Early and mid-term results in patients undergoing primary CABG in comparison with patients with PCI prior to CABG
Paolo Nardi , Laura Asta , Daniele Trombetti , Carlo Bassano , Fabio Bertoldo , Calogera Pisano , Dario Buioni , Maria Sabrina Ferrante , Alessandro Cristian Salvati , Mattia Scognamiglio , Claudia Altieri , Giovanni Ruvolo
Vessel Plus ›› 2022, Vol. 6 ›› Issue (1) : 61
Aim: We evaluated the impact of prior percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) on early and mid-term results in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG).
Methods: Between 2015 and 2020, 938 consecutive patients (mean age 67.4 ± 9.11 years) underwent CABG with prior PCI (n = 121) or primary CABG (n = 817). The mean follow-up was 37 ± 25 (median 36) months. Kaplan-Meier estimates were used to assess survival rates, while Logistic and Cox model analysis regressions assessed the risk of prior PCI and other variables.
Results: Six-year survival including in-hospital mortality was 79% ± 6% in CABG with prior-PCI patients vs.
Conclusion: Patients undergoing CABG after prior PCI have worse perioperative outcomes. Mid-term reduced survival in the prior-PCI patients is mainly due to the concomitant presence of worse clinical presentation and increased comorbidity. Freedom from cardiac death is comparable and satisfactory in both cohorts, highlighting the positive protective effect of CABG over time.
Coronary artery bypass graft / percutaneous coronary intervention / coronary surgery
| [1] |
|
| [2] |
|
| [3] |
|
| [4] |
|
| [5] |
|
| [6] |
|
| [7] |
|
| [8] |
|
| [9] |
|
| [10] |
|
| [11] |
|
| [12] |
|
| [13] |
|
| [14] |
|
| [15] |
|
| [16] |
|
| [17] |
|
| [18] |
|
| [19] |
|
| [20] |
|
| [21] |
|
| [22] |
|
| [23] |
|
| [24] |
|
| [25] |
|
| [26] |
|
| [27] |
|
| [28] |
|
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |