Improved approach to quality function deployment based on Pythagorean fuzzy sets and application to assembly robot design evaluation

Abstract

Quality function deployment (QFD) is an effective method that helps companies analyze customer requirements (CRs). These CRs are then turned into product or service characteristics, which are translated to other attributes. With the QFD method, companies could design or improve the quality of products or services close to CRs. To increase the effectiveness of QFD, we propose an improved method based on Pythagorean fuzzy sets (PFSs). We apply an extended method to obtain the group consensus evaluation matrix. We then use a combined weight determining method to integrate former weights to objective weights derived from the evaluation matrix. To determine the exact score of each PFS in the evaluation matrix, we develop an improved score function. Lastly, we apply the proposed method to a case study on assembly robot design evaluation.

Keywords

quality function deployment / Pythagorean fuzzy sets / group consensus / combined weights / assembly robot design

References

[1] Cardoso J F, Casarotto Filho N, Cauchick Miguel P A (2015). Application of Quality Function Deployment for the development of an organic product. Food Quality and Preference, 40: 180–190

[2] Chan L K, Kao H P, Wu M L (1999). Rating the importance of customer needs in quality function deployment by fuzzy and entropy methods. International Journal of Production Research, 37(11): 2499–2518

[3] Chen Y Z, Ngai E W T (2008). A fuzzy QFD program modeling approach using the method of imprecision. International Journal of Production Research, 46(24): 6823–6840

[4] Dinçer H, Yüksel S, Martínez L (2019). Balanced scorecard-based analysis about European energy investment policies: a hybrid hesitant fuzzy decision-making approach with Quality Function Deployment. Expert Systems with Applications, 115: 152–171

[5] Karsak E E, Sozer S, Alptekin S E (2003). Product planning in Quality Function Deployment using a combined analytic network process and goal programming approach. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 44(1): 171–190

[6] Khoo L P, Ho N C (1996). Framework of a fuzzy quality function deployment system. International Journal of Production Research, 34(2): 299–311

[7] Pasawang T, Chatchanayuenyong T, Sa-Ngiamvibool W (2015). QFD-based conceptual design of an autonomous underwater robot. Songklanakarin Journal of Science and Technology, 37(6): 659–668

[8] Peng X D, Yang Y (2015). Some results for pythagorean fuzzy sets. International Journal of Intelligent Systems, 30(11): 1133–1160

[9] Moğol Sever M. (2018). Improving check-in (C/I) process: an application of the quality function deployment. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 35(9): 1907–1919

[10] Sharma N, Singhi R (2018). Logistics and supply chain management quality improvement of supply chain process through vendor managed inventory: a QFD approach. Journal of Supply Chain Management System, 7(3): 23–33

[11] Tunca M Z, Bayhan M (2012). Using quality function deployment method in the supplier selection. Pamukkale Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 11: 53–69

[12] Wang N N (2015). The research of medical service quality improvement based on quality function deployment. Dissertation for the Masters Degree. Zhengzhou: Zhengzhou University (in Chinese)

[13] Wu X L, Liao H C (2018). An approach to quality function deployment based on probabilistic linguistic term sets and ORESTE method for multi-expert multi-criteria decision making. Information Fusion, 43: 13–26

[14] Wu X L, Liao H C, Xu Z S, Hafezalkotob A, Herrera F (2018). Probabilistic linguistic MULTIMOORA: a multi-criteria decision making method based on the probabilistic linguistic expectation function and the improved borda rule. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, 26(6): 3688–3702

[15] Wu Y H, Ho C C (2015). Integration of green quality function deployment and fuzzy theory: a case study on green mobile phone design. Journal of Cleaner Production, 108: 271–280

[16] Yager R R (2013). Pythagorean fuzzy subsets. In: Proc. Joint IFSA World Congress and NAFIPS Annual Meeting, Edmonton, Canada, 57–61

[17] Yager R R (2014). Pythagorean membership grades in multi-criteria decision making. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, 22(4): 958–965

[18] Yager R R, Abbasov A M (2013). Pythagorean membership grades, complex numbers, and decision making. International Journal of Intelligent Systems, 28(5): 436–452

[19] Yazdani M, Chatterjee P, Zavadskas E K, Hashemkhani Zolfani S (2017). Integrated QFD-MCDM framework for green supplier selection. Journal of Cleaner Production, 142: 3728–3740

[20] Yazdani M, Kahraman C, Zarate P, Onar S C (2019). A fuzzy multi attribute decision framework with integration of QFD and grey relational analysis. Expert Systems with Applications, 115: 474–485

[21] Zhang L Y, Li T, Xu X H (2014). Consensus model for multiple criteria group decision making under intuitionistic fuzzy environment. Knowledge-Based Systems, 57: 127–135

[22] Zhang X L, Xu Z S (2014). Extension of TOPSIS to multiple criteria decision making with Pythagorean fuzzy sets. International Journal of Intelligent Systems, 29(12): 1061–1078

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2020 Higher Education Press