, Tan H P. Radiation performance of dish solar concentrator/cavity receiver systems. Solar Energy, 2008, 82(1): 13–21

[19] Przenzak E, Szubel M, Filipowicz M. The numerical model of the high temperature receiver for concentrated solar radiation. Energy Conversion and Management, 2016, 125: 97–106

[20] Andraka C E, Yellowhair J, Iverson B D. A parametric study of the impact of various error contributions on the flux distribution of a solar dish concentrator. In: ASME 2010 4th International Conference on Energy Sustainability, Phoenix, AZ, USA, 2010, 2: 565–580

[21] Zou C, Zhang Y, Feng H, Falcoz Q, Neveu P, Gao W, Zhang C. Effects of geometric parameters on thermal performance for a cylindrical solar receiver using a 3D numerical model. Energy Conversion and Management, 2017, 149: 293–302

[22] Zou C, Zhang Y, Falcoz Q, Neveu P, Zhang C, Shu W, Huang S. Design and optimization of a high-temperature cavity receiver for a solar energy cascade utilization system. Renewable Energy, 2017, 103: 478–489

[23] Prakash M, Kedare S B, Nayak J K. Investigations on heat losses from a solar cavity receiver. Solar Energy, 2009, 83(2): 157–170

[24] Prakash M, Kedare S B, Nayak J K. Determination of stagnation and convective zones in a solar cavity receiver. International Journal of Thermal Sciences, 2010, 49(4): 680–691

[25] Wang J, Yang S, Jiang C, Yan Q, Lund P D. A novel 2-stage dish concentrator with improved optical performance for concentrating solar power plants. Renewable Energy, 2017, 108: 92–97

[26] Zhu Y, Shi J, Li Y, Wang L, Huang Q, Xu G. Design and thermal performances of a scalable linear Fresnel reflector solar system. Energy Conversion and Management, 2017, 146: 174–181

[27] Sarwar J, Georgakis G, Kouloulias K, Kakosimos K E. Experimental and numerical investigation of the aperture size effect on the efficient solar energy harvesting for solar thermochemical applications. Energy Conversion and Management, 2015, 92: 331–341

[28] Chang H, Duan C, Wen K, Liu Y, Xiang C, Wan Z, He S, Jing C, Shu S. Modeling study on the thermal performance of a modified cavity receiver with glass window and secondary reflector. Energy Conversion and Management, 2015, 106: 1362–1369

[29] Jafrancesco D, Sansoni P, Francini F, Fontani D. Strategy and criteria to optically design a solar concentration plant. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2016, 60: 1066–1073

[30] Hasuike H, Yoshizawa Y, Suzuki A, Tamaura Y. Study on design of molten salt solar receivers for beam-down solar concentrator. Solar Energy, 2006, 80(10): 1255–1262

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by the National Program of International Science and Technology Cooperation of China (Project No. 2014DFA60990).

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2019 Higher Education Press and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature